When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
We have always used a standard process to retune the MAF to calibrate the MAF to your combo. All of the tunes I have looked at have had some very different maf curves than what we usually see once we recalibrate them. What is everyone else doing?
Phil
First I disable the MAF and dial in the VE. Once that is good I re-enable the MAF and log the LTFT. If it is pretty consistent I scale the whole table up or down. Then I used to log MAF freq and LTFT and plug everything into a 4th order polynomial in Excel. Very time consuming. Recently I came across some HPT histograms for MAF % error VS LTFT or STFT and I believe there was one for commanded AFR error as well. It's a single row with the MAF frequencies as columns and the value in each column is the respective average % up or down the LTFT or STFT is in that frequency range. So you just drive around, the more the better, and cut and paste the values as multiply by % into the MAF airflow VS frequency table. Rinse lather repeat.
Last edited by 5 Liter Eater; Jul 25, 2006 at 05:32 PM.
Heres the thread with the HPT Scanner config and LTFT and STFT histograms. Looks like I lied about a commanded AFR one though. Shouldn't be too hard to tweak the histogram to be % AFR Error rather than LTFT or STFT though for use with a wideband. I have to admit my ignorance of the histogram configuration. I just borrowed these from soundengineer. this thread did open my eyes a little though.
Here's what I do....
Dual widebands plumbed back into laptop
Averaged both WBs and input the averaged Air Fuel Error
Logged into histogram for MAF frequency
Do a nice 20 minute drive filling the VE table with mininum of 20 hits per cell
Input the new MAF table and reenable the O2s. Whats funny is usually the stock O2s are off all over the place pretty consistent. My MAF tables have a similar curve but are very different than a stock one. Dialing in the VE and MAF table should only be done with a wideband O2, your accuracy is only as good as the sensor your using.
Phil
Hmmm, Well I don't tune with a wideband (yet) so I can't speak to the differences between the NB and WB sensors. Figuring you trust your WBs more I know I have seen a thread about recalibrating the NB O2's to account for headers, different distance from exhaust ports, etc on the HPT forums. Without that, calibrating the MAF to the WB doesn't do a whole lot of good if the NB sensors are foing to throw off the fuel trims, especially to the positive side.
Honestly I'm surprised to see you still messing with the MAF Phil. I would have thought you'd be an SD guy through and through by now.
I definitely favor the mafless tunes but many of my customers still want to keep the MAF. Your right about tuning the MAF with the wideband and the stock O2s altering the results, I'd much rather have a MAF tuned with a wideband, The fuel trims may pull it 4-5% @ part throttle but its going to be dialed in @ WOT where it counts. The best way to do it is to use dual widebands simulated back into the computer.
I thought that we used to log Dyn Cyl Air and MAF Hz and use it to form a new MAF curve. This is what I did for my car and it came out pretty well. I gathered all of the data while SD tuning, then used Excel to fit a curve. Then used that curve to get the numbers for the MAF table.
I thought that we used to log Dyn Cyl Air and MAF Hz and use it to form a new MAF curve. This is what I did for my car and it came out pretty well. I gathered all of the data while SD tuning, then used Excel to fit a curve. Then used that curve to get the numbers for the MAF table.
VE only first, including WOT pulls on the dyno to even dial in the high load stuff to desired PE settings. Enable MAF in open loop still, log error % from AFR on wideband just like VE, including wot pulls. Enable the rest of the closed loop system and you will find its pretty dead on. Check all your work again on the road when you are happy. Works pretty good.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.