Buying dilemma
I'd say take the vert, I'm the OO of 2000 vert 6spd now with 45K on it. It's mostly a weekend car with trips out to the country, curvy roads. After 17 years I've had 3 issues, 1) column lock, 2) AC hose under the battery issue, and 3) vert window coming off, twice and it looks like I'm going to have to do it again.
What you should do is find and test drive a vert with a 6 speed. I love shifting and I do drive my vette pretty hard so that's how I get my kicks.
Good Luck!!!
I'd say take the vert, I'm the OO of 2000 vert 6spd now with 45K on it. It's mostly a weekend car with trips out to the country, curvy roads. After 17 years I've had 3 issues, 1) column lock, 2) AC hose under the battery issue, and 3) vert window coming off, twice and it looks like I'm going to have to do it again.
What you should do is find and test drive a vert with a 6 speed. I love shifting and I do drive my vette pretty hard so that's how I get my kicks.
Good Luck!!!

We did drive some coupes before driving the 04 vert... I was surprised that the Vert was quieter than the coupes! I think the coupe hatch acts like a mini amphitheater and forces all the sound to the front of the cabin...not sure about the Z06 we didn't drive one, probably a good thing or we wouldn't have a Vert
I'd say take the vert, I'm the OO of 2000 vert 6spd now with 45K on it. It's mostly a weekend car with trips out to the country, curvy roads. After 17 years I've had 3 issues, 1) column lock, 2) AC hose under the battery issue, and 3) vert window coming off, twice and it looks like I'm going to have to do it again.
What you should do is find and test drive a vert with a 6 speed. I love shifting and I do drive my vette pretty hard so that's how I get my kicks.
Good Luck!!!
With your input/feedback, I'll eliminate the 1998 (parts availability) and the 2000 convertible (price too high, and parts availability).
With your input/feedback, I'll eliminate the 1998 (parts availability) and the 2000 convertible (price too high, and parts availability).
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Oh, yea, and I am waaaay past that age you mentioned. On the other hand I have looked after myself and never worn out any body parts by doing crazy unnecessary stuff like exercise, so everything still works with zero aches or pains. Besides the M6 clutch is not at all heavy. The Subaru's is heavier - go figure.
Last edited by jackthelad; Jun 25, 2016 at 04:17 PM.
Prices are pretty good in your area. They are going crazy here.
As always have any car inspected if you can.
BTW mine is a mn6. Can't image having an auto but to each their own.
Plus if you've done your homework you know they made many significant improvements in the 04 you just need to make sure the VIN is NOT in the affected cars with the gas tank crossover issue or that it's been addressed...Originally Posted by 8VETTE7 View Post
GM had some issues with the gas tanks in a range of VIN's made between Oct 8 2003 and March 18, 2004. VIN range is 45110258 through 45125500.
Many cars in that range developed fuel tank leaks like this:
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/albu...ictureid=42084
Potentially any car in that VIN range can still have the problem.
NHTSA let GM off the hook by allowing them to issue a "Special Coverage Adjustment" rather than forcing a recall of vehicles in the VIN range. That special coverage was a 10 year or 100,000 mile warranty, which ever came first, on failure of the fuel tank. The 10 years has gone by so now anyone that has a failure pays out of pocket for repairs. Typical dealer charges will be around $2500 for replacement of the tank and associated parts. Usually only the drivers side tank fails.
There were a couple recent threads by members whose car experienced the problem after the 10 year period and GM refused any help on payment for repairs.
Basically you take the risk of having to pay out of pocket for this repair should it happen to a car in the suspect VIN range if you purchase one that has NOT already been serviced. GMVIS will have info if the repair HAS been done on any car you may be interested that is within the suspect VIN range
You will also note there were a number of issues with these cars that were addressed in 2001 to the end of the run if you are looking for future reliability and the ability to get the car serviced I'd suggest going with the newest model year possible. That being said however the newest cars are now 12 years old and Chevrolet has discontinued a number of parts for these cars. I recently needed to get my steering rack replaced. I was lucky and found one (rebuilt). With this part you either have to go onto a waiting list or remove it and send it out to be rebuilt i.e. you car will be down for a week or two. That all being said I love my car and love to drive it.

I'm ok with an auto. I've had enough 6 spd cars and shifted gears long enough. That said, I'm going to be swapping my auto to a M6 in the coming weeks.
When I was shopping for my current car, there were 3 things I did not want. I had had enough of cars with the top open, did not want an automatic trans, and I hate red cars.
Mine is a red auto vert.
Ok, I drove it and liked it, and I've now had it for 4 years and still love it. To be honest, I'm swapping to a manual, not to get rid of the auto and shift gears, but because I got a good deal on an entire driveline for it and I like wrenching on cars. There is no good reason for it. And today I ate a DQ Bananna Split Blizzard on the way home, in the car. Try that in an M6.
Some here seem to think the 00 Vert is over priced, and perhaps it is. I would say this. If you drove all of them and you are still saying that one is the nicest of the bunch, it's likely that it's more about who owned it than what car it is. I just had a person drive mine this past week who works on a LOT of vettes and drives a lot of them. Said mine is head and shoulders nicer than any he's been in.
Care, maintenance, not beating the crap out of it, makes a difference.Cars with a manual trans imo, get a lot more abuse. And that translates to the suspension, rattles, general ride of the car including how bad the shocks have been beat. Just everything. And cars with an auto turn less RPMs by a good bit. Get a car from someone who doesn't beat the hell out of it and a auto will be shifted before 2K most all the time. Even if you get on it a little, it'll rarely get t 4K. That adds up over 15 or 18 years.
The Vert is also a fairly expensive option when new, thus it'll generally bring more. Depends on what you like, and what you are willing to drive. Also how well you deal with peer pressure. I hear all the time folks looking down their nose at my car cause it's an auto. I don't care, I just tell them I have an M6 car too and I prefer this one. Take that ****! (truth be told, the M6 is an F body, not a Y, but it's still true).
I'd pick either #1 or #4.
Last edited by K-Spaz; Jun 26, 2016 at 09:22 PM.
Anyway, sold my C4 and now ready to pull the trigger on a C5. I've test drove and researched the heck out of this and narrowed down the choices to 5 possibilities. If anyone can help me eliminate a few or elevate a few it would be most appreciated.
#1: 2004 Coupe, 6 speed, 64K miles, silver, very good cond. $13,500
#2: 2004 Coupe, auto, 75K miles, red, good cond. $14,000
#3: 2001 Coupe, auto, 52K miles, silver, very good cond, $14,000
#4: 2000 Convertible, auto, 61K miles, blue/tan top, excl cond $15,500
#5: 1998 Coupe, auto, 54K miles, red, good cond, $11,600
I like them all with the blue convertible probably most eye appealing and in the best overall cond. My budget is $15K and the 2000 convertible is form at $15,500.
Please, advise needed...




















