When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
What is the downside (if any) to removing the cats. I have long tube headers and I'm going to install a GHL or B&B cat back. Will there be any power gain if I just eliminate the cats and add an X pipe?
Interesting point, what states have emission laws? All I know is CA and AZ. We don't have any vehicle inspection of any type in Arkansas, so you can run anything anywhere. When I lived in AZ an emission test always cost me several hundred to reinstall all of the required crap, retune the engine to pass, then take it all back off and retune it to run good, but that was better than driving a POS so that some tree hugger could get his rocks off.
The reason I ask is because I have seen a lot of posts saying that the gains are negligible. However, I used to own a 454SS pickup and when I removed the catalytic converter the thing came alive. I thought maybe the old converter was just blocked, but, when I installed a brand new converter (stock) the thing bogged down again. It was really noticeable.
You will also have a gas odor in the cabin when you are stopped and idling. I have read many posts from people saying they regretted eliminating the cats.
Good thread. Interesting observations. I didn't think you would get any smell unless you were burning rich With a catylic converter. With no cats it should be like in the old days of smelling gas out the exhaust. Any ideas?
I'mrunning lt's and no cats. The thing is a little stinky at startup but once at running temp. it's fine. Only when my top is down, at a stoplight, in a light, wavering tailwind, can I smell a little exhaust. It's all in the tune imo.
Louder and more agressive with X-pipe and B& B Bullets...
...or take them off...onluy gets louder...
I think there is more power and dyno supports that...
... Ill be listening for you decision...
All in all, it sounds like high flow cats would be the best compromise. No legal problems or potential odors and the performance should be close to a gutted cat or no cats at all........I'm still convinced though that no cats = more power.
I'm running off roads pipes and I run a tad rich because of the cam. I picked up 5hp when we removed them. Yeah there was alittle power in crease on the dyno but nothing that I can feel on the street
In modern NA cars, from what I understand anyway, a good hi-flow cat with properly sized exhaust is damn near as power efficient as no cats at all. In the turbo world, it's a totally different ballgame, but that is what I've read/been told about NA applications.
St. Jude Donor '05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14
It is against Federal law to remove or replace your cats if your car is less than 10 years old. If they are replaced, they must be replaced by the manufacturer and must have been defective.
All that being said - as soon as I install my LGs, I'm going with Random Tech hi flow cats
It is against Federal law to remove or replace your cats if your car is less than 10 years old. If they are replaced, they must be replaced by the manufacturer and must have been defective.
All that being said - as soon as I install my LGs, I'm going with Random Tech hi flow cats
I'll go quietly, officer
EG
The Federal Law states that you can not totally remove your cats legally at any time, but you cannot replace them unless defective sooner than 50,000 miles or five years. And I could not find anything in the verbage about having to be replaced by the manufacturer. Any muffler shop in CA can replace the cats, if they are proven to be defective.
Here in NC, if your car is 1967 or newer (no, that is not a typo) it better have every emmissions piece on it that it came with from the factory or it will not get the required money generating inspection sticker put on it that is required for it to be on the road. Get caught without it and it is a quick $250.