When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
It would probably cost you the same to either:
1) buy a bigger MAF and have to get it tuned
2) delete the MAF and have your car tuned to run speed density.
leave it stock. changing the MAF will only work for a short time. the computer will eventually correct itself for the new MAF and run the same way it was before.
SD works best in stable climates without wild temperature/humidity swings.
Breecher, you live in WI too, where we enjoy anything but that stability.
That's the one and only reason MAFs are still useful, they are a great compensator for weather.
Ive been thinking that engine avatar picture looked familiar....
Very true, but sometimes SD is the only way to go once you reach a certain point. I know thats the point were at with the Blue Z06. This winter it got a new mill and a SD conversion.
leave it stock. changing the MAF will only work for a short time. the computer will eventually correct itself for the new MAF and run the same way it was before.
Solid advice for a stock-sih 346 engine. But not applicable to this discussion.
When you step up into the 427-447 CI engine arena, like what's being discussed here (OP did say LS7-based), and assuming a minimum of a 90mm TB (95 and 102 TBs being widely used out there too), the stock 75 or 85 mm MAF quickly becomes a considerable restriction in the intake tract.
Something like this , or this can be quite beneficial in allowing the big cube engine to get the air it needs, while still measuring the incoming airflow...if your desire is to keep a MAF sensor at all.
Solid advice for a stock-sih 346 engine. But not applicable to this discussion.
When you step up into the 427-447 CI engine arena, like what's being discussed here (OP did say LS7-based), and assuming a minimum of a 90mm TB (95 and 102 TBs being widely used out there too), the stock 75 or 85 mm MAF quickly becomes a considerable restriction in the intake tract.
Something like this , or this can be quite beneficial in allowing the big cube engine to get the air it needs, while still measuring the incoming airflow...if your desire is to keep a MAF sensor at all.
Thanx, great input as always on this forum, I will let you guys know it works out when start tuning the new setup.
Did 10.41 on the quarter mile with the old setup so now I am looking in to going down towards 9.50 times this season...
Good info here So what would you guys recommend for my set-up (mods in sig below). I am going to be adding the Vararam air-bridge and relocating the MAF closer to hte ported 90mm TB.