considering getting another C5
I've missed the C5 off and on over the last couple of years - it looked great and ran great (almost all the time) but the little nagging problems I had with it (and the larger more expensive ones) really soured me on the model. Now that more time has passed, I've done some digging and found a way to get past those issues.
I've found a "rolling chassis" early coupe near me that I'm going to go look at on Thursday. I've also found a few different crunched C5 Z06's that can be had for dirt cheap. One or two of those that are damaged beyond repair would supply me with all of the later running gear that I want (wide-ratio trans, 3-rib diff, better torque tube and of course the LS6) plus a lot of the small parts I'd need to rebuild the couple. I'd also be able to do things like wide fenders, Radio Flyer Light Cannons, some good seats, a Tiger Shark style rear bumper and paint it Nassau Blue Metallic. Since this would be my secondary project rather than my daily driver I would have time to work on it rather than have to keep it running so that I can go to work the next day. Of course now that I have a real garage instead of living in an apartment things have improved there as well.
I'll also be able to make sure that it doesn't have some of the really bad things that my previous C5 had like auto climate control and the memory package. Fixing the stupid clutch slave won't be a $5000 project since all the drive train will already be out of the car. Speaking of which, while it's out I'm going to see what I can do to build a short shifter that will be quiet like stock (and not rattle like hell the way the notchy aftermarket ones do) but still give crisper, shorter shift throws. I'd like to do C6Z06 brakes and a set of silver C6 GS wheels. Halo tails, all LED lights and a fix for the constant burning out of the DRL's are also on the list.
So, that's my update for now - we'll see what happens. It's just a plan and I tend to plan for a long time and think out loud a lot but that's just me.
Also, don't you mean close ratio transmission referring to the Z06 tranny?





As for the trans ratios, the gears are lower to start with and have a little more of a drop between gears which is what has traditionally been called a wide-ratio transmission. The reduced OD ratios also help performance (responsiveness). I could care less if it goes 170 or 175 on the top end as I'll never be driving it that fast.
Gear LS1/MM6 LS6/M12
1st Gear 2.66:1 2.97:1
2nd Gear 1.78:1 2.07:1
3rd Gear 1.30:1 1.43:1
4th Gear 1.00:1 1.00:1
5th Gear 0.74:1 0.84:1
6th Gear 0.50:1 0.56:1
Last edited by mcm95403; Feb 26, 2014 at 11:18 AM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
To paraphrase another CF poster, these cars are not investments. They are rolling tributes to awesomeness.

I look at mine as a hobby. As such, the returns I get for the money I spend is in the enjoyment I derive from driving it, tinkering with it, cleaning it, polishing it, looking at it, etc.
As for the trans ratios, the gears are lower to start with and have a little more of a drop between gears which is what has traditionally been called a wide-ratio transmission. The reduced OD ratios also help performance (responsiveness). I could care less if it goes 170 or 175 on the top end as I'll never be driving it that fast.
Gear LS1/MM6 LS6/M12
1st Gear 2.66:1 2.97:1
2nd Gear 1.78:1 2.07:1
3rd Gear 1.30:1 1.43:1
4th Gear 1.00:1 1.00:1
5th Gear 0.74:1 0.84:1
6th Gear 0.50:1 0.56:1
If I were you I'd snap up those Z06 parts cars whether I had a car to use them on or not because they would be super buys!
My memory often fails me, but I always thought that close ratio transmissions had gear sets where there was less of a drop in the ratio from one gear to the next which would tend to keep rpm drop less and help keep the engine in it's power band longer. The actual differences in the amount of drop between the M6 and the M12 is less than I thought and the real advantage comes from the lower gearing over all rather than the spacing.
My memory often fails me, but I always thought that close ratio transmissions had gear sets where there was less of a drop in the ratio from one gear to the next which would tend to keep rpm drop less and help keep the engine in it's power band longer. The actual differences in the amount of drop between the M6 and the M12 is less than I thought and the real advantage comes from the lower gearing over all rather than the spacing.
If you swapped out the Z06 trans in place of an LS1 trans in the same car, it would accelerate quicker and have a slightly lower top speed because of the transmission ratios. The wider ratios (especially if you increase the torque output with say - a supercharger
) let the engine use its torque to accelerate you rather than having to try to keep the RPM up in a more "peaky" engine. I prefer a fat torque curve to something that makes power like a 2-stroke.



















