When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
We have a 1998 coupe and it has bridgestone potenza re050 tires. I wanted to know what was stock from the factory and best place to buy them now.
Thanks!
We have a 1998 coupe and it has bridgestone potenza re050 tires. I wanted to know what was stock from the factory and best place to buy them now.
Thanks!
Why the heck would you want oem run craps...I mean run flats on your car? MANY better options...nitto, hankook, ect... Google search c5 tires
[QUOTE=bruceg2016;1592401939]We have a 1998 coupe and it has bridgestone potenza re050 tires. I wanted to know what was stock from the factory and best place to buy them
Tire Type Goodyear EMT F1 High-Performance
Front Tires P245/40ZR-17
Rear Tires P275/40ZR-18
Last edited by Murray Anderson; Jun 11, 2016 at 04:17 PM.
Thanks...I understood the question, just couldn't get passed why anyone would want them if, they know there are better options....
I don't understand the hatred towards runflats.
I'm sure GM's engineers took into account weight, handling characteristics, horsepower and a ton of other things into consideration when they decided runflats were the tire of choice.
I get that was 15-20 years but as of today, most, if not all BMW's come with the same runflats from the factory. I'll take the extra cost associated with getting home/to a service shop over trying to flat-deck it or hope that when I pull out my compressor the aux power still works.
I don't understand the hatred towards runflats.
I'm sure GM's engineers took into account weight, handling characteristics, horsepower and a ton of other things into consideration when they decided runflats were the tire of choice.
I get that was 15-20 years but as of today, most, if not all BMW's come with the same runflats from the factory. I'll take the extra cost associated with getting home/to a service shop over trying to flat-deck it or hope that when I pull out my compressor the aux power still works.
What they fail to tell you is that if you drive any miles at all on a deflated runflat you will more than likely have to replace the tire. The structural integrity is gone. And since tires usually need to be replaced in pairs a simple puncture can result in the purchase of 2 new tires. This happened to my neighbor and his BMW when he ran over a nail. It was a very costly nail.
GM went with the runflat because there is no room for a spare and it's a great way to sell more tires.
I don't understand the hatred towards runflats.
I'm sure GM's engineers took into account weight, handling characteristics, horsepower and a ton of other things into consideration when they decided runflats were the tire of choice.
I get that was 15-20 years but as of today, most, if not all BMW's come with the same runflats from the factory. I'll take the extra cost associated with getting home/to a service shop over trying to flat-deck it or hope that when I pull out my compressor the aux power still works.
I don't hate them...and if someone runs them that's cool...but, they should be aware that they are a rougher ride and are noisy as they age because they are a tougher rubber and a stiffer sidewall....with the TPMS you can monitor the pressure frequently or the TPMS will give you a heads up if you have an issue...normally a nail or some other puncture type leak can be aired up and you can continue on to a shop that can repair...blowout is a whole different deal, but that would be true for a run flat also...if the op wants to put run flats on his car... It's his car and he should do what makes him happy...I just wanted to make him aware...although he might not need it...that there are IMHO better options
[QUOTE=73Corvette;1592402438]I don't hate them...and if someone runs them that's cool...but, they should be aware that they are a rougher ride and are noisy as they age because they are a tougher rubber and a stiffer sidewall....
Humm, not my experience with my run flats. I had them replaced this year because the inside tread was cracking. They were 7 years old. I replaced them with NITTO INVO. I did not notice a difference in the ride or the tire noise between the two tire types. It was the price difference that made me buy the non run flats. Although I did by a small compressor for those times that a nail is in the tire.
I don't hate them...and if someone runs them that's cool...but, they should be aware that they are a rougher ride and are noisy as they age because they are a tougher rubber and a stiffer sidewall....
Humm, not my experience with my run flats. I had them replaced this year because the inside tread was cracking. They were 7 years old. I replaced them with NITTO INVO. I did not notice a difference in the ride or the tire noise between the two tire types. It was the price difference that made me buy the non run flats. Although I did by a small compressor for those times that a nail is in the tire.
I think the tire brand can make a BIG difference...see a lot of the pilot sport run flat reviews that are very positive I have done sooooo much sound deadening that shouldn't be an issue for me but, I sure like a nice smooth ride... Road condition makes a huge difference also...we have some of the crappiest roads in the country....
I don't hate them...and if someone runs them that's cool...but, they should be aware that they are a rougher ride and are noisy as they age because they are a tougher rubber and a stiffer sidewall....
Humm, not my experience with my run flats. I had them replaced this year because the inside tread was cracking. They were 7 years old. I replaced them with NITTO INVO. I did not notice a difference in the ride or the tire noise between the two tire types. It was the price difference that made me buy the non run flats. Although I did by a small compressor for those times that a nail is in the tire.
It's nice to finally hear cost was the major issue.
I might be wrong (I'm sure someone will point it out) but sidewall stiffness would not create more noise.
However it is true that basically driving even at low speeds for a short distances itch little to no air will toast the tire.
I don't hate them...and if someone runs them that's cool...but, they should be aware that they are a rougher ride and are noisy as they age because they are a tougher rubber and a stiffer sidewall....
Humm, not my experience with my run flats. I had them replaced this year because the inside tread was cracking. They were 7 years old. I replaced them with NITTO INVO. I did not notice a difference in the ride or the tire noise between the two tire types. It was the price difference that made me buy the non run flats. Although I did by a small compressor for those times that a nail is in the tire.
I believe someone had questioned you on your personal experiences with these tires. Run, run as fast and far away as possible because you will devote maybe 5-10 minutes of unretrievable time trying to explain to him his beliefs aren't necessarily correct.
Last edited by Murray Anderson; Jun 11, 2016 at 06:31 PM.
Are you saying you went from 7 year old runflats to brand new non-runflats and didn't notice any difference whatsoever in either ride or tire noise between the two sets? Seriously? I find that very hard to believe.
Not what I said. I went from run flats (7 year old GY's) to new non run flats (NITTO INVO) and did not notice any noticeable difference in ride or noise. I could not understand the complaints on the run flats since I felt they were not any different than my DD running Coopers.
Huh? That's exactly what you said, which was that you went from 7 year old runflats to brand new non-runflats and didn't notice any difference in ride or noise. You've said it twice now, so how can you say "Not what I said"? Still