When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Dumb question of the day Drive Ratio?? 3.42 Gears?
Help please,
I keep getting told that my 99 HRDTOP (6 speed) has a drive ratio of 3.42. However a auto C4 can take it off the line. I was also told that after a 100mph then I would pull ahead.
If both drivers have the same skill is this true, and what does teh drive ratio or gear ratio really mean?
Re: Dumb question of the day Drive Ratio?? 3.42 Gears? (White Star)
An auto c5 will NOT take it off the line, unless it has the OPTIONAL 3.15 axle or other aftermarket parts. Event the 3.15 would have a hard time with a 6 speed. The 3.42 refers to the number of times the tranny output shaft has to turn, for the rear end gears to turn the rear tire once. The higher the number the more the tq multipliction. Your car will stomp an A4 with 2.73s :yesnod: (you might want to stay away from A4's with TCs and/or gears though ;) )
Re: Dumb question of the day Drive Ratio?? 3.42 Gears? (rrobert22)
An auto c5 will NOT take it off the line, unless it has the OPTIONAL 3.15 axle or other aftermarket parts. Event the 3.15 would have a hard time with a 6 speed. The 3.42 refers to the number of times the tranny output shaft has to turn, for the rear end gears to turn the rear tire once. The higher the number the more the tq multipliction. Your car will stomp an A4 with 2.73s :yesnod: (you might want to stay away from A4's with TCs and/or gears though ;) )
Thanks for the scoop. However, it seems like the higher teh number the worse it is because it takes more revolutions to turn the tires. instead of a higher number. My friends auto was also a C4 Vette that was an auto. He said that a C5 stick could not beat it. From what you said I think that I could take him even off the line.
Re: Dumb question of the day Drive Ratio?? 3.42 Gears? (rrobert22)
Your car will stomp an A4 with 2.73s :yesnod:
I tend to disgree with that...with only a K&N air filter and modified airbox I was pulling 13.0 to 13.1 @ 106 on runflats with a 1.94 best 60 foot. If you don't believe it I have the timeslips to prove it. I have 2.73s and have beaten my share of manual cars heads up (with similar mods of course). Remember, while everyone else is sitting there spinning my car is moving.
Re: Dumb question of the day Drive Ratio?? 3.42 Gears? (rrobert22)
Just curious but how do i get off that line as fast as i can with the 6 speed. I dont know how hard or how fast i should have the motor when i let the clutch out. Curious about how to do this best.
Re: Dumb question of the day Drive Ratio?? 3.42 Gears? (NJVetteGuy)
With identical HP numbers, a stick Vette will always beat an automatic Vette if....IF the driver of the stick is well coordinated and experienced.
But that is why the A4 can beat a MN6 to the 60ft mark, because its much more difficult to get a good launch using a manual clutch than an automatic. Ir-regardless; even with a bad launch, the 6 speed manual will probably win because it has better gearings keeping the engine up into its peak torque/HP rpm.
Re: Dumb question of the day Drive Ratio?? 3.42 Gears? (Mike Mercury)
Well I believe torque multiplication is higher in the automatic with 3.15 diff. I think the automatic has a steeper first gear than the six speed. Even with the 3.42 gears the six speed still has a higher overall drive ratio in first. Of-course this is counterbalanced by the increased driveline losses in the automatic -- which is again counterbalanced by how easy and consistant it is off the line.
Re: Dumb question of the day Drive Ratio?? 3.42 Gears? (1g1yy)
Well I believe torque multiplication is higher in the automatic with 3.15 diff. I think the automatic has a steeper first gear than the six speed. Even with the 3.42 gears the six speed still has a higher overall drive ratio in first. Of-course this is counterbalanced by the increased driveline losses in the automatic -- which is again counterbalanced by how easy and consistant it is off the line.
[Modified by 1g1yy, 10:26 PM 8/26/2002]
Which is again counter balanced by the six speeds second third and fourth gears which are all closer together to keep the car in its powerband. I have owned both, and the six speed is faster stock. Who does everyone doubt this. I didnt doubt it when I had an auto, its just a fact. And yes a poor driver in a six speed throws everything off.
Re: Dumb question of the day Drive Ratio?? 3.42 Gears? (rrobert22)
Which is again counter balanced by the six speeds second third and fourth gears which are all closer together to keep the car in its powerband. I have owned both, and the six speed is faster stock.
Yes, and the math is there to prove this. But, factor in the human driver... and that's where a no-brainer automatic can sometimes win over someone that is not born with natural talent to shift a manual transmission.
For example... look at my time ticket below; my first time ever at the track.. the first time the car was ever there... and my first run:
I am on the left driving a 2002 Coupe. The guy on the right is driving a 2002 Z06 with racing slicks. A stock Z06 on run-flats should be in the mid 12's... but with this particular driver it didn't happen... even with upgraded tires.
I talked with the guy after the run and he said he didn't get a good launch.
I was ahead of him at the 60' and the 330'.
With a manual shift... soooooo much depends on the driver. :yesnod:
Re: Dumb question of the day Drive Ratio?? 3.42 Gears? (Mike Mercury)
Take this :D :jester From the corvette museum site
" The "slowest" Corvette - equipped with an automatic transmission and the standard rear axle ratio - now accelerates from 0-60 a full quarter second faster. When equipped with the performance axle, the automatic is as quick as last year's manual gearbox"
:cheers:
Re: Dumb question of the day Drive Ratio?? 3.42 Gears? (Mike Mercury)
Noone said the A4 was faster overall -- I was responding to what was said about the 60' times. It's not just about the driver, the A4 ( with 3.15 gears ) has a very low overall first gear ratio. In fact, in 1970 a friend had a '69 Z-28 with a 4-speed and 4.10 gears. A C5 A4 with 3.15 gears has a lower overall first gear ratio and could very easily have taken him. ( Of-course the C5 weighing about 200 lbs. less and having 40+ more fuel-injected cubes than the Z should easily take the win even with like gearing! ).
I believe the reason the M6 is faster overall than the A4 has as much to do with parasitic losses as it has to do with being able to keep it in it's "powerband". Having lots of gears is more important in cars with peaky engines ( like the Honda S-2000 ) than in cars with a wide torque band. Part of the advantage of keeping the engine in it's "powerband" is lost in the time spent shifting lots of gears.
Re: Dumb question of the day Drive Ratio?? 3.42 Gears? (1g1yy)
Having lots of gears is more important in cars with peaky engines ( like the Honda S-2000 ) than in cars with a wide torque band. Part of the advantage of keeping the engine in it's "powerband" is lost in the time spent shifting lots of gears.
Re: Dumb question of the day Drive Ratio?? 3.42 Gears? (Mike Mercury)
With low 13 second ET's, I think the C5 is right on the edge of the balance between the advantages of close ratios and the disadvantage of the time it takes to shift gears. If drag racing was my thing, I would definitely opt for an A4. Because I use my car for spirited pleasure driving (lots of four wheel drifts, fish tails and not-so-subtle reminders from the rev limiter), I love my M6. I do want to put a set of 4.10's in, though!!