When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Whats up everybody, its my First time posting here. I'm trying to decide between a 2002 Z06 with 66k miles and an aftermarket cam and an '03 with 47k miles. I'm not sure what kind of cam the '02 has as it's from a dealer, but It does come with a 6mo/6k mile warranty and looks to be in great shape from the pictures. The '03 has lower miles, is the 50th anniversary, and is only $200 more than the '02, but from the pictures there looks like there is a very small hole in the driver's seat on the side and the intake tube looks like it rubbed on the hood and has worn down along with leaving a spot on the undercovering of the hood. The '02 looks a lot cleaner all around especially under the hood. The '02 is listed at $22,991 and the '03 is at $23,198. Any thought on which one would be the better bet? Oh yeah, they are both electron blue with black interior. Thanks.
Because its worth more i would get the 03. You can repair the seat or replace it for very little money. The under the hood thing wouldn't bother me since my cold air did the same thing.
I personally would go with the 02 if it is cleaner most likely better taken care of. But the 03 is stock and lower mileage so really what are you looking for in the car?
The '02 was just really clean under the hood. Other than the seat the cars looked to be in the same condition. I'm really leaning towards the '03 as long as the intake rubbing deal isn't going to be a problem. Could it become a problem at all?
Are the '01's not worth it? I have a good deal worked out for one.
'01s are fine, but if it's stock, you are giving up 20HP, and no HUD. Buy the newest and nicest. Anybody can get the engine compartment detailed, so not a reliable way to judge. If color isn't important, I'd go with the lower mile '03, which, depending on whether it's a late model year production, will have a better transmission. BTW, all '03s are 50th Anniv.
I just bought an 02. I wanted an 03 bad. They just dont show up much. I bought the first car that had the best look and was totally square. If you find an 02 like I did that is in perfect shape, I would jump on it. If you have to have an 03 wait for one. You will pay full asking for it. The anniversary year gives the owners a total boner for some reason. From what I can tell the 02 and 03 look identical. Just drive them a lot. You have to like the way they feel. Good luck. Either car is a winner in my opinion.
i've always considered 2001 as its own thing and least desirable, 2002-2003 as the same thing and 2004 as the most desirable. there aren't really any changes in 2003 worth talking about compared to 2002
in 2004 there is a greatly improved pcv system and much better shocks. it also is, of course, newest
With the info that you've been able to offer I'd go with the '03.
It's newer, it's lower miles and it's the anniversary edition. All of these make it more valuable and desirable.
I'd avoid the '01. Unless the deal is really too great to pass up.
The later models had many improvements in the engine.
Good luck in any case and let us know what you decide.
We'll all want to welcome you to the Family when you make the purchase!!
Well I went with the '01. I picked it up Saturday. I plan on doing mods later so this made sense. It was about $5k cheaper than the other too. It has about 72k miles, which I didn't think was too bad. Thanks for all of the input!!!!
I would find out exactly what cam is in the 02 and be sure its up to spec with what you're looking for. Not every cam is made the same lol. Personally, I'd go for the 03 with lower mileage and higher retail value.