Having issues with my stock shifter. I think maybe it's been modified for a shorter throw, but I'm not the original owner, so I'm not too sure. Either way, it's been acting up on me and I've decided to take advantage of the Christmas season. Any recommendations? I'm looking at the B&M Ripper right now, but have also seen a lot of recommendations for the Hurst. Anyone want to vouch for the B&M. I've been told the B&M bushings are Aluminum and thus superior to the stock ones. Does the Hurst come with new ones? Aluminum?

Also, heard good things about MGW. http://www.mgwltd.com/corvette_short..._shifter.shtml

 

A lot of people like the C6 shifter.

 

Now that I'm reading a little more... people are going NUTS for this MGW shifter. Any votes?

 

Guys I'm selling myself right out of the B&M and into the MGW. Anybody willing to talk me out of this.... anyone?

 

Ive had the B&M and hurst both are junk compared to the MGW. Both the junk shifter rattled and had noise. The MGW is smooth with no vibration no rattle and no noise. Hands down the best shifter on the market for the C5/C6 corvette and George is a super great guy to deal with

Rob

 

How's the "side-to-side" action on the MGW? This is going in my daily driver and I don't want anything too stiff. However, right now I'm working with a stock C5 that was shortened. It's stiff AND sloppy at the same time... awful. So I'm pretty sure anything would be an improvement right now.

 

The side to side of the MGW is great. Its very smooth yet tight, The B&M i had was very stiff. You will be very happy with the MGW just order already!!!

Rob

 

I have the MGW and I love it. I can't speak for the other aftermarket shifters, but compared to the stock one the MGW is miles better. As far as the feel of the shifter it was be a bit stiff at first, but after about a week it smoothed out significantly. There is no heavy centering spring. The MGW used the centering springs built into the transmission.

 

Cool cool. Did you guys have to re-use the stock boot? I'm hearing conflicting stories of people cutting theirs, others just pulling it over... not sure what anyone is talking about though cause I haven't played with this thing yet. Also, some shifters come with solid bushing as opposed to the rubbery stock ones. It looks like the MGW uses the stock ones. I was reading in THIS THREAD how it's good to replace the bushings. I've got about 90k on a 99. Should these be replaced? If so, how? THANKS GUYS!

Oh yeah, also... what **** are you guys using. It looks like the MGW gripper has a lot of extra "length" to it at the base. This appears to add to the throw, but I could be wrong. I'm looking to go with a "billiard" ball style shift **** which of course wouldn't have the extra base that the MGW Gripper does. Is this going to make my throw even shorter? Too short even?

 

Boot, bushings, *****.... anyone?

 

I have a Hurst shifter in my C-5. I don't drive the car a lot, however the unit has been in place for 7 years, and I'm very happy with it. I also have a round, aluminum shift ball that I purchased from Zip Products, IIRC, as well as a "short" boot that I think I purchased from 'Vette Essentials.

Before you toss the shifter you now have, make sure that it's adjusted properly. If you remove the boot, you'll see the shift rod that goes down the left side of the tunnel. There's a clamp on the rod, and a hole in the clamp that's supposed to line up with a corresponding hole in the shift rod, when the shifter is in "neutral".

The factory also provides a pin that goes through the shift rod, holding the clamp and rod in place while being adjusted. It's usually found on a clip that's part of the shifter. If these two "gauge holes" aren't in alignment, you should loosen the clamp, and make the necessary adjustment.

 

Well, to be honest I'm kind of just taking advantage of the holiday season here.... already dropped $250 on my significant other so she's going to return the favor! I'll still check out the adjustment though. How about those bushings? Any advice on replacing them? I think the MGW reuses the stock bushings right?

 

The C5 coupe and convertible came oem with rubber bushings. The Z06 came with metal bushings. The former allows for less vibration/noise. The latter allows for more precise feel and will not deteriorate. They might allow more vibration/noise. The bushings isolate the shifter above the torque tube. They're oval in shape and stepped in design.
When you R&R your shifter, inspect the bushings for type and any signs of deterioration. If they're rubber and cracked, replace them with new rubber or metal.
All C5/Z06 models used the same shifter...in fact all shifters from '97 to '08 ('09?) are basically the same stamped metal construction except for the ergonomic ****, manner of **** attachment, boot, and bent back lever.
You can probably still use your oem C5/Z06 boot. You might have to slightly modify it at the top portion. Some owners have done this with the also popular C6/Z06 shifters. Snip some threads, roll in under and zip tie. Or you can buy an after market boot from several sources.
As to using the oem **** on the MGW, that I am not certain of. Maybe a message to MGW would answer that? Or here's someone with a similar question...
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c5-t...rent-****.html

 

Are you sure the shifter is causing the problems?
You don't want to install a new shifter, only to find the shifter was not the problem at all. There is not much you can do to a stock shifter to modify it other than shorten the shaft. I have not seen anyone try to modify the internal part.
By the way, I have had a Hurst for over 5 years, and would not go back to the stock shifter, but it does take more effort to shift since the leverage is reduced. What you gain as far as precise feel is worth the switch.

 

I give for the MGW
Chris

 

I have had the Hurst for 3 yrs. now without a single vibration, noise, etc. It shifts nice and side to side motion is quick and easy. I took my time installing and started with the stock springs. I hammer it pretty good and (so far) have not missed a shift.