When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
According to Howards, their ASA is a reproduction of the GM ASA but held to tighter specs. It's known the that GM ASA is very easy on parts and was designed to run all day long at high RPM.
WS6 Store's ASA has significantly more (0.075") lift yet they somehow claim their rams are gentler than the GM ASA. I don't understand how a 0.600" lift cam (duration held the same) can be as gentle as a 0.525" lift cam. If the 0.600" lift cam is going to have the same "open area" as the 0.525" lift cam, the ramps on the 0.600" lift would need to be faster.
Lift isn't everything in determining how hard a lobe is on parts, the lobe profile and ramp rates on the opening and closing of the determines how the valves react. You can have less overall lift but a harsher/quicker opening and/or closing and thus a cam that is harder on parts
I have no experience with the Howards or WS6 store ASA cam.
Lift isn't everything in determining how hard a lobe is on parts, the lobe profile and ramp rates on the opening and closing of the determines how the valves react. You can have less overall lift but a harsher/quicker opening and/or closing and thus a cam that is harder on parts.
The lobe profile is a product of change in lift over degrees of rotation. If two cams with identical duration numbers have different lift values, then the ramps will be different (and either more/less time at max lift).
WS6 Store called me back and explained their cam. It turns out that while both their ASA cam and the GM/Howards ASA have the same 0.050" duration, their "advertised" (ex: 0.006") duration is different. WS6 Store has more "advertised" duration (which they don't list on their website) which is why the ramp rate is milder (slower transition from 0.006" to 0.050" lift value). I would assume that this same ramp then continues on through the full lift value, which makes me wonder if the time at max lift is shorter (should have asked that).
Lobe designs are not symmetrical in majority of today's cams allowing for greater variation within the published numbers further their is the initial lift off the seat, gradual switch from lift to close and the closing landing. Plenty of place to alter design between .050 and .050. Loads and loads of R&D time in modern cam technology. In some classes where "lift" is limited the cam designer will intentionally loft the valve playing with that transition from opening to closing the valve, just an extreme example of where advertised # don't tell the entire picture.
That's a pretty old cam design. I don't think it's been popular for years. Lots of reviews if tough to tune too. I don't have any personal experience but there are plenty of threads/reviews.