tire/wheel questions


Tires will be either MICHELIN Pilot Super Sport or MICHELIN Pilot Sport PS2. I'm trying to maintain at least a .05" difference between front/rear tires for the traction control. If I remember correctly, oem Z06 tires are .08" difference front/rear.
The sizes will be either 265/35x18" and 295/30x19" (MICHELIN doesn't make 295/35x19") w/ .07" difference or 275/35x18" and 305/30x19" w/ .06" difference (I think I have the differences correct). Does anyone see any issues with either combination? Other than appearance, any benefits of one over the other?
I don't want the tires sticking out beyond the fenders, rubbing on the inner fenders, traction control problems, having to remove rear brake ducts, etc. I don't want to use adapters or spacers. The car is already lowered 5/8" and 3/4" and I have no plans to go lower. Any issues there foreseen?
Thanks.
Last edited by hotwheels57; Oct 23, 2011 at 02:25 PM.
http://www.rimsntires.com/specs.jsp
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c5-g...ah-issues.html
Last edited by johnpowe; Oct 23, 2011 at 04:13 PM. Reason: added thread loc


http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html




CCW SP500 @ 23.9#
305/30-19" on 19x11" and 265/35-18" on 18x10" Y rated MICHELIN Super Sport
Front 26.2" diameter and 25.3" is a .9" difference
Last edited by hotwheels57; Oct 24, 2011 at 01:52 PM.

Are you sure that the ABS and Traction Control systems will tolerate that amount of differential?
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts


Is the critical measurement for ABS and Traction Control based on the diameter difference front/rear?
Or is it the circumference difference front/rear?
I figured erring on the plus side of the oem diameter difference between front/rear would be better than lesser difference. Am I incorrect?
http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html
I've read here to use no less than .5" difference between front/rear tires (assuming diameter) for the ABS and Traction Control.
The oem sizes for a Z06 are:
265/40-17”@ 25.3” diameter, 79.6” circumference
295/35-18”@ 26.1” diameter, 82.1” circumference
.8” difference in diameter
2.5” difference in circumference
The upgraded sizes I've chosen are:
265/35-18”@ 25.3” diameter, 79.5” circumference
305/30-19”@ 26.2” diameter, 82.3” circumference
.9” difference in diameter
2.8” difference in circumference
For what it's worth, CCW said they typically see:
275/35-18” @ 25.6” diameter, 80.4” circumference
305/30-19” @ 26.2” diameter, 82.3” circumference
.6” difference in diameter
1.9” difference in circumference
Last edited by hotwheels57; Oct 24, 2011 at 07:23 PM.

I've always thought the critical measurement for ABS and Traction Control is expressed as F/R tire diameter difference, and not total circumference difference.
You should be fine with your choice of tire sizes.


I've always thought the critical measurement for ABS and Traction Control is expressed as F/R tire diameter difference, and not total circumference difference.
You should be fine with your choice of tire sizes.
The difference between the oem front/rear tires/wheels of a Z06 is .8" (R/26.1"-F/25.3"). The difference between the upgraded tires/wheels I've chosen is .9" (R/26.2-F/25.3"). That's the +.1" difference.
The new front tires are the same diameter as the oem. The new rear tires are +.1" different than the oem.
The alternate front 275/35-18" tires that CCW said is popular would present a +.6" difference between front/rear (F/26.2-R/25.6"). That's less than the oem front/rear tire difference. I thought that was cutting it to close to the suggested (?) no less than .5" difference front/rear.
Just to relieve my mind, I just confirmed with CCW that the tire combination I've chosen is within the limits of the ABS and TC systems. Dan said should there be any issues, just to call them. They'd take care of any problem. That says so much about CCW and their commitment to having satisfied customers.
Last edited by hotwheels57; Oct 25, 2011 at 12:05 PM.



That's amazing customer service.
Last edited by hotwheels57; Oct 27, 2011 at 01:38 PM.









