Difference between camaro LS1 and vette LS1


F-Body engine parts are about 10 timess LESS than Vette parts.
Will internals work?
EG
F-Body engine parts are about 10 timess LESS than Vette parts.
Will internals work?
EG

Guts are the same! Exhaust manifolds, oil pan, lack of EGR, and throttle bodies. Thats about it.
Last edited by Mike94ZLT1; Jun 9, 2005 at 01:38 AM.
F-Body engine parts are about 10 timess LESS than Vette parts.
Will internals work?
EG

As far as internals everything is the same. (TB and manifold arent)
Infact, I think if GM HAD advertised F-body at 345 HP, they might still be in business. And those numbers would look better on the charts and for advertising for the F-body, when compared against the Mustangs, which are still very much in business (unlike F-bodies).
Its confusing for me, why LS1 in Vette and F-body are not rated the same. I understand the weight difference in cars and design, etc. But the engine ratings should've been the same.
Last edited by Vette_Fan; Jun 9, 2005 at 05:30 AM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Corvette Tax can kiss my a$$

You can tell if Camaro's had the SLP option by the exhaust: Regular exhaust had one pipe on each side, SLP had two pipes on each side.
Last edited by 123Gone; Jun 9, 2005 at 11:09 AM.
Infact, I think if GM HAD advertised F-body at 345 HP, they might still be in business. And those numbers would look better on the charts and for advertising for the F-body, when compared against the Mustangs, which are still very much in business (unlike F-bodies).
Its confusing for me, why LS1 in Vette and F-body are not rated the same. I understand the weight difference in cars and design, etc. But the engine ratings should've been the same.

GM plays those games all the time. The L19 454 I bought out of a 99 suburban was rated at 295HP. If you look at the rated torque number at the peak HP and work the math, its really 305HP. But when the engine was released in 96, the Corvette had a 300HP engine, and you can't be having a truck with more HP than the 'vette right?


Why do you think Z28s and such have the same dyno #s.
I have owned plenty of Camaros and they were well under rated.
The engine comes from the same factory. Just a few outer parts are different.
Look up the part #s if you think they are the same.
The Cams and rods and pistons are all the same part #s.
I used to love while at the track the Z28 would click off 13.4 quarters and the Vette owners would say "oh got some mods?"
I love my vette, but I paid 19k for my 99' Z28 1LE brand spanking new and 7 miles on her.
But a Vette is a Vette and a Camaro is a Camaro
Why would I pay as much as 5-10 times as much for something I can buy from Summit Racing at a tithe of the cost???
I'm off to Jegs and Summit Racing. I'll keep you folks updated on what works in my 01 Coupe!
EG




name for the Camaro buyers and SLP started doing the conversion work for them too. I've kind of lost track of what ever became of that arraingment over the last few years of the F-Bodys' life, but it seems as if GM did the same thing to SLP that Ford did to Carroll Shelby and that was to bring everything back "in house" so-to-speak and tell Carroll "buh-bye"
BTW, this was the main reason that SLP was offering many of the wheels, tires, etc for sale to the public through their own company. These were all brand new "take-off" parts that they would wind up with after the conversions. HTH
Infact, I think if GM HAD advertised F-body at 345 HP, they might still be in business. And those numbers would look better on the charts and for advertising for the F-body, when compared against the Mustangs, which are still very much in business (unlike F-bodies).
Its confusing for me, why LS1 in Vette and F-body are not rated the same. I understand the weight difference in cars and design, etc. But the engine ratings should've been the same.




















