Feedback wanted: Driveablilty difference between 112lsa and 114lsa
Thread Starter
Coolest Guy Evar!
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 3
From: Fairfax VA
Feedback wanted: Driveablilty difference between 112lsa and 114lsa
Just like the title says, I would like feedback from owners on the driveability difference between a 112lsa cam and a 114lsa.
Thanks
Thanks
Team Owner
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 174,312
Likes: 1,217
From: Here
Pilot of Beer Force 1
Tampa Regional Coordinator
CI 4-5-6-7-8 Veteran
Organizer St. Jude Fundraiser
I believe in the Beer Fairy
Can't speak for the 112 but my 114 has a nice slight lope and 0 driveability issues...we did kick the idle up a bit on both normal and A/C settings but thats it
Drifting
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 0
From: NE PA
All else being equal, the 112 LSA cam will be a little choppier at idle, but you'll get more power under the curve and better VE with it vs. the 114. I have a 223/227 112 cam in my A4 car with the idle set at 825 rpm and it idles just fine within 1-2 minutes after startup. Just driving around it's really no different than stock. 
Thread Starter
Coolest Guy Evar!
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 3
From: Fairfax VA
Originally Posted by XTrooper
All else being equal, the 112 LSA cam will be a little choppier at idle, but you'll get more power under the curve and better VE with it vs. the 114. I have a 223/227 112 cam in my A4 car with the idle set at 825 rpm and it idles just fine within 1-2 minutes after startup. Just driving around it's really no different than stock.
Thanks, I decided to go with the 112 lsa version of the cam for exactly that reason.
