Notices
C5 General General C5 Corvette and C5 Z06 Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

ZO6 hp claims underrated?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-28-2011, 09:37 AM
  #1  
Write2Drive
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
Write2Drive's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2011
Location: Cincinnati OH
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default ZO6 hp claims underrated?

As with many performance GM engines over the years, I've heard rumors that my '03 Z might have closer to 430 hp as opposed to 405 hp? Any truth to this rumor?

Cheers.
Old 03-28-2011, 10:00 AM
  #2  
Oldvetter
Le Mans Master
 
Oldvetter's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2002
Location: Waldorf MD
Posts: 6,937
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Not likely, I believe that 2002 ZO6s run about 350-360 HP at rear wheels on dynos.

Last edited by Oldvetter; 03-28-2011 at 10:02 AM.
Old 03-28-2011, 10:02 AM
  #3  
RetiredSFC 97
Team Owner
 
RetiredSFC 97's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: Somewhere in Mo
Posts: 73,434
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts
St. Jude Donor '09-'10, '14

Default

Don't know, but they did under estimate the LT4 engine, so I guess it's possible.
Old 03-28-2011, 10:02 AM
  #4  
All_Motor_C5LS6
Drifting
 
All_Motor_C5LS6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2010
Location: Katy TX
Posts: 1,447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nope. 405bhp w/12% drivetrain loss is about 357-360rwhp.
Old 03-28-2011, 10:04 AM
  #5  
djamigolxr50
Burning Brakes
 
djamigolxr50's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2011
Location: Saint Petersburg FL
Posts: 828
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The crank horsepower numbers have been underrated, but not by much.
Normally 02-04 Z06 Corvettes dyno in the 347-360 rwhp range (stock).
For example: My stock 03' Z06 dynoed at 356 rwhp stock.

There are always exceptions though.
Old 03-28-2011, 10:10 AM
  #6  
RetiredSFC 97
Team Owner
 
RetiredSFC 97's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: Somewhere in Mo
Posts: 73,434
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts
St. Jude Donor '09-'10, '14

Default

Originally Posted by All_Motor_C5LS6
Nope. 405bhp w/12% drivetrain loss is about 357-360rwhp.
that must be fairly accurate, my FRC dyno'd at 307. which is right at 12% loss.
Old 03-28-2011, 10:15 AM
  #7  
Oldvetter
Le Mans Master
 
Oldvetter's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2002
Location: Waldorf MD
Posts: 6,937
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Years ago, they sometimes overrated engine horsepower (actually it was due to the method of rating horsepower, called gross horsepower). For example the 1967 427 cu-in 435 horsepower was rated without accessories (alternator, power steering pump, water pump, etc.) and exhaust.

Our 345-350 HP Coupes and Convertibles would rate about 415 HP using this system. Which would explain why in conjunction with better tires our C5s have slightly better performance than these monsters.

However, they did underrate some engines, the 1969 427 cu-in 430 HP L88 "racing engine" was actually about 500-520 hp (using 103 octane gas).

Last edited by Oldvetter; 03-28-2011 at 11:47 AM.
Old 03-28-2011, 12:19 PM
  #8  
Vetteman Jack
Administrator

Support Corvetteforum!
 
Vetteman Jack's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: In a parallel universe. Currently own 2014 Stingray Coupe.
Posts: 343,292
Received 19,388 Likes on 14,024 Posts
C7 of the Year - Modified Finalist 2021
MO Events Coordinator
St. Jude Co-Organizer
St. Jude Donor '03-'04-'05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-
'20-'21-'22-'23-'24
NCM Sinkhole Donor
CI 5, 8 & 11 Veteran


Default

Every car can be a little different on the actual hp numbers that are achieved out of the car, but I doubt there would be that much of a difference. Only way to tell is get the car dyno'd and then work back to the crank HP.
Old 03-28-2011, 12:28 PM
  #9  
flynbyu2
Melting Slicks
 
flynbyu2's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2008
Location: Orangevale California
Posts: 3,310
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
St. Jude Donor '10

Default

Remember the DZ302...

Chevrolet produced a special 302 cu in (4.9 L) (referred to as 5.0 L) engine for Trans Am racing from 1967–1969. It was the product of placing the 3-inch stroke crankshaft into a 4-inch bore block. The 302 used the same crank as the 283.[5] When the journal size increased to the standard medium journal size, the crankshaft for the 302 was specially built of forged steel.[5] This engine was used only in the first-generation Camaro Z28. Conservatively rated at 290 hp (216 kW), actual output was around 472 hp (352 kW). This block is one of 3 displacements that underwent a transformation for the 1968/1969 period when the main bearing size was increased from 2.30 in to 2.45 in.
Old 03-28-2011, 12:44 PM
  #10  
Chalky
Safety Car

 
Chalky's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 1999
Location: S.E. WI.
Posts: 4,243
Received 69 Likes on 50 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10

Default

472 HP in Traco prepared race trim maybe. Sorry but the 302 as purchased was no wheres near the 472 HP from the factory.
Old 03-28-2011, 01:15 PM
  #11  
ShawnFate
Racer
 
ShawnFate's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2011
Location: Arkansas - river valley
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by flynbyu2
Remember the DZ302...

Chevrolet produced a special 302 cu in (4.9 L) (referred to as 5.0 L) engine for Trans Am racing from 1967–1969. It was the product of placing the 3-inch stroke crankshaft into a 4-inch bore block. The 302 used the same crank as the 283.[5] When the journal size increased to the standard medium journal size, the crankshaft for the 302 was specially built of forged steel.[5] This engine was used only in the first-generation Camaro Z28. Conservatively rated at 290 hp (216 kW), actual output was around 472 hp (352 kW). This block is one of 3 displacements that underwent a transformation for the 1968/1969 period when the main bearing size was increased from 2.30 in to 2.45 in.
I have a chevy 302 sitting in a firebird, I blew the head gaskets and its been sitting.
Its a fun high revving engine.
Old 03-28-2011, 01:17 PM
  #12  
ALVETTE00
Drifting
 
ALVETTE00's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,435
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I think the only BS that GM slung with the LS engine was with respect to the F-Bodys. They chassis dyno the same as a C5, yet were rated less.
Old 03-28-2011, 02:30 PM
  #13  
Toque
Tech Contributor
 
Toque's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Wylie TX --> Less is More, except under the hood !
Posts: 20,003
Received 179 Likes on 99 Posts

Default

358rwhp when my Z06 was stock.
I think GM was on target with the 405 rating.

I have seen in person a 370rwhp dyno on a stock 2002 Z06 though. I think its rare, but it happens to see one above the average.

Toque
Old 03-28-2011, 02:35 PM
  #14  
Z06X
Burning Brakes
 
Z06X's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2010
Location: Pittsburgh Pa
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Depends on the parameters set within the dyno. All dyno's don't read the same, so that's more responsible for the variation than anything.

Get notified of new replies

To ZO6 hp claims underrated?




Quick Reply: ZO6 hp claims underrated?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:44 PM.