When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Sorry if this has been asked before or sounds stupid. I read some of the threads on Vert vrs Coupe ect but haven't seen one on this.
I have been watching for a project car to come up at auction. I thought I had my mind made up to wait for a 99 Vert I spotted with a
6spd. But recently I spotted an Electron Blue Z06 that is upcoming.
So my question is, how much different are they to drive. Not concerned about Vert vrs FRC but drivetrain and suspension differences. Comfort, fuel mileage, maintenance issues...those sorts of things. In other words is the Z06 any harder to live with as a cruiser or trip car? I'm sort of old school and have hot rodded lots of vehicles. Things always seem to be a compomise and something has to be sacrificed for the added performace.
Just looking for thoughts from those who have owned or driven both.
I drive a 2001 coupe 6 speed and it is fine as a daily driver (although mine is not). The Z06 is also a good daily driver. you will find that the Z06 suspension will be a little tighter than that of the standard coupe or roadster. You did not state the year, but you mentioned Electron Blue which came out in '02 so you will have 55 more horses under the hood than you standard Corvette, so the gas mileage may be a little less than a standard Vette, but it will also depend on how you drive and where you drive.
So to sum it up, yes the Z06 is more performance car than the coupe or roadster, but it is still a great street car or daily driver.
The thing I like about the Z06 is the trunk, we travel about15,000 miles a year and are gone 10 to 14 days at a time. At speed (70-75) we get 28-30 mpg, now if you put your foot in her, that go's away quick.
The Z06 is going to ride a bit firmer. You will definitely "feel" more of the road. Also, the transmission ratios are a bit shorter and closer in the Z06.
I've had a couple of coupes and now have an EB Z06 like you are looking for. BTW, I was never too crazy about colors but I really dig the EB on a Z06. Sounds like others have addressed the major differences. Your getting a little more horsepower, a stiffer ride, a slightly lighter and louder car. Some of that weight was sound insulation so the transmission will be slightly louder. The seats have less settings (I had the nice sport seats in my last coupe). The transmission has different gearing. I find 6th gear to be more useable in the Z. Basically as I have heard others describe the Z, its a rawer feeling car. With the Z you are trading up a little less comfort for a little more added performance.
I am realyy happy with my Z. The only thing I miss about the coupes is the targa top and the slightly larger trunk.
I'm getting 24 MPG highway in the Z06 I just picked up... SLP Blackwing + Full exhaust, otherwise stock 6 speed...
Clean the air filter. I just picked one up to, and I don't know which did it, but I changed a nasty *** air filter on the stock setup and also went to longtubes and no cats and an x-pipe, and I went from 24 to 27mpg hwy. Both figures are over the same stretches of road and the same speeds and general lack of traffic.
My Z06 actually gets better MPG than my convertible because it is tuned and modified more extensively. The Z06 has different gear ratios in every gear but 4th where they are both 1:1.
The Z06 is actually much easier to drive in traffic in my opinion because I can hold higher gears longer as we slow and the higher torque requires much less throttle use.
Soon the vert will be more modified than the Z so it won't matter. I will tell you that with my modified Z versus my intake/exhaust Vert there is so much difference in acceleration it almost isn't funny.
You probably can't go wrong either way, just depends on what you want.
This is one of the hardest questions out there! I will be the first roadster to input my side. I love the car with the top down, its a six speed and has good power. I like to be versitile, the Z06 is what I would want for its performance but having a vert overtakes that! Power? Problem solved, I plan on inserting a supercharger under the hood incognito! Now have the best of both worlds. I am not too sure on the differences in cornering but my Z51 setup seems more than enough for running the curved roads here in Washington. Bottom like is I want the best of both cars in one! The C6's come closer to that but I just think the C5 still has the better looks. That said it still depends on what you use the car for, if you are into competition events stick with the Z06 (I am sure its sospension setup would be a better improvement to the Z51, right?), for me I wanted a daily driver, weekend get away car with 500 plus hp with the top down.
Buy the Z and convert it, bar non best of both worlds. For trips, my 98 coupe was great and storage was easily accessed by the significant other, but that's the only trade-off I can think of going to convertible:
Last edited by jaguar5822; Sep 1, 2011 at 02:19 PM.
