Question: Does a velocity stacK really work?
Looking for feed back from those who have/are using it.
Any different dyno #'s after install...
Thanks,
Mike
Excellent results!
Remember the old Q jet carbs, they had gobs of bottom end because the used tiny primary throttle plates, then when the secondary's opened the engine could breath.
Oops you have no secondary's to open.
So what you do is increase the livelyness at low rpm and lose top end, not what your lookig for. I don't think!
Looking for feed back from those who have/are using it.
Any different dyno #'s after install...
Thanks,
Mike
Dave
PS trying to clean up my storage area and I have sooo much extra stuff laying around
Looking for feed back from those who have/are using it.
Any different dyno #'s after install...
Thanks,
Mike
Additionally, in carburated engines, the increased velocity entering the carburator increased the flow of air through the carb and it's venturi, thus increasing air/fuel flow for a given throttle plate angle, and better atomization of the fuel.
This effect also helped mechanical fuel injection such as the old hilborn fuel injection systems. The air was contained within the tall stacks as it was accelerated, and this provided the same benifits as the carbed engines.
Todays port injected engines would not benefit from this because the fuel is atomized as it departs the fuel injector located at the intake port, and the internal runner passageways of the intake are optomized for airflow acceleration enroute to each cylinder head port.
Hope this helped.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Excellent results!
What excellent results did you see with the addition of the TB
John Sr.
What excellent results did you see with the addition of the TB
John Sr.
Excellent results!
Dave
PS trying to clean up my storage area and I have sooo much extra stuff laying around

Last edited by FRCBobby; Dec 3, 2005 at 05:34 PM.


















