[Z06] Coilover suspension?
The best,
John :hat

/rob
BTW, I bought the car to autocross and take on the track, as well as drive around for fun, which is why I'm considering it.
thanks
thanks
A) they are adjustable for corner weight.
B) the springs have lower hysteresis loss.
A means that you can get both front and both rear tires to carry the same weight with the driver sitting in the drivers seat.
B means that the suspension can be keep the tires on the road a little bit better over bumps and dips.
Combined with better than stock shocks, you can dial in different compression/rebound settings to aid the drivers style of driving.
How does it fair with the Vette's Traction Control System?
What do all of you think the handling would be in comparison to a M5 or Ferrari?
Curious - I'm thinking about upgrading to Coilovers.
:cheers:
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
1. Are you now driving at a skill level that the stock suspension is limiting your performance?
2. Are you competing or intending to compete in a class where the competition is utilizing expensive and extensive suspension mods that give them an advantage?
The stock ZO6 spring/sway/shock setup is easily capable of running quicker laps than most anything you will encounter at a driver school, costing less than $75,000, and a few costing much more. Autocross rules will demand you remain pretty stock (no coil overs) unless you want to run an unlimited class against lightweight race cars.
I drive the bejeezus out of my car at drivers schools and have a complete blast passing virtually everything, sometimes twice. I run stock suspension (lowered of course on stock adjusters) including tires, and can outrun most anything, even those with race rubber, I have run across. Unless I were racing, I wouldn't do much more than a set of single adjustable Penske shocks (not coil-overs) and T1 sway bars, plus a set of Hoosier race tires mounted on super-light rims. Might consider a Baer brake kit to top this off, you can never have enough brakes... The springs and spring configuration is not a problem that needs fixing on the car, IMHO. :cheers:
1. Are you now driving at a skill level that the stock suspension is limiting your performance?
2. Are you competing or intending to compete in a class where the competition is utilizing expensive and extensive suspension mods that give them an advantage?
The stock ZO6 spring/sway/shock setup is easily capable of running quicker laps than most anything you will encounter at a driver school, costing less than $75,000, and a few costing much more. Autocross rules will demand you remain pretty stock (no coil overs) unless you want to run an unlimited class against lightweight race cars.
I drive the bejeezus out of my car at drivers schools and have a complete blast passing virtually everything, sometimes twice. I run stock suspension (lowered of course on stock adjusters) including tires, and can outrun most anything, even those with race rubber, I have run across. Unless I were racing, I wouldn't do much more than a set of single adjustable Penske shocks (not coil-overs) and T1 sway bars, plus a set of Hoosier race tires mounted on super-light rims. Might consider a Baer brake kit to top this off, you can never have enough brakes... The springs and spring configuration is not a problem that needs fixing on the car, IMHO. :cheers:
Part of my motivation on upgrading the suspension was just to add improvement on handling. To max out the Vette's structural design maybe?
The Z06's ride is really sweet, sporty and tight - with some exceptions. When I'm taking a tight 45-90 degree turn I will sometimes hit a small road "blemish" (pot hole, etc.) and then notice a slight hop in the rear. Active handling takes care of this should I be going fairly fast.
My thought on fixing this problem was adding in a set of DRM or Penske type Coilovers. Yes, I get a little extreme - but that is how I like it.
What type of swaybar would be the "Best" on the market - esp. in comparision to the stock Z06 system (which is great mind you!).
Thoughts?
I thought the M5 part was funny...
Just blindly substituting components is a great way to screw up the car while burning up a lot of money.
Springs are basically springs whether they are made out of coiled steel wire or molded composite. Mathematically they are modeled the same way. It's the WHEEL RATE they yield that affects ride and handling. Composite springs do have more inherent damping, but this is compensated when selecting the final damping rates, which are the most subjective parameter. They usually have to be set by experimentation and the optimum will change with average speed, average bumpiness of the course, and driver preference. Higher speeds and bumpier courses generally require more rebound damping.
We've had this discussion before, but I will restate. According to SAE papers written by GM engineers, the C5 shock mounts were only designed to take damping loads and bump stop loads. Adding spring loads to them from coilovers creates the potential to overload them, plus you place increased deflection on the side rail due to the higher average loading. Good design practice calls for loads to be distributed over as wide an area as possible, and this is accomplished in the C5 design by taking spring loads through the crossmembers and tranferring them to the side rails through the cross member mounts, which are remote from the shock mounts.
Typical coilovers allow for easily adjustable ride height and have adjustable damping. This is good. but the the spring rates are fixed. How do they affect the wheel rates, and how does this affect the roll stiffness distribution? This is information that a chassis engineer needs to understand in order to create the dynamic response requested by the driver. This is over and above the shock mount loading issue, which is a showstopper IMO unless the mounts are reinforced.
A showroom stock Z06 will generate about 1.0g lateral on a skidpad and transients of over 1.2 g (look at the numbers in the June Road and Track). How many can really use this car to its full potential? You're best to find and thoroughly define the limits of the OEM setup before you begin a wholesale amateur re-engineering of a superbly engineered sports car.
In the meantime there are tuning parameters to optimize like tire pressure, ride height, and static alignment settings.
Duke
[Modified by SWCDuke, 1:12 PM 5/15/2002]
I agree with basically everything you’re saying. :yesnod: Suspension and chassis deisgn and tuning are VERY sophisticated issues.
However, on the point:
The wider the handling envelope is the more aggressive we can drive a vehicle while not pushing it to the very edge of it’s limit (risking losing control)
You get my idea ;)
[Modified by EuG, 5:34 PM 5/15/2002]
A showroom stock Z06 will generate about 1.0g lateral on a skidpad and transients of over 1.2 g (look at the numbers in the June Road and Track). How many can really use this car to its full potential?
1G IS indeed a lot of cornering capability, but if a car could corner at a maximum of, say, 2Gs than you could make 1.5G turns w/o even braking a sweat (read: while talking on the cell, phone, adjusting your radio and waving that babe you’re passing :D at the same time :cool: )
Ninety percent of the handling equation is tire adhesion and chassis tuning is done to optimize the tires grip characteristics. To get up into the 1.5g range you need real racing tires - slicks. To get much over this you need downforce.
Once you optimize steady state grip and dynamic response with camber settings and anti-roll bars, you start working on transient response - the way the car behaves on corner entry and exit, and on a production car your basic adjustments for transient response are shock absorbers and toe settings.
A few years ago in Car and Driver, Bob Riley was quoted as saying that ninety percent of setting up a car is "reading" shocks. That's Bob Riley of Riley and Scott - one of North America's premier race car designers.
Duke
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/zerothread?id=297937
Also, not all coilover setups are the same. Some of the aftermarket companies are selling poorly developed products. DRM have been putting coilovers on Corvettes since the 1980's and know what they are doing.
The springs keep the car off the ground but are less important in suspension tuning than the shocks and swaybars. I have factory T1 springs and swaybars on my car and have been very pleased with them - future upgrades will focus on upgrading shocks and control arm bushings.
Here's some further food for thought for you. My new 2002 Z06 has just 1500 miles on her. In getting ready for this season's racing, I took her in for a baseline alignment check. Found that right outta the factory I got REALLY screwed up alignment!! No amount of parts and fancy coilovers is gonna fix that!!
So you might just start by making absolutely sure you tires are at correct pressures. + Your alignment is optimized for track running. The Z06 is amazing in and of itself right out of the box!
[Modified by NewVetteLover, 10:02 PM 5/21/2002]



















