When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
There could very possibly be something wrong with my car, but today was the first time I ever tried to run it the least bit hard since I bought it 4 weeks ago and I was very disappointed. I had a C4 with highway gears and I could sit at a stop light and turn off the traction control. When that light changed I would stomp it and get a decent spin out of the tires until it hooked up and pulled hard. The C5 I have now has NO launch. I turned off traction control and hit it and it just moved forward, no spin. I put it in competitive driving mode...no spin. It is as if I am starting off with my foot on the brake. Now don't get me wrong, it DOES perform. A stomp at 60 will have me over 100 in a blink of an eye, but from a dead stop, my C4 would blow this cars doors off. This is a 2004 CE vert with 14k on the clock. Any idea why it is such a dog? Am I doing something wrong? Is there some aspect of this car I don't understand that would cause this to happen? I am not 100% certain, but I am 99% certain BOTH have 2:73 gears.
Both were automatics and I have lost the build sheet for the C4 years ago, but I DO know that it had the worst rear end available. That much I remember and the C5 does too.
From: In a parallel universe. Currently own 2014 Stingray Coupe.
C7 of the Year - Modified Finalist 2021
MO Events Coordinator
St. Jude Co-Organizer
St. Jude Donor '03 thru '26
NCM Sinkhole Donor
CI 5, 8 & 11 Veteran
If you have 2.73 gears in your C5, that is part of the problem. Other than that, I'd say there would have to be something else wrong with the car if your C5 can't outperform an LT1. I had two LT1s and two LS1s and the C5s were much better performers hands down.
Depending on the C4, it probably was tuned for torque (L98, for instance), and ran out of steam about the time the C5 started to really turn on. The C4s had a lot of "seat of the pants" feeling up to about 60, but at higher speeds couldn't breathe enough to produce a whole lot of power. Hope this makes sense!
Depending on the C4, it probably was tuned for torque (L98, for instance), and ran out of steam about the time the C5 started to really turn on. The C4s had a lot of "seat of the pants" feeling up to about 60, but at higher speeds couldn't breathe enough to produce a whole lot of power. Hope this makes sense!
Yes, it makes sense, still pretty disappointing. My friends 89 launching beside me hung with me up until we hit about 50 or so, and that did not make me happy at all. I was always hating that my 95 got spanked by SS Camaros and hoped that I could get revenge with this car, but I guess not. I don't go for top speed like I did when I was young. I like the quick shot up to the speed limit when I am merging. This is crushing when i think of how much I could have saved by getting another C4 instead of this car.
They were both automatics so it does not apply. I bought autos because I live in Houston and traffic typically sucks and an hour spent pushing in the clutch has no appeal to me. I had a stick for about a year and it was torture.
Look at your diferential, and it will say the ratio your tranny has. It's either 2:73 gears or the optional 3:15 rear end. If I get on the vette hard enough, it will burn the tires and then when it grabs the road it takes off like a rapped ape. Although the car does "launch" and it wont spin the tires much, which is true, unless you really mean to spin them.
Look at your diferential, and it will say the ratio your tranny has. It's either 2:73 gears or the optional 3:15 rear end. If I get on the vette hard enough, it will burn the tires and then when it grabs the road it takes off like a rapped ape. Although the car does "launch" and it wont spin the tires much, which is true, unless you really mean to spin them.
I know the C5 is 2.73s. I don't recall what the C4 had but I DO know it was the worst ratio from my build sheet. So as far as rear gears, they were essentially equal. Yes, I realize I can modify, but that is a secondary issue. My concern is that I can't spin the tires, not whether I should or shouldn't. I think at 350HP versus 300HP and nearly the same rear end, both should perform similarly. The C5 will not break the tires loose. Is weight bias the same? Heck, my 2000 Silverado will spin and it has a 4.8.
Ok I looked it up. The C4 had the 2.59 rear end.
Last edited by Aerovette; Aug 27, 2009 at 12:18 AM.
2.73s are terrible. Get a set of 3.42 and a Yank 3200, and you will be truly surprised at the gain in performance. Now if I turn the tc off and hit it, it will spin for a hell of a long time.
Yup, 2:73's aren't the best gears. I have a friend who has a cousin who has a nephew that has a millenium yellow C5, and that car has 2:73 gears. They also have a ford lightning and they have had them both the C5 with the 2:73's and the Ligthning at the track and the ligthning won. They are both bone stock.
Let that go you no longer have a c4. What gears did you have in the c4? Plus with the dyno tune if there is something wrong and you're low on RWHP the numbers will show it and you can take it from there.
Both were automatics and I have lost the build sheet for the C4 years ago, but I DO know that it had the worst rear end available. That much I remember and the C5 does too.
1st of all, what "gear" are you starting in?
I believe that if you start in Drive you are in 2nd gear.
People seem to be missing your point over and over.
There is something wrong with your car if it truly is slower than your C4. Period.
C5 with 2.73s is in the mid 13s on average. A few "freak" cars in the low 13s but that generally is not the norm without the performance axle. I think auto LT1 C4s without performance gears are in the high 13-low 14 category, right?
I can see the LT1 feeling faster if you're just punching it off the line without brake torquing. By the time you get up to highway speeds the C5 should feel a hell of a lot faster.