When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
My '03 Z06 has 92k miles applied by the first owner - I bought the vehicle from a salvage auction and am the 2nd owner. While doing other repairs, I just changed the OEM rear shocks to the "better", read cheaper and made in Mexico, C6 Z06 rear shocks. Now, the rears that I removed did not need to be removed - they both appear to function and have no leaks. They were made in the US. To be honest, I feel foolish to have removed them. I had read good reviews about the 2004 shocks - this being my first Corvette, I was reluctant to buy an '03 car and my 1st choice was to find a 'nice' 04. I'm not sorry I bought the '03 - well I am a little, but that's another story, and nothing to do with the actual vehicle!
My question, to the collective wisdom of the forum, is should I bother changing the front shocks - should I just wait until I notice a leak or fail? I'd prefer to keep what's functioning there and work on other issues.
My '03 Z06 has 92k miles applied by the first owner - I bought the vehicle from a salvage auction and am the 2nd owner. While doing other repairs, I just changed the OEM rear shocks to the "better", read cheaper and made in Mexico, C6 Z06 rear shocks. Now, the rears that I removed did not need to be removed - they both appear to function and have no leaks. They were made in the US. To be honest, I feel foolish to have removed them. I had read good reviews about the 2004 shocks - this being my first Corvette, I was reluctant to buy an '03 car and my 1st choice was to find a 'nice' 04. I'm not sorry I bought the '03 - well I am a little, but that's another story, and nothing to do with the actual vehicle!
My question, to the collective wisdom of the forum, is should I bother changing the front shocks - should I just wait until I notice a leak or fail? I'd prefer to keep what's functioning there and work on other issues.
Originally Posted by 8VETTE7
I'm a strong believer in if a part ain't broke don't fix it unless your mod'ing it.
While I agree with the "if it ain't broke...." philosophy, given the milage and the fact that you have already changed out the rears, I would do the fronts. If only to keep them in sync. Meaning only that you will know that both front and rears were changed out at the same time and are accumlating wear at basically the same rate. Up to you and whatever your budget allows in the end. Good luck with your ride.
I believe that shocks are like tires. They should always be changed out as a full set. I would've gone with the Bilsteins if I was in your shoes. I truly believe that you cannot get better shocks for the price. It completely transformed my car. Plus, they come with a lifetime warranty.
The front shocks are probably fine, but, I would go ahead and change them since you've already changed the rears. Sounds like you're doing a good bit of work on the car and now is an opportune time to get this done and not have to worry about it for a long time. Since the rears are fresh the fronts should be as well. If you're going with the C6Z shocks the price is right! My car has 105k mile on it and I'm getting ready to install the C6Z shocks as well.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.