Well the Vert came up today. So I'll know on the 13th if I have it. Not sure why they are listing the auction for so long. Thanks for all the responces. We shall see what happens.
From a pure thermodynamics standpoint, a Z06 should get better gas milage than the roadster or coupe. This is because compression ratio is in the numerator of the efficiency formula, and the Z06 has a higher compression ratio.
A diesel engine's high efficiency is due completely from its high compression ratio.
Interesting, about gas but there isn't much real difference and I am not sure but doesn't the none Z06 with its gear ratio and lower hp when @ 60-65 run at a lower RPM? I would think the Z would get less gas milage, course if I run with the top down suppose areodynamics go down. But seriously the dif can't be more that 2-3 mpg, I for one just take the current mpgs as a benifit thanks to great engineering, I am getting constant 28mpg on a 44 mile comute. Alos, as far as trunk space, it is only noticalbe with the top down and still there is plenty of room for lugage for two people, dont see it as an issue unless you doing family grocery shopping!
I LOVE MY VERT!!! (As you guys love your Z's) Lets face it you can't go wrong with a C5!
From a pure thermodynamics standpoint, a Z06 should get better gas milage than the roadster or coupe. This is because compression ratio is in the numerator of the efficiency formula, and the Z06 has a higher compression ratio.
A diesel engine's high efficiency is due completely from its high compression ratio.
The Z06 has a more aggressive cam though too; the difference in mpg is mostly due to gearing and on the highway being less aerodynamic than the coupe. The compression ratio alone doesn't change it much, but all the little things add up when you consider the lighter wheels and lower overall weight.
Originally Posted by MrGary2011
Alos, as far as trunk space, it is only noticalbe with the top down and still there is plenty of room for lugage for two people, dont see it as an issue unless you doing family grocery shopping!
I LOVE MY VERT!!! (As you guys love your Z's) Lets face it you can't go wrong with a C5!
I was talking about being able to access stuff while driving. I suppose we could custom make very small storage compartments that wouldn't hinder the function of the top, but still nowhere near the utility of the coupe for road trips. And Amen to that the C5 is by far the best car I've ever owned, though I had 4 4th-gen Fbodies and a Lincoln to compare it to
That is pretty bad for a Z06 on the highway. Those mods are really eating into your gas milage, plus detracting from the excellent stock drivability.
Drivability is actually fantastic. Then again, I'm coming from a 4 Cyl with plenty of turbo lag, so I've no baseline to compare with. Car just seems to be gulping down gas. My gauge currently reads just under half tank, 130miles since fill up, mainly city driving. I'm not driving aggressively, but I'm not noticing any misfires or unusual engine activity, so I'm thinking it might be that it's still on stock tune and the LTs are messing up the fuel maps, or the O2 sensors are getting lazy. No related DIC codes or CEL either. 13.5 mpg according to the DIC.
I purchased a 98 6 speed Z51 Convertible in 1998 as a retirement present to myself and traded in a 95 6 sop Z51 Coupe for it...
I currently own 6 Corvettes and this car is just fine...My younger Brother purchased a 2001 Z06 when he retired in 2001 ...
To be honest there is not a heck of a lot of difference in how the cars drive.the Z51 suspension is the performance suspension yet it is not as stiff as my brothers Z06...of course his is a little faster but the feeling in my rear end is not that different when I shove my right foot down on the gas in either car...
Both of us are too old to be street racing anymore...
Bob G
63 72 & 98 Convertibles
76 79 & 88 (35th anni) Coupes
I've owned both C5 targa and Z06. My first C5 was an 00 targa auto. This car hooked me for life. great acceleration, good driveablility and I averaged 28 mpg over the 50k miles I drove it before selling. Owned a 97 targa 6 spd for a few months and I really enjoyed it but had to have the Z06. I'm 30k miles into my Z06 and love it! it ends up being a personal preference. I like the fact that the Z is quieter in respect to wind noise and I think the flat back glass makes the car look really good, but some roads make me think twice about the stiffer suspension.
Bottom line- you can't go wrong either way. take a 20-30 minute drive in each car, decide which is best for you. regardless, you will enjoy the vette like no other car.