C5 Tech Corvette Tech/Performance: LS1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Torque Converter: Vigilante or ProTorque ??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 09:39 PM
  #1  
Dirty Howie's Avatar
Dirty Howie
Thread Starter
Team Owner
20 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
Photogenic
Liked
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 26,345
Likes: 232
From: SoCal
Default Torque Converter: Vigilante or ProTorque ??

I need to make a very quick decision.

I want a mild TC for a daily driver. It will see many road race days and a couple of days at the strip each year. I have 3.42 gears and 412 RWHP

It needs to be high quality and dependable. Needs lock up ability.

Looking at 2400 to 2800 max. Want best torque multiplication possible.

Which of these companies do you recommend?
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 09:48 PM
  #2  
Antvette's Avatar
Antvette
Drifting
15 Year Member
Veteran: Marine Corps
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 3
From: Round Hill, VA
Default

Well, given the choices...Vigilante...but I prefer Yank.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2005 | 04:28 AM
  #3  
WALLstAL's Avatar
WALLstAL
Race Director
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 15,466
Likes: 0
From: GARDENA Ca, State Of Konfusion
St. Jude Donor '05
Default

I had a PT-2400 (Pro Torque), but I prefer the Yank! Great for drag racing, but for road courses I have no idea what to go with, good luck.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2005 | 06:57 AM
  #4  
navy99vert's Avatar
navy99vert
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,622
Likes: 0
From: Savannah Georgia
Cruise-In VIII Veteran
Default

Vigilante 2800
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2005 | 08:24 AM
  #5  
C5XTASY's Avatar
C5XTASY
Safety Car
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 10
From: Monticello MN
Default

Originally Posted by WALLstAL
I had a PT-2400 (Pro Torque), but I prefer the Yank! Great for drag racing, but for road courses I have no idea what to go with, good luck.
Al, why do you prefer the Yank over the Protorque? Is it because of the higher stalls available for the C5, or some other performance, reliability or heat generation factor? Thanks.
Ed
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2005 | 10:44 AM
  #6  
glind46677's Avatar
glind46677
Racer
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 357
Likes: 1
From: Lenoir Tn
Default

Go with the best Go with Yank SS3200-
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2005 | 10:54 AM
  #7  
robsvette's Avatar
robsvette
Safety Car
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 3,950
Likes: 32
From: belleville n.j.
Default

i have a vig 4000 2.25 str and the driveablility is more than fine. i dont understand why everyone is so scared to go to a real TC. a 2400 TC to me seems like a total waste of money. take it from me. i already had a yank 3000 and wasted my money with it. only issue is heat but add a tranny cooler and your fine
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2005 | 11:14 AM
  #8  
Laguna Blu's Avatar
Laguna Blu
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Conversation Starter
Liked
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,155
Likes: 154
From: The Arid Sunny Desert
Default

PT 2400 here with no problems and excellent driveability going on 4 years now. Other than a quick 1-2 shift during street driving, this unit behaves like stock on my 405 RWHP vert. Also no delay from the time you put your foot on the gas until the car moves, feels really natural.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2005 | 02:19 PM
  #9  
WALLstAL's Avatar
WALLstAL
Race Director
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 15,466
Likes: 0
From: GARDENA Ca, State Of Konfusion
St. Jude Donor '05
Default

Originally Posted by C5XTASY
Al, why do you prefer the Yank over the Protorque? Is it because of the higher stalls available for the C5, or some other performance, reliability or heat generation factor? Thanks.
Ed
Higher stall, good reliability with excellent driving manners. I was first reluctant to go with such a high stall, now I wish the SS-3800 would have been available back in the day.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2005 | 02:42 PM
  #10  
LS1LT1's Avatar
LS1LT1
Team Owner
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 27,254
Likes: 136
From: Short Hills, NJ
Default

I've had both, I like the Vigilante more.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2005 | 02:48 PM
  #11  
C5XTASY's Avatar
C5XTASY
Safety Car
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 10
From: Monticello MN
Default

Originally Posted by WALLstAL
Higher stall, good reliability with excellent driving manners. I was first reluctant to go with such a high stall, now I wish the SS-3800 would have been available back in the day.

Thanks, Al. I'm trying to decide on gears and converter for, hopefully, a winter install. I don't strip race the car and was thinking 3.42s and a Protorque 2400, myself. I drove a car with similar power to mine (376 rwhp, 375 rwtorque, SAE corrected and smoothed), with that setup, and it sure felt good to me.
Ed
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2005 | 02:55 PM
  #12  
Dirty Howie's Avatar
Dirty Howie
Thread Starter
Team Owner
20 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
Photogenic
Liked
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 26,345
Likes: 232
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by LS1LT1
I've had both, I like the Vigilante more.
What was it that you liked better??

