When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Why does the C5 have so many computers for everything?
Why do our cars have BCM's and PCM's and EBTPCMS and QXRMPT whatever the heck they are's?! I understand the PCM to control the engine-no prob. But on a car without active handling or any of that other crap, what are all the expensive electronics really for?
From: Dear Karma, I have a list of people you missed.
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16
Originally Posted by Mike94ZLT1
Why do our cars have BCM's and PCM's and EBTPCMS and QXRMPT whatever the heck they are's?! I understand the PCM to control the engine-no prob. But on a car without active handling or any of that other crap, what are all the expensive electronics really for?
Cause puters do a better more efficient job overall.
Think WE got it "bad"? Check out a C6's system sometime! It even has a separate puter for the transmission. The TCM.
Cause puters do a better more efficient job overall.
Think WE got it "bad"? Check out a C6's system sometime! It even has a separate puter for the transmission. The TCM.
Of what?! Telling my window to roll up or down? I do that with a switch. Make the turn signals work? Turn signals worked fine in my old scottsdale, and that thing doesn't have a computer for ANYTHING. The point I am trying to make, is what realistically do we need all those computers for? Ok, on an automatic transmission, I can see that. But everything else?
Of what?! Telling my window to roll up or down? I do that with a switch. Make the turn signals work? Turn signals worked fine in my old scottsdale, and that thing doesn't have a computer for ANYTHING. The point I am trying to make, is what realistically do we need all those computers for? Ok, on an automatic transmission, I can see that. But everything else?
Ok, I don't know how old you are..but when is the last time you flooded a car..and had to sit and wait before it would start? How about changing the jets in the carb and timing for altitude correction? Changing the axle ratio used to mean changing the speedo gear in the trans. Panic stops meant locking up all the wheels..before ABS. Tuning used to be about experimentation, now the A/F ratio can be fine tuned for each application. The list goes on and on. I grew up working on and building carb cars, I don't miss them one bit.
Well I'm from a time where the climate control system in my car was a lever that you slide from heater to vent. That a tune up was something you did with a match book cover and a screw driver. No assist to braking, steering, or shifting. Oil bath air filtering and no engine oil filtering. No computer to tell you what % of oil life, you just smelled the dip stick or looked at the color.
Or you could have bought an '88-'90 Buick Riviera with the CRT touch screen that used eight (8) computers , that was a nite mare to diagnose.
Sometimes I think I miss the old days of my '64 GTO ( 3x2, 4 spd, 4.10) but now cars are faster , lighter, get better MPG, more comfortable. I plug in my scan machine and replace a part.
Well I'm from a time where the climate control system in my car was a lever that you slide from heater to vent. That a tune up was something you did with a match book cover and a screw driver. No assist to braking, steering, or shifting. Oil bath air filtering and no engine oil filtering. No computer to tell you what % of oil life, you just smelled the dip stick or looked at the color.
Or you could have bought an '88-'90 Buick Riviera with the CRT touch screen that used eight (8) computers , that was a nite mare to diagnose.
Sometimes I think I miss the old days of my '64 GTO ( 3x2, 4 spd, 4.10) but now cars are faster , lighter, get better MPG, more comfortable. I plug in my scan machine and replace a part.
I've been through those times too. But, on one hand, although the new cars are great, sometimes I miss the old days. It seems, sometimes, that cars now have bells and whistles simply for the sake of having bells and whistles.
Although I truly enjoy driving my C-5, it has developed a few random electrical quirks over the years that are annoying. The door locks usually work OK, but from time to time act up. The tire pressure monitor also acts strangely from time to time, and neither problem seems to have a solution, since they're random occurances.
Ok, I don't know how old you are..but when is the last time you flooded a car..and had to sit and wait before it would start? How about changing the jets in the carb and timing for altitude correction? Changing the axle ratio used to mean changing the speedo gear in the trans. Panic stops meant locking up all the wheels..before ABS. Tuning used to be about experimentation, now the A/F ratio can be fine tuned for each application. The list goes on and on. I grew up working on and building carb cars, I don't miss them one bit.
27, and I have owned several carbureted cars, heck my 37 Ford has a carbureted 327 sbc in it. I understand the PCM for fuel injection, I was not even questioning that. I was questioning the 14 other computers the car has that don't have ANYTHING to do with how the engine runs. My LS1 powered Camaro SS has a PCM as well, and it runs just fine without all the other fancy crap. Yes, the C5 is a WAY better car in just about every aspect, but the computers have nothing to do with it. A computer does not make my frame more solid. I do not have active handling, a computer has nothing to do with how my car handles. My interior fit and finish, while it leaves alot to be desired, is light years beyond a 4th gen F-body. But a computer has nothing to do with that.
Originally Posted by dieseldave56
Well I'm from a time where the climate control system in my car was a lever that you slide from heater to vent. That a tune up was something you did with a match book cover and a screw driver. No assist to braking, steering, or shifting. Oil bath air filtering and no engine oil filtering. No computer to tell you what % of oil life, you just smelled the dip stick or looked at the color.
