C5 big change??
Would it be wise to sell this vette and get into a 1999 or 2000??
Is there that big of a change for the better????

If you want a C5 go for it. The car is sweet. Any problems on your C4? Or are you just looking to upgrade?
Also.....and dont quote me on this....if you can get 19K for that car.....take it and run!!!!!!!!!!!!!!





One afternoon, he took my car out for a short drive and within two days, traded in his '96 for a '98 pace car.
If you're not attached to your '96, can flip it and make $2500, I say go for it.




Easier to get in and out of, MUCH smoother ride, better handling, no comparison on the brakes - I had the HD brakes on the C4 and the C5 stock brakes would outstop them by FAR. The C5 is also more comfortable inside. Also, the thing I really loved was that on the C4 when you see it coming down the road at night, the headlights look like just any other car.... the C5's are so distinctive and wider apart than most cars
Best of luck
Dan
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Brakes are definately the first thing you notice, then all the extra room-almost too much!! If you get a coupe, the top comes off so much easier. I went from a C4 with auto and 2.59 gears to a C5 with MN6 and 3.43, big difference!!!!! Speaker placement in the C5 is great with plenty of room for modifying, the C4 left little to play with on the audio end. And I still see C5s on the road and think to myself "Wow, that's a sweet car!" -even when I'm in mine....I love all Corvettes but the C5 was love at first sight to me.
The C-4 had better bottom (low rpm) torque.
The C-4 "bumped" steers more on corners with bumps.
The C-4 had better seats that were more comfortable and they did not "rock" like the C-5s.
The C-5 gets slightly better gas mileage. Both cars were Mn6
The C-4 was harder to climb in and out of (due to higher rocker panels)
The C-5 is faster.
Instrument panel on C-5 is much better.
The C-4 had better front end turn in due to larger tire footprint.
The C-4 had a mechanical reverse lock-out which is WAY better than the lousy C-5 unit.
C-5 rides smoother.
C-5 is easier to work on.
C-5 has a much better interior.
C-5 has a better sound system.
No cool HUD on C-4.
C-4 had a better "feedback" on clutch engagement.
C-4 had really bad grounding for electrical.
The lists goes on and on..... But, I do like the C-5 more.



Would it be wise to sell this vette and get into a 1999 or 2000??
Is there that big of a change for the better????




The C-4 had better bottom (low rpm) torque.
The C-4 "bumped" steers more on corners with bumps.
The C-4 had better seats that were more comfortable and they did not "rock" like the C-5s.
The C-5 gets slightly better gas mileage. Both cars were Mn6
The C-4 was harder to climb in and out of (due to higher rocker panels)
The C-5 is faster.
Instrument panel on C-5 is much better.
The C-4 had better front end turn in due to larger tire footprint.
The C-4 had a mechanical reverse lock-out which is WAY better than the lousy C-5 unit.
C-5 rides smoother.
C-5 is easier to work on.
C-5 has a much better interior.
C-5 has a better sound system.
No cool HUD on C-4.
C-4 had a better "feedback" on clutch engagement.
C-4 had really bad grounding for electrical.
The lists goes on and on..... But, I do like the C-5 more.

Everything above is true!
I have a 96 automatic coupe and a 2000 m6 coupe.
The C5 is indeed easier to get in and out of.
I can fit two full size acoustic guitar cases flush on the floor of the C5's hatch/trunk and still have tons of room for bags and suitcases.. The 96 C4 will fit a single guitar and then a few bags and a suitcase.
I had to drive one before I decided I wanted to move into the 21st century with my Vette. The raw power of the C4 is not missed in the M6 of the C5. Everything is indeed more refined in the 2000 but I can still pin myself back in the seat with ease.
Good Luck
Rain
The C-4 had better bottom (low rpm) torque.
The C-4 "bumped" steers more on corners with bumps.
The C-4 had better seats that were more comfortable and they did not "rock" like the C-5s.
The C-5 gets slightly better gas mileage. Both cars were Mn6
The C-4 was harder to climb in and out of (due to higher rocker panels)
The C-5 is faster.
Instrument panel on C-5 is much better.
The C-4 had better front end turn in due to larger tire footprint.
The C-4 had a mechanical reverse lock-out which is WAY better than the lousy C-5 unit.
C-5 rides smoother.
C-5 is easier to work on.
C-5 has a much better interior.
C-5 has a better sound system.
No cool HUD on C-4.
C-4 had a better "feedback" on clutch engagement.
C-4 had really bad grounding for electrical.
The lists goes on and on..... But, I do like the C-5 more.

Dope
The C-4 had better bottom (low rpm) torque.
...................
C-4 had a better "feedback" on clutch engagement.
C-4 had really bad grounding for electrical.
The lists goes on and on..... But, I do like the C-5 more.

- clamshell hood/front end (being able to lift the whole thing to work under the hood, i really liked that).
- the higher quality seats/leather on the C4 (the C4's seats were far superior).
- the pull out cover, on the coupe, to cover items placed in the back that you want hidden from view (although i think there is an optional GM cover that i could buy & install)
Last edited by 66427-450; Dec 27, 2004 at 10:24 AM.














