When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Over the years I've seen a 13-15% loss used on the MN6/M12 while 15-18% is applied to the A4. So, for a 305 rwhp MN6 C5 with a 13% loss applied:
305/.87 = 350.57 fwhp
I've been told 15% for an M6 and 18-20% for an A4 from some pretty reputable tuners. Don't know how accurate that is, though. I would think, for example, that a 2.73 rear would dyno higher than a 3.15. Logic would say that the A4 has more drivetrain loss than an M6, but exactly how much, seems open to some conjecture. In the final analysis, it probably doesn't really mean much, except for bragging rights. It's in, as they say, where the rubber hits the road.
Ed
I've been told 15% for an M6 and 18-20% for an A4 from some pretty reputable tuners. Don't know how accurate that is, though. I would think, for example, that a 2.73 rear would dyno higher than a 3.15. Logic would say that the A4 has more drivetrain loss than an M6, but exactly how much, seems open to some conjecture. In the final analysis, it probably doesn't really mean much, except for bragging rights. It's in, as they say, where the rubber hits the road.
Ed
the correct number is 17%. thats from my dyno/tuner guy
I wish that were the case, at least for an M6 because I would have 540 crank hp, not likely. I believe from the advertised crank hp that GM publishes for the LS1 and LS6 and the numbers that show up for these engines in stock M6 vettes are ~305rwhp for LS1's and ~350rwhp for LS6's. You can extrapolate that to ~13% loss in the drivetrain and about 15% for an A4 for a DynoJet dyno. This is with all stock components including drivetrain. On a Mustange Dyno you would typically see 3% to 5% additional loss. Is it possible your dyno tuner was quoteing Mustange Dyno losses? Also as rear differential ratios change so does the measured output. As the ratio increases the measured output decreases.
I am told that on an A4, 3.42 gears and a 2600 stall converter will increase the driveline loss to 18-20% vs. 13-15% with stock 2.73 gears and 1400 stall. Can anyone confirm?
I am told that on an A4, 3.42 gears and a 2600 stall converter will increase the driveline loss to 18-20% vs. 13-15% with stock 2.73 gears and 1400 stall. Can anyone confirm?
I can only confirm that your car will be MUCH FASTER
I usually tend to stay out of these hottly contested debates, but I will say this: You are all pretty much in the ball park, and are fairly well informed. Typically we see in manual trans, vehicles approx 10-15% loss and 15-25% loss in automatics.
You can get really close, but for those of us who are sticklers- next time your engine is out, have it "easy" dyno'ed and then when installed, take your car to a chassis dyno and you'll know exact loss.
The last thing I will say between the Mustang Dyno and Dynojet( "Mine's Better Than Your's" ) argument that will go on till eternity- we use a Dynojet, but- have had the same vette on a MDyno, with an extremely qualifed operator and have acheived results to within 1hp.