Or you could have bought an '88-'90 Buick Riviera with the CRT touch screen that used eight (8) computers , that was a nite mare to diagnose.
Sometimes I think I miss the old days of my '64 GTO ( 3x2, 4 spd, 4.10) but now cars are faster , lighter, get better MPG, more comfortable. I plug in my scan machine and replace a part.
My FRC has the single zone climate control with the ***** to turn for adjusting temperature and blower speed. I see no need for a computer in that.
Originally Posted by leadfoot4
I've been through those times too. But, on one hand, although the new cars are great, sometimes I miss the old days. It seems, sometimes, that cars now have bells and whistles simply for the sake of having bells and whistles.
Although I truly enjoy driving my C-5, it has developed a few random electrical quirks over the years that are annoying. The door locks usually work OK, but from time to time act up. The tire pressure monitor also acts strangely from time to time, and neither problem seems to have a solution, since they're random occurances.
I enjoy my C5 as well, I just question why it was built and designed the way it was.
The days of the backyard mechanic are essentially over with. Without the manuals and a TechII, you really can't do a lot although at least you have the code display with the C-5's that GM conventiently removed on the C-6 which has a lot more of these modules throughout.
The PCM is a good idea for the tuning capabilities which is why these cars get upwards of 30mpg as opposed to a carb engine and basic electrical that gets half that mileage. The BCM was all about controlling the accessories and reporting errors so that its easeier to find the issues, but again, without a TechII (which are outrageously exspensive), you really can't do anything...GM's method to force the backyard mechanic out of business and them into their dealerships for service.
Heaven help me when something doesn't work right on my '07 as there are no diagnostics now and of course GM speeded up the communication buss with the ODBII/CAN. The computer rolls down the windows 1/2 inch each time you push the door open button so you can open the door! The good part about it though, no more water leaks like the C-5's have.
One of the things that GM has done for years is to introduce new technologies on the Corvette. The 97 had all of this technology when it came out and I can't think of any other GM car that had it at that time. Now they all do.
The computers take a bunch of wiring and relays out of the car and saves a bunch of weight and expense
My drivers door module has more relays than the whole complete car, of the other Vettes I've owned. (C1,C2,C3) We won't even mention the amount of wireing in the C5.
It is true, by sending digital signals a lot of wiring is eliminated. You only need one wire pair going to door to control windows, locks, mirrors, etc.
You young guys probably don't even know what a distributor looks like, crank sensors and computers are MUCH BETTER. Computers made fuel injection easy, more power AND better fuel economy !
Last edited by Oldvetter; Nov 2, 2008 at 08:23 PM.
Its now apparent to me that Mike94ZLT1 is making comparable reference to late model vs earlier models. In that regard the additional computers are added for either comfort , convience or performance.
Needed? The mfg'er adds comfort and convience to meet the demands of the larger % of customers. Note; that my personal preference is less 'bells & whistles', as in the '92 Vipers ( no roll up windows or A/C, ect). Sports cars to me should not have climate controled air conditioning or electric windows or a sound system for that matter.
Performance is another matter. Compare the P51 Mustang ( arguably the best psiton driven fighter of all time) to a F-22 Raptor ( which could not fly without computers). No contest in any respect. Pure performance.
There was a time that cars were made to order. A list of options a mile long that one would just 'check off', but now options are in packages or just plain standard equipment. Its economics.
..... There was a time that cars were made to order. A list of options a mile long that one would just 'check off', but now options are in packages or just plain standard equipment. Its economics.
Boy, DO I MISS THOSE DAYS !!!!!!! I mean the ability to order a car a' la'carte....
Its now apparent to me that Mike94ZLT1 is making comparable reference to late model vs earlier models. In that regard the additional computers are added for either comfort , convience or performance.
Needed? The mfg'er adds comfort and convience to meet the demands of the larger % of customers. Note; that my personal preference is less 'bells & whistles', as in the '92 Vipers ( no roll up windows or A/C, ect). Sports cars to me should not have climate controled air conditioning or electric windows or a sound system for that matter.
Performance is another matter. Compare the P51 Mustang ( arguably the best psiton driven fighter of all time) to a F-22 Raptor ( which could not fly without computers). No contest in any respect. Pure performance.
There was a time that cars were made to order. A list of options a mile long that one would just 'check off', but now options are in packages or just plain standard equipment. Its economics.
You seem to understand my question better than most. Other than a car with dual climate AC, how does a computer make my car more comfortable? Seriously, other than running the engine and making my gauges function, I see no need for any of that expensive crap. Why do I need a steering wheel position sensor? What the hell is magnasteer? It all sounds like a stupid gimmick to me. I know that there is a direct link between my steering wheel and the steering rack. I know that the temperature of my car is controlled by me turning a ****, not by a computer. And I know that my windows do not need a computer to roll down, they need me to push a button. I wonder if half this crap could be removed from the car, and a stand alone engine controller would work if you could find some way to make the gauges work....