When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Im on the fence but heavily leanin towards switching my run flats which aare now near bald to Non run flats...I know pretty much most will say go for it as many have switched up. I am probly goin to get the Kuhmos....yes? no?
Is there ANY reason to stay with runflats??? (other then maybe peace f mind)...any and all advice is much appreciated.thanks!
There are many people who have gone to non-run flats and can't believe how much better the car handles. Others appreciate the quieter ride from the non-run flats.
On the other hand, there are many of us who don't mind the run flats and really enjoy the peace of mind knowing we won't be stuck on the side of the road. It is really a personal decision on how much risk, or bother, you are willing to accept if you get a flat tire.
Quick response. I just changed from my second set of EMT's to Michelin non run flat Pilots. I was not impressed with the noise reduction, and I lost what I consider a more important issue and that is "run flat capability"
I've switched to KUHMO Run Flats about a month ago and love 'em.
Much better than the stock run flats...a lot quieter, and lot more traction. I keep 'em at about 32 lbs in the rears, 29 lbs in the fronts.
The tire place told me to keep about 33 lbs all the way around, but
I think it was a bit too harsh on the expressways....
Is there really that much of a difference in the performance aspects of a non RF vs. a RF? I really don't think so. Perhaps if you took a very experienced pro autoX'er and let him run an identical road course in the same C5, once w/RF's and once w/non RF's, you may see a "slight" difference in ET. With that said, unless you are a highly experienced road racer and extremely involved in autoX events, it is my humble opinion that the benefits of the RF's highly outweigh the "infinitesimal" performance benefits of the non RF's.
Is there really that much of a difference in the performance aspects of a non RF vs. a RF? I really don't think so. Perhaps if you took a very experienced pro autoX'er and let him run an identical road course in the same C5, once w/RF's and once w/non RF's, you may see a "slight" difference in ET. With that said, unless you are a highly experienced road racer and extremely involved in autoX events, it is my humble opinion that the benefits of the RF's highly outweigh the "infinitesimal" performance benefits of the non RF's.
Ya know wut I'm sayin?
Far superior ride, vastly reduced bump steer, signifigant reduction in noise, big increase in wet and dry traction. All for 1/2 the price of Goodyear RFs. Not sure what part of that is "infinitesimal"
I went from the the stock GY runflats to the Kuhmos and I love them. Couldnt be happier with them.
Me too--am on my second week with them. Put together a patch kit (search and you will find this info) and enjoy the better performance and ride--if that's what you are into; otherwise stick with EMT's.
This is a tough question and there is probably no one right answer. Everyone's needs and desires will be different.
In my opinion, there is a "big" difference in performance, but my perception is obviously biased as that is almost exclusively what I use my Z06 for... performance driving. There was recently an article in one of the major car mags that did a head to head comparison of the vette suspensions. The vast difference between the Z06 and a stock C5 coupe was greatly minimized when they put Z06 tires on the C5 coupe. Do you really need or want that? Up to you.
Me personally, I don't mind the additional risk for the performance gain, and I did drive my Z06 across country and back with non run-flat Kumho Ecsta MXs on it before my T1 conversion. If I had a coupe, I'd sell the run-flats and buy an inflator kit and a set of non run-flat tires. But that is me.
Another thing to think about is how much cross country driving do you do? If it is a lot, maybe the run-flats are a better option for you.
As a note, I have the Kumho Ecsta MX on my stock wheels and think they are a very good tire, especially for the cost.
I replaced my worn out F1's with Michelin Pilot Sport non run flats last week. Big reduction in road noise and the car handles better. I carry a can of compressed air, fix a flat, tire repair plugs and rubber cement.
I chose Michelin PS runflats because mine is a daily driver. If I was driving it a couple of times a month I might have gone with non-runflats. IMO the person you want to talk to is the person that has gone to non GY runflats and not liked them so switched to non-runflats. I think the majority of people have switched right from the original GY's to non-runflats and don't know how a Michelin or Kumho runflat reacts. My Michelins were like night and day to the GY's.
From: Grace Valley: A small, peaceful & beautiful valley in the Volunteer State
Originally Posted by eddie44
I chose Michelin PS runflats because mine is a daily driver. If I was driving it a couple of times a month I might have gone with non-runflats. IMO the person you want to talk to is the person that has gone to non GY runflats and not liked them so switched to non-runflats. I think the majority of people have switched right from the original GY's to non-runflats and don't know how a Michelin or Kumho runflat reacts. My Michelins were like night and day to the GY's.
Quick response. I just changed from my second set of EMT's to Michelin non run flat Pilots. I was not impressed with the noise reduction, and I lost what I consider a more important issue and that is "run flat capability"
I just replaced mine Friday. Went with GY EMT's (1) because I bought them from a forum member at a really good price and (2) I prefer to keep things basically stock. As with new tires on any vehicle, they're very quiet. And just like any other vehicle with any tire brand, they get louder as they wear. The EMT's may be a bit louder than other brands (I have to take other's word for it) but the peace of mind in staying off the roadsides with a flat overrides my desire for changing. Just my .02
What happens to the air pressure indicators on my instrument panel if I switch to non-stock tires?? Do the other tires have the guages in them? I'm a sissy and kinda like those readouts, but I also find my hand held tire guage gives a one or two psi different read. Which is more accurate?
What happens to the air pressure indicators on my instrument panel if I switch to non-stock tires?? Do the other tires have the guages in them? I'm a sissy and kinda like those readouts, but I also find my hand held tire guage gives a one or two psi different read. Which is more accurate?
The air pressure sensor is on the valve stem and works fine with other tires.
I'm glad someone brought up the tire sensors issue. If I switch to non-run flats, Can I remove the sensors easily so that I can use "fix a flat" if need be? What would the computer do and can that be disabled?
I have the Michelin All Season run flats and love them. But mine is a daily driver that has made several cross country trips (on an extened one now thanks to Francis), so I want the run flats. From what I have been told by friends who have switched, the fix a flat type products will mess up the sensors, and should not be used.