Corvettes and Harleys




Man, that is my favorite Harley. I don't have a Harley Deuce yet but that's the one I'm getting.. . . some day.
Man, that is my favorite Harley. I don't have a Harley Deuce yet but that's the one I'm getting.. . . some day.

I have a 99 red vette, and an '04 black Superglide. 99% of the reaction from JQ Public is very positive.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
out that I don't get any kicks out of thrashing other peoples rides.
And I congratulate anyone who can afford the vehicle of their dreams!
But lets get things into perspective:
Both the vette and the harley are American icons, that's true, but that’s
all they have in common! The stock vette has not only a lot of
power, but is also very well equipped when it comes to handling and brakes.
And not to be forgotten, are the benefits of a modest weight.
A vette can definitely back up, its good looks.
The stock harley is the complete opposite of that. It has poor handling
and poor brakes. The engine suffers from a serious lack of power,
combined with an enormous obesity. If one didn’t know better, one
would think that they have filled the frame with lead... A harley looks
good, sounds good, but it's all show, and no go!
My point being: You’re comparing apples and oranges. The vette is a
genuine sport car, and the harley is as far away from a sport bike,
as you can possibly get.
/
Didn't mean to turn this into a rant, but I have never understood the attraction of a bike with an engine designed in the 1940s. 45 degree V-twin (think big vibration)? Single carburetor? 5500 RPM redline? External oil tank? Tiny restrictive mufflers (when you find someone civilized enough to be using mufflers)? Separate gearbox and engine?? Harley Davidson seems to make a virtue of obsolesence. If they took half the money that they put into styling and put it into updating the engine, the bike would be a lot more interesting. They made a good start with the V-Rod, it is only 15 years out of date instead of 50.
Last edited by slwhite; Dec 21, 2004 at 11:48 PM.



Didn't mean to turn this into a rant, but I have never understood the attraction of a bike with an engine designed in the 1940s. 45 degree V-twin (think big vibration)? Single carburetor? 5500 RPM redline? External oil tank? Tiny restrictive mufflers (when you find someone civilized enough to be using mufflers)? Separate gearbox and engine?? Harley Davidson seems to make a virtue of obsolesence. If they took half the money that they put into styling and put it into updating the engine, the bike would be a lot more interesting. They made a good start with the V-Rod, it is only 15 years out of date instead of 50.
________________________________________ ____________________
These are all the things that make a Harley what it is. Not everyone wants to break the sound barrier when they go for a ride. Riding a Harley is like driving a "Peterbuilt" or a "Kenworth" Riding a rice rocket is like driving a high priced European sports car.


Have a great Holiday! Zuti

In August of this year, one of our Corvette Club members was killed while riding his new Harley. He was in a group returning from a charity run.At the service there was not enough parking for a sea of Harley's and Corvettes. It was a sad day, but an awsome sight.
R.I.P. Jim Layland
On the other hand, I have no interest in or respect for crotch rockets or the typical punks that drive them.
Didn't mean to turn this into a rant, but I have never understood the attraction of a bike with an engine designed in the 1940s. 45 degree V-twin (think big vibration)? Single carburetor? 5500 RPM redline? External oil tank? Tiny restrictive mufflers (when you find someone civilized enough to be using mufflers)? Separate gearbox and engine?? Harley Davidson seems to make a virtue of obsolesence. If they took half the money that they put into styling and put it into updating the engine, the bike would be a lot more interesting. They made a good start with the V-Rod, it is only 15 years out of date instead of 50.
Handling: well it's not a race bike, and therefore doesn't handle like a race bike... BUT I've had no problem sticking with Porsche 911's in the twisties (actual roads, not a track)... Poor brakes??? WTH are you talking about??? I can stop mine on a dime (relatively speaking)... Obviously the rice burners can out brake me, but again, Harley's aren't race bikes -- though many DRAG bikes are Harley based...
Power: Stock - not bad... Ok so it doesn't do 0-60 in 3 seconds... But I GUARANTEE you I could throw you off the back of my bike with NO PROBLEM... Stock Harley's are about low end torque... Yes they're heavy -- but that's because they're not made of plastic!
Corvette:Harley - Love my Harley, love my Vette. Both are a BLAST to drive... Both ARE American Icons. Both come from the factory somewhat lacking (IMO), and both are a blast (and a money pit) to mod! Both have a cult following (owners and non-owners), both have devoted clubs (national and local); Harley owners LOOK meaner than Vette owners, but they're equally as nice; Harley has better merchandise than Corvettes (get on the ball GM!); both are fairly expensive toys (not talking Sportsters); both are fairly exclusive; - there are A LOT of similarities...
To expound on 6SPD98's analogy - driving a Harley is like driving a Vette (or a Viper)... Driving a crotch rocket is like driving a Ferrari or Lamborghini (though for a lot less $$).
Flame suit on,
Vaughn
Oh, and where is the Vette engine built? Salute to our Canadian brothers. If you are ever in the Midwest try to make it to Milwaukee for the engine plant tour. I think it's about an hour long but you get a real appreciation for the work and dedication that goes in to a Harley. Now I would like to go on the Bowling Green assembly tour.
















