160* or 180* therm?

Pretty good advice from a relative newbie here,,,,the C5 was designed to run between 190 and200 coolant, and 200 210 oil temps... running slightly hotter is OK but running colder is a no no.. you do not want to run your car below 190F for long periods of time..
If you go with a 160 in MN, you will have to change it out for the winter...
Stock fan setting were designed to work in the 230F coolant environment. Take note of the red line on the gage for coolant temp.
Will running it cooler for more power hurt it in the long run (100,00 miles or so)? Maybe, but....
I DON'T CARE. I'll rebuild it or sell it before then.
Everything is a compromise. Ya pays ya money and ya takes ya choices.
How long do you plan to run this motor?
Pretty good advice from a relative newbie here,,,,the C5 was designed to run between 190 and200 coolant, and 200 210 oil temps... running slightly hotter is OK but running colder is a no no.. you do not want to run your car below 190F for long periods of time..
If you go with a 160 in MN, you will have to change it out for the winter...
Stock fan setting were designed to work in the 230F coolant environment. Take note of the red line on the gage for coolant temp.
DH
What can be said is that lower engine temps usually cause more friction.
And how much HP gain are you thinking? Anything under 10 I think would be in the noise from one dyno run to the next.
No flaming, but I just don't get it.
Have a good one,
Mike
I think the claimed HP gains may be related to the lower temp stat reducing ping, but I don't know for sure.
Some rightly say the LS1 was designed to run at higher temps than 180. They are right, but the reason to do that is not for optimum power but for lower emissions. NOx emissions are less when you are running hotter. Maybe after running 100,000 miles at lower temps you could have a problem passing emissions, but I never came close in all the times I have run the sniffer test.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Thanks to all for advice/tips
Matt
Stick a thermometer in the radiator fins on both sides of the fan, it will also tell you the efficiency.
As a rule of
High temps high speed (highway)=
Low or restricted water flow in some form... slipping water pump belt, hose collapsed, stuck thermostat, plugged radiator internal (low flow), plugged external with grass, rocks, plastic bags etc. Possible head gasket.
High temps while slow city driving =
Low air flow......fans are crap , radiator externally plugged up with garbage, thermostat, water pump corroded fins not flowing enough at idle.
A knowledgeable tech should be able to figure it out.
E.T.'s advice is spot-on, first thing I'd replace would be the radiator cap. I had a similar problem, replaced the cap, and no more coolant loss.
Get the system full of coolant and I bet you find your temps dropping right back down to normal.
HTH, and have a good one,
Mike

Hey there fellas....
I've been following alot of threads about what stat to use... Hands down, If you have a LS1/LS2 with no special cooling requirements...The 160 STAT WORKS BEST....Let's face it...Our fuel octane sucks....To get the most out of the motor....and not burns stuff up....Cooler is better..There's too much to get into here, but trust me...I've installed and sold 1000 of these 160's....Other states, climates, and countries...Hot or Cold...It dosen't matter.....The 160 works best and is guaranteed to make good heat in the winter in any climate and is your best friend in the summer. Ping and detonation is BAD...and our octane sucks.....That 160 is your friend. I have come across very few vehicles that didn't like it.....and they had aftermarket radiators...huge displacment engines...or other out of the ordinary circumstances....
Hope this helps,
Chuck CoW
Pretty good advice from a relative newbie here,,,,the C5 was designed to run between 190 and200 coolant, and 200 210 oil temps... running slightly hotter is OK but running colder is a no no.. you do not want to run your car below 190F for long periods of time..
If you go with a 160 in MN, you will have to change it out for the winter...
Stock fan setting were designed to work in the 230F coolant environment. Take note of the red line on the gage for coolant temp.
The late John Lingenfelter always put them in his cars.........Good enough for me!!
Last edited by Too-Tall; Apr 16, 2006 at 02:36 AM.
Pretty good advice from a relative newbie here,,,,the C5 was designed to run between 190 and200 coolant, and 200 210 oil temps... running slightly hotter is OK but running colder is a no no.. you do not want to run your car below 190F for long periods of time..
If you go with a 160 in MN, you will have to change it out for the winter...
Stock fan setting were designed to work in the 230F coolant environment. Take note of the red line on the gage for coolant temp.
I currently have a 160* thermostat in my car and even here in Vegas, when the winter temps are in the 40’s, my car will run as low as 167*. If ET says it’s bad, I would take it to the bank. With his experience and knowledge I think most of should use the factory or at most a 180*. Anybody want to buy a 160* thermostat?
Thanks,
Clayton from Las Vegas
I was reading some were that the ls-1 motor put out the peak power at 186. If this the case the 160 would be to cool and 190+ would be to hot. And running the ls/1 at 160 / 190 would be a power lost.
I am running a 170 in south florida daily driver and the vette is running about just under 190 on the highway per the DIC. I am no expert, but I feel that a 160 is just a little too cool for our ls-1/6 blocks. For lt-1 motors I went with a 160 and never had a problem. But we must remember the ls-1 is newer design and the old rule sometime get us down the wrong path.
I run mine year round, and Abq, NM gets pretty cold, I've seen below zero, and my convertable stays toasty inside, the heater keeps up just fine.




















