Pipes vs mufflers
Thread Starter
Intermediate
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: new york n.y.
Pipes vs mufflers
Sorry for bringing up an old question but there are some new guys on the block. { exhaust sytems}
Although I leaning towards the GHL setup would like to hear more of the stinger system and comments or in put on the difference between either of these and the prt tri flos and or the slp system without the restricted baffles.
Like I mentioned before I would like a 60's type sound at idle where I can hear the the uneven lift of the future cam to be installed. Also an ATprocharger might find it way into my engine compartment once the waranty is up.
The vette is a 2002 con't 6 speed
Thanks
Blue :rolleyes: :cheers:
Although I leaning towards the GHL setup would like to hear more of the stinger system and comments or in put on the difference between either of these and the prt tri flos and or the slp system without the restricted baffles.
Like I mentioned before I would like a 60's type sound at idle where I can hear the the uneven lift of the future cam to be installed. Also an ATprocharger might find it way into my engine compartment once the waranty is up.
The vette is a 2002 con't 6 speed
Thanks
Blue :rolleyes: :cheers:
Burning Brakes
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 767
Likes: 1
From: Noble OK
Re: Pipes vs mufflers (inblue2002)
Borla Stingers the way to go, especially on a 6 speed car according to other forum members. I don't now anyone that likes the Loudmouths by SLP, people equate them to running open pipes. I have not heard the GHL system so my opinion is a little biased! Love those Stingers! :reddevil
