When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Auto's do dyno lower. My '02 with 4800mi dyno'd at 315.1 hp and 331.9 tq. From what I hear auto are suppose to have 5% more parasitic loss than 6 speeds. :cheers:
I don't think they seem to low. I just dynoed my 97 A4 (blackwing,TPIS,Stinger,LS1 EDIT tuning) on a "mustang dyno" and it only laid 302 HP and 329 ft TQ at the rears. It has a 2:73 rear in it :cry.
My brand new 2002 A4 (Vortex Rammer is my only Mod) dyno'ed at 300 RWHP/312 RWTQ. This is about what I was expecting, because you "lose" 15% from the flywheel to the rear wheels.
But, on all 3 runs, my print-out showed a 50-60 HP drop-off between 5,800 and 6,200 RPM's. My Chevy dealership checked with Detroit to see if there was a PCM update, but they didn't have anything.
I am going to digitize and post my dyno reports, but has anyone else seen anything like this?
For those of you who posted your Dyno #'s, what kind of dyno were you on? Dynojet or Mustang? i've been told that dynojet is going to give bigger Numbers......
From what I understand, it is generally accepted that there is approximately a 20% drivetrain loss for automatics and 15% loss for manuals, and a little less for a powertrain with a transverse layout (most FWD or mid-engine like MR2/NSX - no loss at differential). With a 20% loss, 290HP = 362HP.
And I have to agree, DynoJet is the standard.
Your numbers are realistic, I'm skeptical of many of the dyno numbers posted on this and other forums. My 01 Z06 with a Vortex and TPIS long tube headers dynoed at 337 SAE on one dyno and 345 on another a week later.