When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The last car I had without assisted steering was an 85 RX-7, and it weighed 2465 pounds. That car actually had lighter steering when on the highway than my 89 Z51 Corvette. In order to get steering boost in the Corvette you had to put in more force and to do the small corrections at speed, the Corvette with assist was actually heavier than the unassisted steering in the RX-7.
That said, the manual steering RX-7 was slower than the power assisted version, and a lot slower than the steering in the Corvette and in order to park the car you had to be moving a bit to steer it, but so long as you kept it moving and weren't just trying to scrub the rubber was fine, but it took some muscle to do it.
I autocrossed the car extensively and one year after the winter layoff I took the car out for my first event in the spring and pulled the muscles in my chest trying to steer through fast tight course. Every year after that, before I raced the car I'd do some serious exercises to get my strength up before I hit the track.
The other thing that would make it interesting is that the Corvette has zero scrub radius, which would help make the steering lighter (and have less kickback) so you may be able to get away with it, but I would think that you would need to slow down the steering to get it to work.
To give you an example of how slow the steering was on the RX-7 we had a fast slalom on an autocross course and to get through it I had to put in about 270 degrees of steering angle in each direction. I had my hands at 3 and 9 and to go in one direction I put in hand at 9 all the way around to 6 o'clock and then as I unwound the wheel, I picked up the 3 o'clock position and spun that 270 degrees down to the 6 o'clock position... Basically I was putting in about 540 degrees of steering in about a second...
A vehicle dynamics engineer that worked at Milford and was doing all of their "expert witness" testimony. in court rode with me on one run and he got out of the car laughing.. He said "you've just screwed up all of our all of our theories on how fast steering lock can be applied and now I'm going to have to go to work on Monday and tell the lawyers nothing we've been saying is right!"
In a C5 the amount of steering lock for the same maneuver is going to be probably about half that of the RX-7 and the RX7 weighed 500 pounds less than the Corvette. Bottom line is that if you wanted to put manual steering in C5 you would have to slow it down or you'd need to be Jack Armstrong to steer the car.
C3's had power steering as an option an it was a "bolt on" assist system. Those cars typically weighed around 3200 pounds and a good number of those cars were delivered without power steering, but those cars had much skinnier rubber, had slower steering and had steering offset so you could move the steering wheel with the car not moving.
Last edited by Solofast; May 13, 2016 at 11:48 PM.
From: Dear Karma, I have a list of people you missed.
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16
Originally Posted by Solofast
The last car I had without assisted steering was an 85 RX-7, and it weighed 2465 pounds. That car actually had lighter steering when on the highway than my 89 Z51 Corvette. In order to get steering boost in the Corvette you had to put in more force and to do the small corrections at speed, the Corvette with assist was actually heavier than the unassisted steering in the RX-7.
That said, the manual steering RX-7 was slower than the power assisted version, and a lot slower than the steering in the Corvette and in order to park the car you had to be moving a bit to steer it, but so long as you kept it moving and weren't just trying to scrub the rubber was fine, but it took some muscle to do it.
I autocrossed the car extensively and one year after the winter layoff I took the car out for my first event in the spring and pulled the muscles in my chest trying to steer through fast tight course. Every year after that, before I raced the car I'd do some serious exercises to get my strength up before I hit the track.
The other thing that would make it interesting is that the Corvette has zero scrub radius, which would help make the steering lighter (and have less kickback) so you may be able to get away with it, but I would think that you would need to slow down the steering to get it to work.
To give you an example of how slow the steering was on the RX-7 we had a fast slalom on an autocross course and to get through it I had to put in about 270 degrees of steering angle in each direction. I had my hands at 3 and 9 and to go in one direction I put in hand at 9 all the way around to 6 o'clock and then as I unwound the wheel, I picked up the 3 o'clock position and spun that 270 degrees down to the 6 o'clock position... Basically I was putting in about 540 degrees of steering in about a second...
A vehicle dynamics engineer that worked at Milford and was doing all of their "expert witness" testimony. in court rode with me on one run and he got out of the car laughing.. He said "you've just screwed up all of our all of our theories on how fast steering lock can be applied and now I'm going to have to go to work on Monday and tell the lawyers nothing we've been saying is right!"
In a C5 the amount of steering lock for the same maneuver is going to be probably about half that of the RX-7 and the RX7 weighed 500 pounds less than the Corvette. Bottom line is that if you wanted to put manual steering in C5 you would have to slow it down or you'd need to be Jack Armstrong to steer the car.
C3's had power steering as an option an it was a "bolt on" assist system. Those cars typically weighed around 3200 pounds and a good number of those cars were delivered without power steering, but those cars had much skinnier rubber, had slower steering and had steering offset so you could move the steering wheel with the car not moving.
To say nothing of the obvious effects of steering wheel diameter vs amount of force needed to move wheels. SWs have gotten progressively smaller in diameter over the years.
To say nothing of the obvious effects of steering wheel diameter vs amount of force needed to move wheels. SWs have gotten progressively smaller in diameter over the years.
Yup, all true. I had an aftermarket steering wheel on the RX-7 for a while, it made the steering effort that much higher. I eventually got rid of it as tires got better and steering effort got so high that it became difficult to place the car in fast maneuvers.
The RX-7 had a front axle weight of 1350 lbs. If you had a light Corvette (3000 lbs) and a true 50/50 weight distribution you wouldn't be that far (only 150 lbs more) or about 10% more weight on the front axle.
If you could get some weight off the front axle, put in a slower steering rack you could make it work, but it's going to take some heft to steer it for parking. With the low scrub radius of today's cars it might be pretty easy to steer and wouldn't have much kickback on the highway.
I'm thinking of doing this aswell, what did you end up doing with the pump?
Removed p/s, removed a/c, relocated alternator to the a/c position. Added an electric water pump so no primary belt, just the 4 rib a/c belt driving the alternator.
Removed p/s, removed a/c, relocated alternator to the a/c position. Added an electric water pump so no primary belt, just the 4 rib a/c belt driving the alternator.
Interesting, is there a bracket available to move the alternator, or did you make one? My ac is already gone and I have the ati balancer that has no ac pulley, wonder how I'd make that work.
Interesting, is there a bracket available to move the alternator, or did you make one? My ac is already gone and I have the ati balancer that has no ac pulley, wonder how I'd make that work.
ECS makes an alternator relo kit. You have to call them to ask about it. I went a different route when I learned that a Ford alternator bolts up to the a/c bracket. I had to get a wiring harness and adapt pins to make it work. Here's what it looks like. I'm doing this to make room for top mount turbos.
Last edited by Chris Stewart; May 14, 2016 at 05:51 PM.
Looks great, Chris. You're going to have to do a write up thread about it with part numbers and wiring diagrams though.
OP, my car is a track only car, so it might not be relevant, but all the lines to my rack have been removed and left open. The pump is gone too.
It works fine in the pits and such.
Looks great, Chris. You're going to have to do a write up thread about it with part numbers and wiring diagrams though.
OP, my car is a track only car, so it might not be relevant, but all the lines to my rack have been removed and left open. The pump is gone too.
It works fine in the pits and such.
Thanks!
Chris at ECS hooked me up with a guy that makes a neat kit for $1500.