Regular C5 to Z06 performance?
Also how do you bring the Coupe up to the Z06s chassis rigidity?
IMO, 460 HP on a LS1 block is not a problem whatsoever for durabilty. The LS1 is taking some brutal power out there and holding up quite well. The blocks from a strength durability perspective with the power levels were seeing out there just arnt that much different. Get over 1000 HP and mabey there will be some measurable durability results at the end of the day. But I doubt it since to get to those levels either block would have to be resleeved and worked all over the place. Most would probably opt for the C5-R Block, or an iron block at that point anyway. Also from what I understand late late 2001 and all of 2002 production use the same block.
Rigidity can easiliy be overcome with suspension upgrades or rollbar, crossbar, etc...
[Modified by kewlbrz, 11:31 AM 6/10/2002]
http://www.idavette.net/hib/ls6/page3.htm
Also I don't think many people are going to put a roll cage into a C5 coupe!
:) :) :)


I think you need to do a little reading:
http://www.idavette.net/hib/ls6/page3.htm
Also I don't think many people are going to put a roll cage into a C5 coupe!
:) :) :)
Also I still contend that the LS1 block is fine for durability for the power levels we are seeing now. To me the LS6 needed most of its strengtening update to overcome the window cutouts, which the LS1 doesnt have.
Also I said rollbar not rollcage. Plus there are removable options, at least in a ragtop.
:cheers:
[Modified by kewlbrz, 11:50 AM 6/10/2002]
I think you need to do a little reading:
http://www.idavette.net/hib/ls6/page3.htm
Also I don't think many people are going to put a roll cage into a C5 coupe!
:) :) :)
Hib's article is referring to the 01 comparisons. I was referring to late 01 and 02 with regard to the blocks being the same.
Also I still contend that the LS1 block is fine for durability for the power levels we are seeing now. To me the LS6 needed most of its strengtening update to overcome the window cutouts, which the LS1 doesnt have.
Also I said rollbar not rollcage. Plus there are removable options, at least in a ragtop.
:cheers:
[Modified by kewlbrz, 11:50 AM 6/10/2002]
If what you say is true about the windows then they wouldn't have bothered with all the other cahnges like pistions, bearing e.t.c.
Finally a rollbar is a real pain for everyday driving and may not even equal the rigidity of the Z06...
Second, I think that if you are defending your car because of what you think it is and what it actually is, then the rigidity is only in your brain. Go back and read how much the FRC "Hardtop" was in comparison to the coupe back in 1999. You might learn some thing factual. It was supposed to be lighter, stiffer, faster, and cheaper. But ended up being the same through the cones. So I guess it would come down to the driver. I made up for any rigidity issues in my car with T1 suspension. I think that solves it. And once again why are C5R's in Coupe config if there is such a structural difference. I say that a little loosely because the C5R chassis is completely different, but I have yet to see a Hardtop C5R.
All C5's to me are beautiful be it Coupe, FRC, or Vert. The question here was how to make a Coupe, Vert, FRC comparable to a Z06. With the exception of the M12 it is not that difficult.
The LS6 is an LS1 with some windows cut into the block to relieve crankcase pressure. Crankcase pressure causes a decrease in TQ. I don't think there is much of a difference to determine longevity out of that. The main difference in the LS6 is the heads and that is easily remedied.
Second, I think that if you are defending your car because of what you think it is and what it actually is, then the rigidity is only in your brain. Go back and read how much the FRC "Hardtop" was in comparison to the coupe back in 1999. You might learn some thing factual. It was supposed to be lighter, stiffer, faster, and cheaper. But ended up being the same through the cones. So I guess it would come down to the driver. I made up for any rigidity issues in my car with T1 suspension. I think that solves it. And once again why are C5R's in Coupe config if there is such a structural difference. I say that a little loosely because the C5R chassis is completely different, but I have yet to see a Hardtop C5R.
All C5's to me are beautiful be it Coupe, FRC, or Vert. The question here was how to make a Coupe, Vert, FRC comparable to a Z06. With the exception of the M12 it is not that difficult.
The LS6 is an LS1 with some windows cut into the block to relieve crankcase pressure. Crankcase pressure causes a decrease in TQ. I don't think there is much of a difference to determine longevity out of that. The main difference in the LS6 is the heads and that is easily remedied.
I'm not going to take offense to your post and just put it down to lack of research... This will be my last post here but I suggest you do a little more reading...


