Quick HP ?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Apr 12, 2007 | 12:45 AM

vetteman012002

Thread Starter

Pro

Joined: Apr 2003

Posts: 641

Likes: 0

From: Middletown MD

Quick HP ?

If a car makes 494FWHP what does it make to the wheels? I can't remember what the % difference is, and this is through an auto.

Thanks

Apr 12, 2007 | 01:05 AM

brucemoose2

Racer

Joined: Nov 2002

Posts: 412

Likes: 1

From: CT

Quote:

Originally Posted by vetteman012002

If a car makes 494FWHP what does it make to the wheels? I can't remember what the % difference is, and this is through an auto.

Thanks

Depends on the dyno, trans, etc. Lots of variables. Assuming this is a C5 with an auto... Very conservatively, 70% of the crankshaft hp - so 345.8. On the "ego-boost" end of the spectrum, 85% of the crankshaft hp - so 419.9. Take your pick...

Apr 12, 2007 | 01:30 AM

SLPRC5

Le Mans Master

Joined: Aug 2003

Posts: 9,298

Likes: 4

From: American Canyon Lethal Injection

Formula conversion is as follows.
Auto= divide RWHP by .82 and it will give you the flywheel HP.
M6= divide RWHP by .88 and it will give you the flywheel HP

Apr 12, 2007 | 05:13 PM

1965imp

Racer

Joined: Jan 2006

Posts: 347

Likes: 0

From: Chicago Heights ILLINOIS

Quote:

Originally Posted by brucemoose2

This is a very smart man. I hope everyone reads this

Apr 12, 2007 | 05:46 PM

kilrb

Pro

Joined: Jan 2005

Posts: 559

Likes: 1

From: Lenexa Kansas

Quote:

Originally Posted by brucemoose2

I don't get it... A '99 C5 is rated at 345 at the crank, and usually hit around 300-305 whp on a dyno, which is a 12.5-13% drivetrain loss for a manual. I believe an auto is between 290 and 295, which would be 15.5-16%. So why would you say 85% is ego-boosting. It might be a tad high, but I haven't seen many stock LS1's hitting 241.5whp (using your numbers). Not tryign to pick a fight, just confused.

Apr 12, 2007 | 06:07 PM

itchynackers

Pro

Joined: Aug 2004

Posts: 651

Likes: 1

From: Janesville WI

Maybe he's using the 1965 impala losses, which might be 30%.

Apr 12, 2007 | 10:30 PM

brucemoose2

Racer

Joined: Nov 2002

Posts: 412

Likes: 1

From: CT

Not all dynos will give you the same numbers. A Mustang dyno is not the same as a Dynojet. And many times the same brand dyno will give you different results. The question didn't specify enough details to give an accurate answer. He didn't say he was asking about a C5 - some of you are making that assumption - not that it's a crazy assumption... Anyway, 30% is not unreasonable for some transmission/rearend combinations. Corvettes just happen to have a pretty efficient driveline.

Apr 12, 2007 | 11:15 PM

1965imp

Racer

Joined: Jan 2006

Posts: 347

Likes: 0

From: Chicago Heights ILLINOIS

The proof is how these cars perform at the track-NOT WHAT THE DYNO NUMBERS ARE.

Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

5 Best & 5 Most Overrated Corvette Track Packages of All Time!

Joe Kucinski

Every 2027 Corvette Engine Explained

Joe Kucinski

Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette

Verdad Gallardo

10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

Joe Kucinski

Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

Brett Foote

10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

Michael S. Palmer

8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Pouria Savadkouei

10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Joe Kucinski

How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Joe Kucinski

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Michael S. Palmer

Apr 13, 2007 | 09:06 AM

kilrb

Pro

Joined: Jan 2005

Posts: 559

Likes: 1

From: Lenexa Kansas

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1965imp

The proof is how these cars perform at the track-NOT WHAT THE DYNO NUMBERS ARE.

So you are saying Chevy marketed my 99 FRC at 345 crank hp, when it really had 435 crank hp? I know GM definitely under-rated the F-bodies, as they crank out the same whp numbers as their Corvette bretheren. But to assume that my stock 305whp C5 is really making 435.7 crank hp seems absurd...

Reply Subscribe