Oil Temp gauge problem DIC
I thought the sender might be bad, so I replaced it - identical low reading.
What does everyone else see?
Where might the problem be - just inaccurate?
I guess the major concern, is the difference at track temps. If it's consistently 13 degrees low, then I can deal with it, but there isn't any way to tell withouit installing an aftermarket gauge.
Suggestions???
Thanks,
Joel




Bill
Bill
You missed the point of my question. If I could be sure it was always the same 13 degrees off - through the entire range - that would be fine. My concern, is that I don't know. Suppose it's 70 degrees low when it reads 250?
The 13 degree low reading was ambient temp in the garage, without having run the engine.
Possibly the only way to know for sure, is to install a second gauge.
Joel
The oil temp sensor is way down low by the oil filter. The coolant sensor is higher in the head and engine compartment. Possibly you're seeing the temperature difference because the oil sensor is closer to what is probably a cold floor, while the coolant sensor is higher (warmer air) and is more protected from drafts in the more insulated part of the engine compartment.
When I'm cruising on the freeway on a 75 degree day the water temp stabilizes and holds right at 196 and the oil temp sits at about 201 ... on a really hot day (95 plus) coolant stays about the same but oil will sit at about 210.
HTH
The oil temp sensor is way down low by the oil filter. The coolant sensor is higher in the head and engine compartment. Possibly you're seeing the temperature difference because the oil sensor is closer to what is probably a cold floor, while the coolant sensor is higher (warmer air) and is more protected from drafts in the more insulated part of the engine compartment. HTH
The oil temp sensor is way down low by the oil filter. The coolant sensor is higher in the head and engine compartment. Possibly you're seeing the temperature difference because the oil sensor is closer to what is probably a cold floor, while the coolant sensor is higher (warmer air) and is more protected from drafts in the more insulated part of the engine compartment.
HTH
It's not possible to have that much of a diff in temp in a heated garage. There are no real drafts in this garage, it's fully insulated.
What is the diff in temps on these gauges before you start the car, after it has been sitting overnight?
Thanks,
Joel
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
It's not possible to have that much of a diff in temp in a heated garage. There are no real drafts in this garage, it's fully insulated.
What is the diff in temps on these gauges before you start the car, after it has been sitting overnight?
Thanks,
Joel
Thermocouples are, on average, accurate to about +/- 1.5 degrees in accuracy. If they are very old that can deviate from that.
see:
http://www.microlink.co.uk/tctable.html
and
http://www.temperatures.com/tcs.html
for WAY more detailed info on thermocouples (temp sensors, as I'm sure you recognize).
Again I've always written off the diff between coolant and oil sensors as a combination of things ...
The coolant sensor is higher, and above it is an insulating blanket built into the hood. It's gonna trap heat under the hood.
The coolant sensor is installed in the head ... in other words surrounded by a LARGE amount of metal, which is gonna change temperature more slowly than the oil temp sensor, which kinda hangs off the oil filter mount.
While it may seem hard to believe, in almost any room in a house it is not unusual to have a 10 degree (or even more) difference between ceiling and floor temperature. Add in the fact that the insulated hood liner is gonna trap heat under the hood ... a 13 degree difference just doesn'tt seem that far out of line.
Worst case ... say your oil temp sensor is off by 10 degrees (highly unlikely) ... from what I've read about thermocouples that error would be constant throughout the measures temp range. A thermocouple will not read +5 degrees at 40 degrees and +100 at 200 degrees. it will be off by +5 degrees at either temperature.
HTH
Go Oracle !!! Store it in a database and really track it ...
Thermocouples are, on average, accurate to about +/- 1.5 degrees in accuracy. If they are very old that can deviate from that.
see:
http://www.microlink.co.uk/tctable.html
and
http://www.temperatures.com/tcs.html
for WAY more detailed info on thermocouples (temp sensors, as I'm sure you recognize).
Again I've always written off the diff between coolant and oil sensors as a combination of things ...
The coolant sensor is higher, and above it is an insulating blanket built into the hood. It's gonna trap heat under the hood.
The coolant sensor is installed in the head ... in other words surrounded by a LARGE amount of metal, which is gonna change temperature more slowly than the oil temp sensor, which kinda hangs off the oil filter mount.
While it may seem hard to believe, in almost any room in a house it is not unusual to have a 10 degree (or even more) difference between ceiling and floor temperature. Add in the fact that the insulated hood liner is gonna trap heat under the hood ... a 13 degree difference just doesn'tt seem that far out of line.
Worst case ... say your oil temp sensor is off by 10 degrees (highly unlikely) ... from what I've read about thermocouples that error would be constant throughout the measures temp range. A thermocouple will not read +5 degrees at 40 degrees and +100 at 200 degrees. it will be off by +5 degrees at either temperature.
HTH
Go Oracle !!! Store it in a database and really track it ...
QUOTE]
Thanks everyone, the discussion does alleviate some of my concerns about non-linearity of readings as oil temp gets into the real operating range. As an aside, there is no hood blanket on the car, and I had the hood opened, so there's no heat trapped. Temp in the garage is constant, within 2-3 degrees.
While there can certainly be a noticable difference between floor and ceiling in a room, that's normally about 8'. We're looking at something around 12" here...
Thanks,
Joel









