When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I just purchased a 2003 Z06 and I seem to hit the rev limiter just before red line, is this normal? I did a search and saw that the limiter happens at 6450 rpm?? is that right? I have had two other c5's and typically the limiter is a factor after red line. I would appreciate any input.
In the first two gears it is quite common to see the tach read lower than redline... The tach gauge is damped and can't swing fast enough in low gears...
Works correctly in the higher gears... check the HUD... it reads correctly..
mike
I just purchased a 2003 Z06 and I seem to hit the rev limiter just before red line, is this normal? I did a search and saw that the limiter happens at 6450 rpm?? is that right? I have had two other c5's and typically the limiter is a factor after red line. I would appreciate any input.
For WOT or near WOT, try shifting at tach indicated ~6200 in 1st & 2nd, preparing to shift at ~6000.
A possible PCM software fix would be to measure the RPM rate of change, and perform a correction based on the rate and filtered RPM (or perhaps use a Kalman or other predictive filter, instead of a simple FIR or IIR as apparently (currently) implemented).
Yeah if I don't make the attempt to shift at 6k RPM or so in 1st/2nd I will bounce off the rev limiter. Lazy tach, thats all, same thing happened in my 99 TransAm.
Most computer upgrades will allow you to increase the rev limiter RPMs. The engine will start to fall off at about 6,700 RPM, you can feel it and shift. You don't want to consistantly bounce off of a 7,000 RPM rev limiter but you should learn it quickly.
For WOT or near WOT, try shifting at tach indicated ~6200 in 1st & 2nd, preparing to shift at ~6000.
A possible PCM software fix would be to measure the RPM rate of change, and perform a correction based on the rate and filtered RPM (or perhaps use a Kalman or other predictive filter, instead of a simple FIR or IIR as apparently (currently) implemented).
Given the powerful active handling software, one would think that a software correction for tach (filter/lag) error would have been implemented if possible. Perhaps the issue is the tach hardware response rate? It sounds like the aftermarket shift lights work well (easier to see than the HUD shift message, and RPM adjustable). Anyone tried an aftermarket tach?
I payed more attention to the tach vs hud yesterday and the hud seems like it is more accurate(never knew there was a shift light). I agree with johnc5 that the analog tach really shouldn't be off considering the electronic technology in the car. 50k for a car to have the tach off just doesn't seem right. this is my third c5 (1st z) and i've never had this problem. it's just an annoyance that i don't want to deal with.
I payed more attention to the tach vs hud yesterday and the hud seems like it is more accurate(never knew there was a shift light). I agree with johnc5 that the analog tach really shouldn't be off considering the electronic technology in the car. 50k for a car to have the tach off just doesn't seem right. this is my third c5 (1st z) and i've never had this problem. it's just an annoyance that i don't want to deal with.
I agree that engine instrumention should be accurate. However, if the problem is the tach hardware, and GM's supplier can't (couldn't) fix the problem in a cost effective way, then the problem won't (didn't) get fixed. Hopefully the issue is fixed in the C6 and C6-Z06.
Or shift at around 6200 indicated (start your shift action as the needle sweeps by 6000). Sure, it's a bummer that the tach is not accurate, but the work-around isn't too bad. It would be interesting to know if it's a hardware or software issue (and whether a fix is even possible).