When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Baseline: LS1-326 rwhp on a dyno. This, before heads and cam. I assume that heads and cam should produce 75 hp. Is that at flywheel or the rw's?If at flywheel that represents a 60 rwhp increase or 386 rwhp or about 480 hp at the flywheel. If the 75 hp is net to the rear wheels then I would be about 500 hp at the flywheel. Let me know your thoughts.
The HP gains are usually in terms of rwhp. That being said, I would be disappointed if I spent the money on a H/C package and only got 75 rwhp. I would expect a minimum of 100, and of course that's after all the anciallry bolt ons are done (headers/intake etc.).
Additionally, the driveline loss of hp is usually about 17% for an MN6. More for an auto. So 380 rwhp equates to, roughly, 460 crank hp.
Not to argue but its probably a little more than 12 but less than 17.
I agree an M6 has about 12% HP loss and an A4 about 20%--But when it comes to heads and cam i think most cams only make about 35-45 RWHP and the best of heads about 40 RWHP (accoding to articles in GM Hi Tech Performance magazine) so a hds/cam package average would be anywhere from 50- 85 RWHP-- average being 60--As an example with my .221/.221 .560/.560 -114 cam and a new set of LS6 mildly ported and cleaned up heads only dynoed an additional 52 RWHP
AFR heads report in articles to make 40 RWHP on their 205's----If you do the math on my set-up my stock LS6 mild ported heads only made 17 RWHP---all the usual bolt-ons too LT's etc------
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12'-'13-'14-'15
Originally Posted by Irish Whiskey
Installer/tuner is one of best in the nation and he stated loss of 20% for A4,
He is wrong. The A4 is in the 15% area and M6 is 12%. This has been proven by many, many baseline dynos showing 345 HP 97-00 A4 cars at 295-305HP and M6 at 300-315. There are some that are a little lower or a little higher on a dynojet but they are the exception rather than the norm. 20% loss on an A4 would mean you lose 70HP on a 350HP car. No way
Now on to H/C packages. On my A4 2000 I had a 228 .581 114 LSA XER cam only with all bolt ons and made 375HP/401TQ. With my M6 car with AFR 205 milled to 59cc and 228/232 .585/.591 114LSA XER with all bolt ons I should see about 440HP/400TQ.
He is wrong. The A4 is in the 15% area and M6 is 12%. This has been proven by many, many baseline dynos showing 345 HP 97-00 A4 cars at 295-305HP and M6 at 300-315. There are some that are a little lower or a little higher on a dynojet but they are the exception rather than the norm. 20% loss on an A4 would mean you lose 70HP on a 350HP car. No way
Maybe the tuner was refering to a mustang dyno instaed of a dynojet???
A 350hp at the crank reguires about 45 hp to power the driveline and you end up with 305RWHP. Im thinkig that a 505HP engine still requires that same amount of hp to power the driveline and you end up with about 460RWHP. So you do some mods on your car and end up with a dyno rwhp figure of 335. So how can you figure what your crank hp is now? Am I a nut and just have too much time on my hands? The cold weather is setting in now in the N.E. It doesnt look like i will be driving the Vette for the next 5 months or so.
A 350hp at the crank reguires about 45 hp to power the driveline and you end up with 305RWHP. Im thinkig that a 505HP engine still requires that same amount of hp to power the driveline and you end up with about 460RWHP. So you do some mods on your car and end up with a dyno rwhp figure of 335. So how can you figure what your crank hp is now? Am I a nut and just have too much time on my hands? The cold weather is setting in now in the N.E. It doesnt look like i will be driving the Vette for the next 5 months or so.
I was always under the impression that it is a percentage loss, not a fixed number of hp. This is pure speculation, but I would guess drivetrain loss will typically fall within a percentage range due to the beefier and beefier suspensions required for higher hp applications. For instance, do you expect a car like an Acura TSX rated with 195hp to put out 150 at the wheel? They usually hit 165-170, which falls within the usual 12-15% drivetrain loss you see across the board.
So how do you propose to get real HP? I am curious
Cajun
Hell, make up a number. It will have as much basis as this excersize. The OP started with made up numbers and is trying to extrapolize from those. I'm not being critical. If the question was how much loss between an engine dyno and a chassis dyno that's another question. Most people will use 15% for an M6 and 18-20% for an A4.
He is wrong. The A4 is in the 15% area and M6 is 12%. This has been proven by many, many baseline dynos showing 345 HP 97-00 A4 cars at 295-305HP and M6 at 300-315. There are some that are a little lower or a little higher on a dynojet but they are the exception rather than the norm. 20% loss on an A4 would mean you lose 70HP on a 350HP car. No way
Now on to H/C packages. On my A4 2000 I had a 228 .581 114 LSA XER cam only with all bolt ons and made 375HP/401TQ. With my M6 car with AFR 205 milled to 59cc and 228/232 .585/.591 114LSA XER with all bolt ons I should see about 440HP/400TQ.
I see stock A4 corvettes at our local dyno shop make RWHP in the 280 range all the time---The typical CAI and catback puts them in the 300 range---hdd/cam/LT's in the 400 range--
20% seems to be more accurate as far as i've seen--(350-70=280)
If you use this as a basis then all the mods I listed above make sense to me-- I have NEVER seen a stock A4 corvette make 300 RWHP--and that is what they would be making if the powertrain loss was 15%
Wouldn't the percentage of loss in the drivetrain depend a lot on the power being applied. The more power applied the greater the percentage of loss? A good deal of the loss is due to the gear teeth rubbing against each other as they turn. That's why straight cut gears transmit more power than helical cut ones. I would think that since it's frictional losses, the more power applied, the more loss, as a percentage, you'll have.
If at flywheel that represents a 60 rwhp increase or 386 rwhp or about 480 hp at the flywheel. If the 75 hp is net to the rear wheels then I would be about 500 hp at the flywheel. Let me know your thoughts.
A lot of debat on a linear or decreasing application for a % calculation use as a translation between Engine Dyno and Chassis Dyno...
12,5% in the case of my ZO6, 575 FHP and 511 RWHP.
Hell, make up a number. It will have as much basis as this excersize. The OP started with made up numbers and is trying to extrapolize from those. I'm not being critical. If the question was how much loss between an engine dyno and a chassis dyno that's another question. Most people will use 15% for an M6 and 18-20% for an A4.
The "OP" started with an actual dynojet number of 326 rwhp with headers before heads and cam were added. The number only has to be approximate. It is for a poster on the car for the car show. My et/mph in the quarter mile will also be on the poster and they will not be approximate. 75hp and 20% loss for A4 were the variables I wanted others to take a look at.