When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Hi,
I am new to the forum as well as new to C5. I just noticed that my Oil Pressure Gauge is pegged to 80 PSI. I know this is a sign of bad Oil Pressure Sensor and needs to be replaced. I have seen many way to do this and will have to do it soon. However, is it OK to drive with the Oil Pressure gauge pegged to 80 PSI? Should I stop driving the car until I fix the sensor? Thank you.
If the engine is healthy, it's not too big of a deal to drive it for a while, Just understand, you have no visibility if a problem arises. It's a calculated risk, but not a huge one in my opinion.
I watched the Video in youtube and it seems fairly easy if you can access the area. I have read many discussion between removing the intake, making a hole in the cowl and just simply replacing it. I am going to try to replace it without removing the intake and without making a hole. If I cannot, then my second option is to make the hole in the cowl. Wish me luck!!! If you have any hints or useful tips, please let me know... I even saw on youtube a guy bending some cloth hanger to unplug the wire harness...
I replaced mine last summer without removing intake. Hardest part for me was to start the threading of the new sending unit. I used a section of clear flexible hose that fit over the unit. After several attempts, I was able to thread it on and tightened with a ratchet with (2) U-Joints in the extension set-up. A long needle nose pliers (11") with a 45 degree angled tips will be needed to pull/place on the electrical connection plug. Took me about 30 minutes total.
Thank you all for the replies. Just curious, what is the main reason people don't want to cut a rectangular hole on the cowl and perhaps design a waterproof seal door? This will allow to access the oil pressure sending unit at anytime it fail. This seems to be the quickest and painless way to replace it. Unless, if you make the hole you are compromising the structural frame of the windshield, chassis, etc...
Thank you all for the replies. Just curious, what is the main reason people don't want to cut a rectangular hole on the cowl and perhaps design a waterproof seal door? This will allow to access the oil pressure sending unit at anytime it fail. This seems to be the quickest and painless way to replace it. Unless, if you make the hole you are compromising the structural frame of the windshield, chassis, etc...
Andrew, that’s the way I did it. I bought the socket, universal joint, followed all the instructions but I just couldn’t do it. I used a hole saw to cut a clean shape and then made an aluminum ‘door’ which I screwed and siliconed in place. If it ever goes, I’ll do it again, just easier.
Thank you all for the replies. Just curious, what is the main reason people don't want to cut a rectangular hole on the cowl and perhaps design a waterproof seal door? This will allow to access the oil pressure sending unit at anytime it fail. This seems to be the quickest and painless way to replace it. Unless, if you make the hole you are compromising the structural frame of the windshield, chassis, etc...
just my opinion, but cutting the cowl is just a lazy person option and I doubt it really saves all that much time. Remove the intake, once and install an oil sender relocation kit. This way it takes 2 mins to change them in the future...
I am SO weary of people stating that cutting the cowl is a ‘lazy person’s solution’. I don’t see opening the upper area of the engine so something can fall inside as the best way to do something if you are not familiar with it. I’m NO rookie either. As I stated before, I bought every tool required and could not get them to work nor could I get any view of what I was working with at the same time as getting the socket over the sensor. The oil sender relocation kit makes sense to me, however.
In my opinion the less disassembly to a machine, in this case our LS1, to accomplish a repair the less chance of problems. Having worked on electro-mechanical devices for 40 years this has served me well. I have used the cowl cut and have had no water leaks. The plastic cowl doesn’t appear to be a structural member. There are many ways to waterproof the piece removed. By working directly above the sender I felt confident in not cross-threading the new sender. With just one connector to disturb made sense to me. My 2 cents.
the most important thing is to accurately locate the sensor. Remove the plastic trim piece after first removing the wiper arms. There’s now way that plastic is structural. I used a 3” hole saw and was very close. I attached it to my new aluminum sheet cover piece so I could mold it to the surrounding contours as close as possible. I didn’t want to invite leaks. Measure 3x, cut once!
If you have an early C5 there is all sorts of crap in the way of getting to the sensor, so all this "doing it without removing anything" on Youtube is pure BS. I cut through the plenum so I could get a clear view of the sensor, and then it was very easy to get the needle nose pliers in to remove the electrical connections - which were very firmly attached - no way I could have removed them with my fingers. Having changed it, I "glassed" the fiberglass I removed back into place - no sign of what I did.
I don't understand why this approach is any kind of issue. It's a simple way to solve the problem.
My 99 vert needs the Oil Pressure Sender changed and my AC is blowing through all places. I think my vacuum line behind the intake is cracked, going by what I have read.
There is no way I can get back there to do both of these things with the intake process n place.
If I can cut a big enough section of the wiper under-panel out, I may be able to deal with the vacuum line, but I will go ahead and bond with my car and pull the manifold/relocate.