C5 "Air Bridge"
Relatively new C5 owner - 2003 Z06, MY with 41k miles. Decided to give myself an early birthday present. Since I'll be turning 25, I probably bring the average age of the forum down a couple of years.

But anywho, I have a question regarding the air bridge on the C5 and aftermarket intakes. Car-wise, I come from a turbocharged import background, so when designing intake piping I'm used to seeing aluminum piping with an emphasis on minimal bends.
I can deal with most reputable aftermarket intakes being plastic - I'm a fan of aluminum, but I've seen the comparisons on IATs and know there is very little difference either way. My preference would be to be blingy aluminum, but I could live with molded plastic.
What I can't understand is aftermarket intakes keeping the air bridge design instead of a standard round piping. Is there really any evidence that this flows better than regular straight piping? This doesn't seem to be a clearance issue since I see most C5 super/turbocharged guys seemingly running 3.5" intake piping with no problems.
My point being I imagine is that I'm having a hard time justifying a $300-$500 intake with, to my eyes, seemingly inferior design (coming from imports where as an example AEM aluminum intakes generally fall in the $200 range with a more complicated pipe design and more raw material) when most Corvette intake aftermarkets place the filter right where the stock one is for double the cost.
Why wouldn't someone pick up a couple of couplers, some pre-bent aluminum, and a high quality filter and make their own in an hour for 35% of the cost?







[IMG]
[/IMG][IMG]
[/IMG]
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Not many chose that option.
Relatively new C5 owner - 2003 Z06, MY with 41k miles. Decided to give myself an early birthday present. Since I'll be turning 25, I probably bring the average age of the forum down a couple of years.

But anywho, I have a question regarding the air bridge on the C5 and aftermarket intakes. Car-wise, I come from a turbocharged import background, so when designing intake piping I'm used to seeing aluminum piping with an emphasis on minimal bends.
I can deal with most reputable aftermarket intakes being plastic - I'm a fan of aluminum, but I've seen the comparisons on IATs and know there is very little difference either way. My preference would be to be blingy aluminum, but I could live with molded plastic.
What I can't understand is aftermarket intakes keeping the air bridge design instead of a standard round piping. Is there really any evidence that this flows better than regular straight piping? This doesn't seem to be a clearance issue since I see most C5 super/turbocharged guys seemingly running 3.5" intake piping with no problems.
My point being I imagine is that I'm having a hard time justifying a $300-$500 intake with, to my eyes, seemingly inferior design (coming from imports where as an example AEM aluminum intakes generally fall in the $200 range with a more complicated pipe design and more raw material) when most Corvette intake aftermarkets place the filter right where the stock one is for double the cost.
Why wouldn't someone pick up a couple of couplers, some pre-bent aluminum, and a high quality filter and make their own in an hour for 35% of the cost?
My C5 has a 3" one off aluminum air bridge (without modifying the radiator, and it just BARELY clears the hood. Pretty sure it rubs the hoodliner.
BTW, a couple weeks ago the boys were camping and daughter-in-law wanted to take 'vette to a basket ball game. On return she said, "I first thought the Nissan (read rice burner) would stay with it, but when I really pushed it I knew there was no comparison."
Last edited by UM Rebel; Mar 19, 2013 at 07:31 PM.
This is good information to have - thanks for that. Doubt I'll take it that far, but just for informational's sake, did ECS sell the bracket for tilting the radiator outside of the supercharger kit to you or did you manage to scrounge it off a supercharger kit part-out?

















