C5 Tech Corvette Tech/Performance: LS1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Anyone Using DynoSim to Simulate Engine Upgrades?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 6, 2005 | 12:14 PM
  #1  
Mark VerMurlen's Avatar
Mark VerMurlen
Thread Starter
Drifting
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 5
From: Bothell WA
Default Anyone Using DynoSim to Simulate Engine Upgrades?

I bought a copy of Pro Racing Sim's DynoSim Advanced software and have been playing with it to simulate the LS1 engine. I'm thinking of doing a heads and cam package on my car, so I thought this software could help me decide what size cam to get. So far it looks pretty good. I've been able to replicate the torque and power curves of the stock LS1 pretty closely. I've also been able to fairly closely replicate the current set of mods on my car with LT headers.

So now I'm working on modeling heads from GMPP and AFR based on flow numbers that I've found on the web. I've also modeled several cam shafts again based on info on the web or at Comp Cams web site. Its interesting to note that as the cams get over 220/220, they start decreasing the torque in the range below 3000 rpms. They also generate big HP numbers that move higher and higher in the rpm band the bigger the cam gets. I suppose that's not news to many of you, but it really is interesting to see with graphical overlays.

As of right now, I'm thinking of getting a set of AFR 205 heads with a custom ground Comp Cams cam shaft that's 212/218 .552/.563 112 LSA using XE lobes. It doesn't lose any torque across the rpm band and it generates +85 HP up around 6000 rpm with the heads. I'll continue to play with different cams in this software and see what I like.

Has anybody else used this software? If so, do you have any experiences to share? I'm not sure how far to trust what this software is telling me.

- Mark
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2005 | 01:16 PM
  #2  
leaftye's Avatar
leaftye
Safety Car
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,979
Likes: 5
From: San Diego, CA "leaf" "tee" "e"
Default

Does it allow you to enter component weights? If it does, I'd like to play around with it to see what lighter parts does to move the redline.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2005 | 01:33 PM
  #3  
Mark VerMurlen's Avatar
Mark VerMurlen
Thread Starter
Drifting
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 5
From: Bothell WA
Default

Originally Posted by leaftye
Does it allow you to enter component weights? If it does, I'd like to play around with it to see what lighter parts does to move the redline.
Nope it doesn't take component weights into account. It's primarily based on pressure, airflow, and friction models. I bought a book that explains how it works which is also very interesting in teaching about engine theory.

I've not heard of component weights making much difference in power output, aside from the fact that lower weight means you could possibly spin the engine higher. This software doesn't calculate what a "safe" redline would be. It will show torque and power much higher than you could possibly spin the engine safely.

- Mark

Last edited by Mark VerMurlen; Feb 6, 2005 at 01:43 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2005 | 01:40 PM
  #4  
thetorch's Avatar
thetorch
Burning Brakes
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 1
From: Arlington Texas
Default

I have this and Engine Analyzer Pro v3.3 from Performance Trends. One thing to be very careful about with these engine simulation programs is that you can't use them to determine an absolute HP increase/decrease with specific parts. It should be used to see 'trends' associated with different parts. One of the most difficult aspects of these software packages are the data points needed for each part that you want to test. Each part has a different set of data points required to accurately simulate it and many times you have to physically test/measure the actual part to get these data points. Guessing on these data points can really skew the output.

Simulating heads and cams is the most difficult. Heads have a few aspects that really make a difference, i.e. swirl, port length, port volume, material, etc. The aspects of cams are lobe profile and timing.

My personal preference is Engine Analyzer, but Dyno Sim has some neat features.

Leftye neither will simulate mass. Engine analyzer does a good job of simulating friction characteristics associated with piston and bearing surface sizes. Performance Trends has a program called 'Rotating Intertia Calculator' that will simulate the weight of parts for the engine and chassis. It doesn't give absolute horsepower outputs like Engine Analyzer, but it shows the impact of a part to the weight of the car. I've found it to be very enlightening.

Good luck!
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2005 | 05:27 PM
  #5  
Mark VerMurlen's Avatar
Mark VerMurlen
Thread Starter
Drifting
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 5
From: Bothell WA
Default

Originally Posted by thetorch
... One thing to be very careful about with these engine simulation programs is that you can't use them to determine an absolute HP increase/decrease with specific parts. It should be used to see 'trends' associated with different parts. One of the most difficult aspects of these software packages are the data points needed for each part that you want to test. Each part has a different set of data points required to accurately simulate it and many times you have to physically test/measure the actual part to get these data points. Guessing on these data points can really skew the output.

Simulating heads and cams is the most difficult. Heads have a few aspects that really make a difference, i.e. swirl, port length, port volume, material, etc. The aspects of cams are lobe profile and timing.

My personal preference is Engine Analyzer, but Dyno Sim has some neat features.

...
I was worried about that. I think I'll have to try to cross reference real dyno graphs from other people's cars with this software. I still think I'm going to stay on the "small" side of the cams out there. Thanks!

- Mark
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2005 | 06:55 PM
  #6  
runamuk's Avatar
runamuk
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,370
Likes: 8
From: Slave to the evil empire
Cruise-In V Veteran
St. Jude Donor '04
Default

I bought it when it first came out, I was shopping for a cam to compliment my Magnacharger. When I entered in everything that I had at the time, it gave me a dyno number that was pretty darn close to what my car was actually making. Then I started adding different cams and heads and found that the numbers were pretty well maxed out as far as the program was concerned, so at that point I lost confidence in the software and sold it to another forum member.

BTW - according to the dyno-sim software a 5.7 litre engine with a Mag supercharger maxed out right around 430 hp
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2005 | 09:10 PM
  #7  
thetorch's Avatar
thetorch
Burning Brakes
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 1
From: Arlington Texas
Default

Originally Posted by runamuk
I bought it when it first came out, I was shopping for a cam to compliment my Magnacharger. When I entered in everything that I had at the time, it gave me a dyno number that was pretty darn close to what my car was actually making. Then I started adding different cams and heads and found that the numbers were pretty well maxed out as far as the program was concerned, so at that point I lost confidence in the software and sold it to another forum member.

BTW - according to the dyno-sim software a 5.7 litre engine with a Mag supercharger maxed out right around 430 hp

This is the issue that I talked about earlier. When you start adding heads with different port work, cams with different lobe profiles, superchargers, turbos, and intakes with different runner lengths and volumes and plenum specs, the software becomes very complex to work with. You need a lot data that is difficult to obtain to correctly model these engines. Garbage in = garbage out.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Anyone Using DynoSim to Simulate Engine Upgrades?





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:18 PM.

story-0
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-2
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE