Comparing Engine Mounts
I'm getting ready for a pretty major project on my C5 - I'm assessing different engine mounts and would like some opinions.
This, like most cars here, will be a quick street build, seeing occasional auto-x or HPDE.
I have come to a few basic types of engine mounts:
OEM: Basically two studs with an oil filled bladder in the middle. Great for absorbing vibrations, not very durable or consistent over time.
The AFE Style thru-bolt mount
Two piece system with saddles and a thru-bolt, sorta like a sway bar link.
The AMT/Hinson design
A bushing captured between two "cups".
The LG Motorsports - true solid style
A hunk of metal with no bushing and a stud on each end.
I am wondering what folks like, and why? What are the benefits or drawbacks of each style?
To me the cup design seems the best option as it still provides some vibration isolation, without play. The AFE mount seems like over time the thru-bolt bushing will fail. The true solid style seems like a bad idea for anything that sees street use - also making a solid trans bushing a requirement to avoid loading up the transmission.
BUT - all of these assumptions are not based on any actual experience with C5's; just other cars and general engineering proto-knowledge.
Last edited by Lowend; Nov 28, 2025 at 11:26 AM. Reason: trying to resize the images
My first set fell apart after a number of years because of heat.
I bought another set and used shields this time.
They seem to work fine.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
You will get more NVH so be prepared. Interior panel rattles, side mirror rattles. At least my old C5Z with a cam had those vibrations with AMT mounts (or any delrin/solid style mount). I ended up going back to stock since I did not feel any benefit worth putting up with the NVH.

















