Lowering rear
Instructor
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 205
Likes: 8
Team Owner
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 87,294
Likes: 1,579
From: Western NY
This is true. Secondly, in order to be "aero stable", a C-5 needs the rear to be a tad higher than the front. This allows the air to push down on the hood, providing downforce, rather than tipping the nose up, and building air pressure under the nose of the car.
Racer
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: MN
The only thing that affects the traction control system are tire sizes. The reason is that the computer's calculations are based off the rotation speed relations between the rear and front, and when they are not a certain amount between each other, the required amount of difference throws the calculations off, hence why the computer will throw codes and "complain".
Thread Starter
Intermediate
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
lowering rear
The only thing that affects the traction control system are tire sizes. The reason is that the computer's calculations are based off the rotation speed relations between the rear and front, and when they are not a certain amount between each other, the required amount of difference throws the calculations off, hence why the computer will throw codes and "complain".
Racer
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: MN
ABS/Traction/Active Handling all runs on the same module. However, tire sizes only affect the syncing for the traction control. ABS and I think Active Handling work the same with correct size differences or not.