If what you say is true about the windows then they wouldn't have bothered with all the other cahnges like pistions, bearing e.t.c.
Finally a rollbar is a real pain for everyday driving and may not even equal the rigidity of the Z06...
so there you have it.
thanks Paul if you read this.
:cheers:
If what you say is true about the windows then they wouldn't have bothered with all the other cahnges like pistions, bearing e.t.c.
Finally a rollbar is a real pain for everyday driving and may not even equal the rigidity of the Z06...
I spoke to C4C5specialist and confirmed what I had understood, and he said he has torn down 01+ "LS1" engines and has seen the bay to bay windows and said the blocks are identical. Pistons are the same, crank is the same, rods are the same.
so there you have it.
thanks Paul if you read this.
:cheers:
[Modified by Richin Chicago, 7:00 PM 6/10/2002]


The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
No because the LS6 heads have a smaller chamber.


No because the LS6 heads have a smaller chamber.
Then the displacement would be different??? :confused: :confused:
Displacement only uses the cylindrical volume of the bore and stroke.
a simple method: Bore^2 * Stroke * #cylinders * .7854
Or your could do pi(r^2)h * #cylinders
[Modified by kewlbrz, 7:08 PM 6/10/2002]
No because the LS6 heads have a smaller chamber.
Then the displacement would be different??? :confused: :confused:
Displacement has never used combustion chamber size in the calculations.
Displacement only uses the cylindrical volume of the bore and stroke.
a simple method: Bore^2 * Stroke * #cylinders * .7854
If what you say is true about the windows then they wouldn't have bothered with all the other cahnges like pistions, bearing e.t.c.
Finally a rollbar is a real pain for everyday driving and may not even equal the rigidity of the Z06...
I spoke to C4C5specialist and confirmed what I had understood, and he said he has torn down 01+ "LS1" engines and has seen the bay to bay windows and said the blocks are identical. Pistons are the same, crank is the same, rods are the same. Everything is identical except for heads, cam, and ti exhaust, high flow cats for 02, no maf screen for 02, and calibration. Only thing he is unsure of is when the exact cutover of using the same block took place.
so there you have it.
thanks Paul if you read this.
:cheers:
I don't think GM agrees with you... http://www.chevrolet.com/corvette/en...ls6_engine.htm


I think that you could look at that from different perspectives. Are they saying the changes are different from the existing production LS1 or are they simply referring to changes they made from previous LS1's, and are just not marketing the fact that the current LS1 shares much of the same components. GM is notorious for not marketing many changes. For example, in 99 there were a ton of changes made to the LS1, they were not marketed. This is also why we see 99-00 LS1's consistantly out dynoing 97--98 LS1's stock for stock. There are not two seperate part numbers for the existing blocks. Based on hands on experience from folks like c4c5specialist where they have physically dissasmbled the motors and see that the blocks and other parts are exactly the same is enough proof for me. I'll take that over GM marketing mumbo jumbo anyday.
Also I wanted to add, here is a GM press release regarding the exhaust manifolds:
"Engineering development of the Z06 package resulted in several improvements for coupe and convertible models as well. LS1 engines get the same new intake and exhaust manifolds as the LS6"
This shows more of the contradiction and confusion spewing from GM marketing when comparing to thier statement that the LS6 has cast manifolds different from the LS1 stamped steel. Again, I beleive they are simply referring to 97-00 LS1's, and just arnt marketing the fact that since late 2001 that all motors short block assemblies are bascially identical except for cam. They would definatly take away from the marketing hype of the LS6/Z06, and they dont want to do that.
[Modified by kewlbrz, 1:27 PM 6/15/2002]
You can mod a C-5 to '01 Z06 HP specs pretty easily (02 is a great deal tougher) for under $2500 in exhaust and intake-but will be at the absolute limit before heads and cam.
You can tire it and weight redux (I believe my FLP complete system and Z06 cat back muffs should save me close to 50 lbs), and non-runflat tires save a couple of more pounds per tire. You should be able to come w/i 60lbs of a Z06.
Ultimately you will probably get to 90-95% of an '02's total performance. But ask yourself where and when you will achieve this advantage, as oppossed to the removable top, greater storage area-and top speed.
I lamented, and chose the coupe-but wish I had the LS6 under the hood-but trying so damn hard to close the gap with mods!!
Has some really good info about the 2002 Z06 and what has changed.













