When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I sold my Vette a few weeks back, dumb move, and now I'm looking to replace it. I have been looking high and low and have found a couple of cars I'm considering. One is a 97 with very low miles, about 26k while the other one is an '03 with 50k miles. Prices are similar and both are well optioned. Should the miles scare my off the '03? I would prefer to buy it over the 97 but the miles are nearly 2X as much. Any thoughts? Thanks.
From: Reno is so close to Hell you can see Sparks , State Of Confusion
St. Jude Donor '12-'13-'14
In my opinion if the pricing are about the same I would go the 03 for a number of reasons, The 03 will have a higher resale value, It will have the lastest upgrades, I wouldn't worry about 50K miles at all.
You are talking about a car that is 6 years newer.
Just my 2 cents.
Mr.Bill
I would also go with the 03..... they made some small upgrades to them. plus you will get HUD That is if they are priced right and they are the color you want.
In my opinion if the pricing are about the same I would go the 03 for a number of reasons, The 03 will have a higher resale value, It will have the lastest upgrades, I wouldn't worry about 50K miles at all.
You are talking about a car that is 6 years newer.
Just my 2 cents.
Mr.Bill
In my opinion if the pricing are about the same I would go the 03 for a number of reasons, The 03 will have a higher resale value, It will have the lastest upgrades, I wouldn't worry about 50K miles at all.
You are talking about a car that is 6 years newer.
Just my 2 cents.
Mr.Bill
With one exception, and that is the condition of the '97 versus the '03. How well were there each maintained? 50k miles on one of these is not a lot of miles. 50k is about half of what would be considered normal mileage for a 7 year old car. As I stated, as long as the owners has done or had done all the required maintenance on them I would go with the '03.
In my opinion if the pricing are about the same I would go the 03 for a number of reasons, The 03 will have a higher resale value, It will have the lastest upgrades, I wouldn't worry about 50K miles at all.
You are talking about a car that is 6 years newer.
Just my 2 cents.
Mr.Bill
Definitely go with the 03 over a 97. No offense to other owners, but I personally would not buy a 97 period. The only pre 01 C5 I would consider is a 98 pace car. No need to get an older one when you can get a newer, upgraded one.
My biggest problem is that neither car is anywhere near me so I have to rely on prepurchase inspections. The '03 is in Oklahoma City and that's over 1300 miles away. The 97 is in Michigan which is 500 miles away. I'm really leaning towards the '03 but I'm not sure how to close the deal with regard to title and state DMV rules. Boy, if anyone here is near OK City I sure would appreciate a look see at the car before buying I never thought it would be this hard to replace my car. I've looked at 100's of online ads and boy are summer prices higher than winter prices. I thought someone was saying C5 values are in the crapper Not the ones I'm looking at
From: In a parallel universe. Currently own 2014 Stingray Coupe.
C7 of the Year - Modified Finalist 2021
MO Events Coordinator
St. Jude Co-Organizer
St. Jude Donor '03 thru '25
NCM Sinkhole Donor
CI 5, 8 & 11 Veteran
Prices and condition of the cars being equal, I'd choose the '03.
Here's a thought - see if there is a forum member in the area of each car that would be willing to go take a look at it for you. Post up in the regional sections - I'd bet someone will volunteer to help you out. Based on that feedback, you can then decide whether or not to have an inspection company look at either car or just go out there and check them out yourself.