When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Very expensive retrofit. Not many would consider it worth the cost. I have selective ride and enjoy the benefits of it. Especially with the bad roads we have in this neck of the woods. My GF would probably leave me if my Corvette did not have selective ride... (Probably the only switch she has complete control of) LOL Greetings, Rob
I bought my 1999 Corvette in 2003, maybe it's just me but I swear the 3 settings don't do anything, my ex said she could tell, I always have it in the performance setting.
If it does anything, it's so subtle I cannot tell, maybe one has to drive on a real rough rode to notice.
2003+ has a different shock/ride than the previous years. It is called magnetic ride system. It was an option. Big difference in ride between touring and sport (only 2 settings). I believe you are right in not noticing any change in ride in your 1999.
I've had the F-45 ride control in 3 of my c5's. Damn if I could tell the difference in any of them when I tried to use it. I don't even bother with it on my current 02. Use your money for something usefull.
Most do not like the selective ride control. The shocks are HEAVY and very expensive to repair/get replacements.
With that being said, I have the F45 on my '02 coupe and really like it. I don't notice a huge difference when in the "Sport" setting however the difference between "Touring" and "Performance" is quite noticeable to me. Especially on uneven roads or bumpy roads the Touring setting is a great thing to have! Until one fails or breaks I'm sticking with em.
A few of the C5's I am looking at have it. Would you consider it a plus or minus when considering a purchase? I don't want something potentially expensive to replace should it crap out, but if it works, it would be very nice.
I had the FX3 system in my '94 and loved it, but I upgraded the actuators and got revalved shocks for better overall performance.
my `03 has the F55 suspension and there's a noticeable difference between Tour and Sport.
Tour makes the car ride like a really nice touring car. It's very smooth and stable.
Sport makes the car ride like a really nice sports car. It's very taut and you feel every bump and ripple in the road.
You should test drive/ride a car with an F55 system to decide whether the ride is worth it to you.
Personally, I like the F55 system and knew about the potential costs when I bought the car.
When I was looking to buy, I test drove a `99 with standard shocks and didn't like how stiff the suspension felt all the time. It's nice to be able to smooth it out with a flip of the switch when I want a smooth ride.
Last edited by DanSavage; Oct 21, 2013 at 06:56 PM.
I have a 2004 with the F55 system. There is a huge difference between the two switch settings, at least there was after I removed the shipping spacers from the rear shocks.
If I wanted the F55 system, I would not even think about trying to add it to a car that did not have it. I would sell my car, and buy one that came with the system from the factory. I suspect the overall cost, effort, and odds that the F55 will work properly would favor simply buying a car that already has it.
I have a 2004 with the F55 system. There is a huge difference between the two switch settings, at least there was after I removed the shipping spacers from the rear shocks.
What?! You didn't like the ride quality of pipe-foam insulation?
Whenever I buy my next new Vette, It will NOT have magnetic selective ride control. All the failure/repair/does not do anything stories have convinced me it's a bad idea made possible thru excellent engineering.