Were they the same stall on the same car??

Protorque has one that they claim is specifically made for the C5


DH
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2005 | 07:24 PM
  #13  
ToplessTexan's Avatar
ToplessTexan
Safety Car
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,154
Likes: 1
From: Murphy TX
Cruise-In II Veteran
Default

Originally Posted by robsvette
i have a vig 4000 2.25 str and the driveablility is more than fine. i dont understand why everyone is so scared to go to a real TC.
Not every application is the same and a big Vig doesn't make sense in probably most applications. (I wouldn't set my car up the way it is to achieve DH's goals for example.) Also a lot of folks have no idea what they're buying, rely solely on what they hear in places like this and from their buddies, and would like to err on the conservative side which is not a bad plan when that's the case. (I don't mean that in a mean way, nor that it applies in this particular case.) But your point that it's easy to understall is taken.

Last edited by ToplessTexan; Aug 29, 2005 at 07:27 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2005 | 07:26 PM
  #14  
b98's Avatar
b98
Le Mans Master
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,202
Likes: 3
From: somwhere Texas
Default

Originally Posted by navy99vert
Vigilante 2800
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2005 | 08:08 PM
  #15  
Dirty Howie's Avatar
Dirty Howie
Thread Starter
Team Owner
20 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
Photogenic
Liked
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 26,345
Likes: 232
From: SoCal
Default

I am freaking out........

I ordered the Pt2400 today thru my tuner A&A.

Then he told me he thought the PT2400 felt much looser than a Vig2400 he recently had in his shop.

Both had 3.42 and FLP

I have to call him first thing in the am and he will see if he can get the Vig2400 shipped by friday.

ProTorque says that theirs is the tightist feeling converter.
Its going to cost me twice as much in shipping to get the Vigilante

Damn converters...........
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2005 | 08:35 PM
  #16  
'06 Quicksilver Z06's Avatar
'06 Quicksilver Z06
Team Owner
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 38,314
Likes: 35
Default

I had a ProTorque 2400 in my C5 and I have nothing but good things to say about it. Also Bigmac on this forum recently had the ProTorque 2400 installed.

In normal driving it behaves very similar to stock. No noticable looseness at all. But when you kick it it performs very well.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2005 | 09:34 PM
  #17  
Laguna Blu's Avatar
Laguna Blu
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Conversation Starter
Liked
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,155
Likes: 154
From: The Arid Sunny Desert
Default

Originally Posted by EB20003
I had a ProTorque 2400 in my C5 and I have nothing but good things to say about it. Also Bigmac on this forum recently had the ProTorque 2400 installed.

In normal driving it behaves very similar to stock. No noticable looseness at all. But when you kick it it performs very well.
I must reiterate NO LOOSENESS AT ALL in the PT 2400
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Torque Converter: Vigilante or ProTorque ??

Old Aug 29, 2005 | 09:55 PM
  #18  
Dirty Howie's Avatar
Dirty Howie
Thread Starter
Team Owner
20 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
Photogenic
Liked
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 26,345
Likes: 232
From: SoCal
Default

You guys think maybe Andy at A&A is getting a little LOOSE in his old age??

I think I am going to go drive his with PT2400/3.42/FLP level5 in the morning and see for my self. It also has a super charger though... as does everything he owns!!!

BIGMAC, EB2003, Pewtavert:

Thanks for the good reports on the PT2400
I talked to them this morning and they were very nice and helpful. He claims their converter is very tight and cool....not requiring a cooler (I already have one anyways)

Wish you guys could give me your experinces with the TC in serious canyon carving or road racing.


DH
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2005 | 09:57 PM
  #19  
Cary's Avatar
Cary
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,814
Likes: 1
From: FT Lewis WA
Default

Originally Posted by navy99vert
Vigilante 2800
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2005 | 10:05 AM
  #20  
Mr. Lucky's Avatar
Mr. Lucky
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,439
Likes: 6
From: Newark, DE
St. Jude Donor '06
Default

Originally Posted by Dirty Howie
You guys think maybe Andy at A&A is getting a little LOOSE in his old age??

I think I am going to go drive his with PT2400/3.42/FLP level5 in the morning and see for my self. It also has a super charger though... as does everything he owns!!!
No comment on the first part... but, that vert of his has a TCI 2800 converter.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:30 PM.