Factory Five GTM Supercar!
See the problem is... it doesn't really "drive" or handle like a true mid-engine car though... does it?
Does really well of course with it's front engine, trans axle setup, but it would be better if it was a real mid-engine car.
That car is what the Corvette should have been 20 years ago.
I have no problem obliterating Porsche TTs, boxters, NSXs etc etc etc....
If mid engine design is so superior then why is the C6R obliterating everything in ALMS and LMS so bad that nobody wants to play anymore.
Mid engine does give you a nice polar moment of inertia and it does squat nicely under braking, but it doesn't magically handle better than the C5 setup.
That said the FFR GTM is very awesome, but not necisarily what the Corvette needs to be.
BTW, Kook made those headers for those cars
Last edited by TNTC5; May 20, 2007 at 02:13 PM.
Here are some shots of my car in front of the FFR trailer.





David
That is a good question, I'm curious to hear the answer as well.Also, with the air filter so close to the exhaust, I'm sure the intake temps suffer. Although, the insane power to weight ratio of that car probably doesn't make it noticeable...
Still, I'm surprised they did not incorporate a shroud and some inlet ducting from the sides... or perhaps the roof like the McLaren F1 and other mid/rear engine cars. I know roof ducting blocks the rear window, but I think anything would be better than a filter sitting right at the TB over the hot exhaust.
What "true" mid-engine cars have you driven that you're comparing a C5/C6 to?
GTM has a weight distribution more similar to a 911 with it's rear mid-engine design. I think it has the potential to handle better than a 911, but the light weight is outstanding.
Have a good one,
Mike
See the problem is... it doesn't really "drive" or handle like a true mid-engine car though... does it?
Does really well of course with it's front engine, trans axle setup, but it would be better if it was a real mid-engine car.
That car is what the Corvette should have been 20 years ago.
Any answers to this? I'm quite curious as a buddy of mine is close to starting a 6.2 tt build.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Perhaps a "beaten" donor C5 and this kit would be a terrific project - SOMEDAY!
Will you guys start crying if I make fun of the interior or the leaf springs next?
While costs are certainly a main reason why the corvette has some of those weird attributes, sometimes I think the engineers have intentionally held back because they think they'll alienate the old-school Corvette owners. Zora would have had a good time with you guys...
Will you guys start crying if I make fun of the interior or the leaf springs next?
While costs are certainly a main reason why the corvette has some of those weird attributes, sometimes I think the engineers have intentionally held back because they think they'll alienate the old-school Corvette owners. Zora would have had a good time with you guys...
The 'Corvette tradition' calls for many of the characteristics that get discussed here: notchy shifting, harsh ride, etc. plus plastic body. GM knows Corvette is a brand they don't want to screw up and GM is too cheap to make substantive changes to raise the level of materials, etc. They [GM] just don't sell a lot of Corvettes. And if the next Corvette was a twin turbo mid-engine four-cam V-6 with paddle-shift about the size of a Boxster, EVERYONE would scream that 'it's not a real Corvette.'
Second, the Cayman (and all 911s) are rear engine cars, meaning the majority of the engine weight is above or behind the rear axle. I expect the GTM to have a better weight distribution than the Porsches.
Where have you driven the NSX and the Vette to compare? (BTW, the NSX is one of my all-time lustful cars!
)And, I was surprised you didn't go off on the transverse springs or pitifully old and outdated pushrod engines in the first place. The issue isn't just cost, but weight, both overall and at the corners. Coil overs are cool, and for the 1% of owners that know how to use them, offer great adjustability. For the other 99% of us, the transverse spring system works just as well.
The interior quality isn't as good as it could be, but I don't find the Porsche or BMW interiors to be any better, just different.
Have a good one,
Mike
The interior quality isn't as good as it could be, but I don't find the Porsche or BMW interiors to be any better, just different.
Have a good one,
Mike
Second, the Cayman (and all 911s) are rear engine cars, meaning the majority of the engine weight is above or behind the rear axle. I expect the GTM to have a better weight distribution than the Porsches.
Where have you driven the NSX and the Vette to compare? (BTW, the NSX is one of my all-time lustful cars!
)And, I was surprised you didn't go off on the transverse springs or pitifully old and outdated pushrod engines in the first place. The issue isn't just cost, but weight, both overall and at the corners. Coil overs are cool, and for the 1% of owners that know how to use them, offer great adjustability. For the other 99% of us, the transverse spring system works just as well.
The interior quality isn't as good as it could be, but I don't find the Porsche or BMW interiors to be any better, just different.
Have a good one,
Mike
to a point [how's that for the ultimate hedge?]I think this is thread [which we've succeeded in hijacking
One thing I've noticed over the years is "perceived value" plays a huge role in what people think of cars. And now with the dollar at .50 British pounds and 2/3s of a Euro IIRC, Corvettes look pretty good because imported cars are relatively more expensive. A Corvette must look like the steal of the Century in Europe.
In the end, I think the greatest determinant of perceived value is Brand. Some people desire the Porsche brand, others the Corvette brand, etc. To me, Brand has to be a huge issue, otherwise why would so many people buy Lotuses when they know they're put together with chewing gum and sticky tape and they'll own them for five years and drive them only 15k miles.
I wouldn't do it, but if someone ran a "I bought a Corvette because..."poll here and one of the choices was "I only buy American," there would be a significant number of respondents who would choose it. Maybe I'm FOS, I don't know; I do notice that there's a bias towards patriotic feelings and buy America hereabouts. It only makes sense, I guess.
The 'Corvette tradition' calls for many of the characteristics that get discussed here: notchy shifting, harsh ride, etc. plus plastic body. GM knows Corvette is a brand they don't want to screw up and GM is too cheap to make substantive changes to raise the level of materials, etc. They [GM] just don't sell a lot of Corvettes. And if the next Corvette was a twin turbo mid-engine four-cam V-6 with paddle-shift about the size of a Boxster, EVERYONE would scream that 'it's not a real Corvette.'
If corvette's were suddenly refined mid-engine euro-cars they'd be lucky to probably sell 1/2 what they sell.
Also, you couldn't give me a porche cayman. Dealerships take like 4 hours to change the air filter. You have to completely disassemble the interior covers over the engine. I've spent a good chunk of time behind the wheel of one and even though I'd love to drive one, I wouldn't want to own it. Simple normally user-serviced items are a complete nightmare. Open the hatch of one once. All you have is a flap you can open to check oil level and washer fluid. Everything else is under carpet.
The factory 5 car does look interesting. Someone make a MacLaren F1 kit please!




















