When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'm considering a 2002 C5 convertible but my past experience with other converts were disappointing. I found the chassis' flexed causing an awkward feeling. I would like some input comparing the removable top model.
I have a 2001 Vert and a 2004 Coupe (removable roof) - I have no twisting issue with either one. Both are stock. With the tube construction introduced with the C5 I believe the twisting is a thing of the past.
I'm considering a 2002 C5 convertible but my past experience with other converts were disappointing. I found the chassis' flexed causing an awkward feeling. I would like some input comparing the removable top model.
My 69' Vette and my current C5 are fine. The 69' rode STIFF though, not nearly as smooth as the C5
As Ive said many times, SOME people think 1960's technology still lives in our C5.. back in the 60's and up into the 90's a convertible frame typically was 200 lbs heavier with an added X frame support added for rigidity... That's why some old school mechanics still living in the 60's will tell owners to open their doors before lifting their corvette.. these mechanics are living in the distant past...
As Far as the C5 goes..In 1997, the fifth-generation Corvette represented the first true breakthrough in automotive hydroforming technology with industry-first twin seamless hydroformed frame rails. Each rail began as a piece of 18-foot-long six-inch diameter tubing, and replaced the previous model's 14-piece stamped and spot-welded rails. The frame rails gave the Corvette unprecedented stiffness - a 450 percent improvement - and dramatically improved ride and handling while reducing weight and improving step-in height. It also saved us some $25 million in tooling costs.
This hydroforming procedure was accomplishes at out Pontiac Mich facility, but has since moved in house at Bowling Green.
With a 450% increase in strength there is no need to reinforce the frame for a convertible.
My Convertible '02 is as stiff as my race car. Jack up one corner and two more tires will lift off the ground, and this car has no cage! Forget about any twist, they got the C5 right.
I am no expert, but I've test driven a handful of convertibles and they all twist in ways that make them very undesirable as a sports car. Not the C5. It's as rigid as you could possibly want it to be. For all the pissing and moaning about little stuff (no cup holder), they nailed this big item.
Who needs a cup holder. GM put two cup holders in the new Camaros and they are useless! MY elbow and arm will hit anything in them more than 3 inches high. Maybe useful for an automatic, but useless for a manual.
Who needs a cup holder. GM put two cup holders in the new Camaros and they are useless! MY elbow and arm will hit anything in them more than 3 inches high. Maybe useful for an automatic, but useless for a manual.
As Ive said many times, SOME people think 1960's technology still lives in our C5.. back in the 60's and up into the 90's a convertible frame typically was 200 lbs heavier with an added X frame support added for rigidity... That's why some old school mechanics still living in the 60's will tell owners to open their doors before lifting their corvette.. these mechanics are living in the distant past...
As Far as the C5 goes..In 1997, the fifth-generation Corvette represented the first true breakthrough in automotive hydroforming technology with industry-first twin seamless hydroformed frame rails. Each rail began as a piece of 18-foot-long six-inch diameter tubing, and replaced the previous model's 14-piece stamped and spot-welded rails. The frame rails gave the Corvette unprecedented stiffness - a 450 percent improvement - and dramatically improved ride and handling while reducing weight and improving step-in height. It also saved us some $25 million in tooling costs.
This hydroforming procedure was accomplishes at out Pontiac Mich facility, but has since moved in house at Bowling Green.
With a 450% increase in strength there is no need to reinforce the frame for a convertible.
This thread should have ended with this post..........