When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
We had a C5 Z06 in the other day to get the old LS6 stock clutch out, and get a new LT1-S with a standard weight flywheel. Here is the dyno results, the only difference between the dyno runs was the clutch swap. It gained 15/RWHP and 13/RWTQ!! Not bad for just a clutch swap, that also drives like stock and can take 700WHP/TQ. Sorry for the poor quality of the photo, its the best that I can get right now.
Is the LT1-S a single or dual disc clutch? Do you have more info on the kit? I'm at my wits end with this Spec twin, and I'm looking for something more driver friendly.
Is the LT1-S a single or dual disc clutch? Do you have more info on the kit? I'm at my wits end with this Spec twin, and I'm looking for something more driver friendly.
Sorry guys, clutches don't add power. Either the ambients were different run to run or something else changed.
Anytime you reduce the rotating mass of an engine you will increase power. That said, anytime you do that on larger parts, IE the clutch, you will gain power on a larger scale.
To say what you did is to admit a lack of understanding of how physics applies to this.
Think of this in the same way you would an underdrive pulley... those pick up power as well, why? Reduced load on the engine = added power.
Anytime you reduce the rotating mass of an engine you will increase power. That said, anytime you do that on larger parts, IE the clutch, you will gain power on a larger scale.
To say what you did is to admit a lack of understanding of how physics applies to this.
Think of this in the same way you would an underdrive pulley... those pick up power as well, why? Reduced load on the engine = added power.
They pick up power just the same as smaller wheels!
The flywheel is easily the heaviest part of this equation and if standard weight = same weight as stock LS6 flywheel I do not see the clutch disc and pressure plate weighing less enough to make this type of difference in rwhp. Clutch slippage perhaps, if the old one was worn, but the difference would not be seen like this across the power band. Were the runs done on the same day on the same dyno?
The flywheel is easily the heaviest part of this equation and if standard weight = same weight as stock LS6 flywheel I do not see the clutch disc and pressure plate weighing less enough to make this type of difference in rwhp. Clutch slippage perhaps, if the old one was worn, but the difference would not be seen like this across the power band. Were the runs done on the same day on the same dyno?
Anytime you reduce the rotating mass of an engine you will increase power. That said, anytime you do that on larger parts, IE the clutch, you will gain power on a larger scale.
To say what you did is to admit a lack of understanding of how physics applies to this.
Think of this in the same way you would an underdrive pulley... those pick up power as well, why? Reduced load on the engine = added power.
My old physics professors would disagree with you. The only time you get a beneficial effect from having a lower rotating mass is during periods of very rapid engine rpm acceleration - not steady state.
And it is nothing like using an underdrive pulley to reduce parasitic losses caused by the various driven accessories as they draw more power the faster they are spun. Even then, we are only talking a couple horsepower.
My old physics professors would disagree with you. The only time you get a beneficial effect from having a lower rotating mass is during periods of very rapid engine rpm acceleration - not steady state.
And it is nothing like using an underdrive pulley to reduce parasitic losses caused by the various driven accessories as they draw more power the faster they are spun. Even then, we are only talking a couple horsepower.
What do you think a 1/4 mile pass or road racing is? It's all acceleration being produced by the engine. The dyno is measuring power at the wheels. In between the wheels and the engine is a heavy a$$ clutch and flywheel that takes a certain amount of power to accelerate. If you reduce that weight you increase acceleration to the wheels. Horsepower is a product of torque and acceleration (rpm gain). If you increase either, HP goes up. The lighter clutch isn't giving the engine more power, it's giving the wheels more power as an end result, which is what matters in the real world. Our nascar modified motor uses a 5.5 inch clutch that as a whole weights 12lbs. It definitely makes the car faster than a heavy setup because it allows the transfer of power to wheels more efficiently, which would show more power on a chassis dyno, just as this monster twin disk did.
No it can only be used with our custom flywheel and stands.
Originally Posted by Mike94ZLT1
The flywheel is easily the heaviest part of this equation and if standard weight = same weight as stock LS6 flywheel I do not see the clutch disc and pressure plate weighing less enough to make this type of difference in rwhp. Clutch slippage perhaps, if the old one was worn, but the difference would not be seen like this across the power band. Were the runs done on the same day on the same dyno?
We like to post these results to help demonstrate the difference MOI (moment of inertia) makes vs the overall weight of a clutch (which is what a lot of people dwell on). The overall weight of this particular clutch, is close to that of the stock LS6, however, the MOI is dramatically lower on the LT1-S by design. The stock unit is 12" and the LT1-S is 9.5", because of that reduced diameter the MOI is lessened which in turn reduces the amount of energy needed to spin the engine. This is why there is an increase in power even though the clutches weigh pretty much the same.
Originally Posted by 455230
...Looks like dyno trickery to me....
That old trickery of Physics....Lol
Originally Posted by jackthelad
My old physics professors would disagree with you. The only time you get a beneficial effect from having a lower rotating mass is during periods of very rapid engine rpm acceleration - not steady state.
And it is nothing like using an underdrive pulley to reduce parasitic losses caused by the various driven accessories as they draw more power the faster they are spun. Even then, we are only talking a couple horsepower.
Would you agree that the weight of the clutch assembly is a parasitic loss?
Originally Posted by 95Z28M6
What do you think a 1/4 mile pass or road racing is? It's all acceleration being produced by the engine. The dyno is measuring power at the wheels. In between the wheels and the engine is a heavy a$$ clutch and flywheel that takes a certain amount of power to accelerate. If you reduce that weight you increase acceleration to the wheels. Horsepower is a product of torque and acceleration (rpm gain). If you increase either, HP goes up. The lighter clutch isn't giving the engine more power, it's giving the wheels more power as an end result, which is what matters in the real world. Our nascar modified motor uses a 5.5 inch clutch that as a whole weights 12lbs. It definitely makes the car faster than a heavy setup because it allows the transfer of power to wheels more efficiently, which would show more power on a chassis dyno, just as this monster twin disk did.
Exactly my point. At least someone here has the basic understanding of what we're trying to portray.
Interesting results. Thanks for doing a back to back test and posting real numbers.
An interesting result of lowering the clutch MOI is that the increase in power to wheels will vary based on the acceleration rate of the engine. In other words, you will gain more in a lower gear compared to a higher gear.