When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
my RPO code list says I have the GU6 (3.42 axle ratio) with a MM6, MN6
I see a lot of mods for changing gears. Why are folks changing gears? Is it mainly for drag racing applications?
I see the other choices for gears are the GU2 (2.73), G90 (3.15), and the G92 (performance ratio).
My understanding of basic gearing is that a 4.10 will get you to redline quicker but won't allow as much top speed
What is the scope on gearing for the C5?
My application is mostly road racing. Even though I've got about 400 rwhp, it just seems real lazy until about 4k rpm's (could be partially my cam selection also).
Maybe I've grown too used to 400 rwhp but it seems like the car should be faster, so i'm wanting to learn more about gearing.
You just need to go to a stage II H/C setup, your gear is just fine, you wouldn't want a 3:73 or 4:10 on a circle track, it's drag strip only and you'd lose your top end,and 2:73 or 3:15 would make your problem worse, since you said it doesn't get up and go til about 4000 rpm, you can't even spin a 2:73 gear. You've got the hp, you just need to get the rpm's to jump up and fall back down faster so you can shift quicker. Reading your mod list you've got the intake and exhausts covered, it looks like your heads are the culprit. You might want to upgrade to a St II H/C setup with possibly some larger valves. I think your heads are choking it.
An engine produces TQ, TQ gets multiplied by the transmission, and then gets multiplied (again) by the differential. The rear axel TQ is then divided by the rolling radius of the rear tire to arrive at thrust.
Thrust is a force. Thrust divided by the mass (weight) of the car determines the potential acceleration (a = f/M or f=M*a). If the rear tires are not slipping then the car can acclerate as described.
So by using numerically higher gear-ratio or differential ratios, you achieve more thrust at the rear wheels. Thrust causes acceleration, more thrust causes more acceleration.
Maybe I've grown too used to 400 rwhp but it seems like the car should be faster, so i'm wanting to learn more about gearing.
Ding, Ding, Ding, Ding!!!! We have a winner!!! Additionally, the higher numerically your gears are (within the same differential case), the weaker they'll be. This is because the ring gear stays the same size, but you add more teeth, hence the teeth are thinner.
Now, the MN12 gearbox could help you out, because it has gears that are not only a bit higher numerically, but also closer together. That way you could keep the revs closer to your peak.
An engine produces TQ, TQ gets multiplied by the transmission, and then gets multiplied (again) by the differential. The rear axel TQ is then divided by the rolling radius of the rear tire to arrive at thrust.
Thrust is a force. Thrust divided by the mass (weight) of the car determines the potential acceleration (a = f/M or f=M*a). If the rear tires are not slipping then the car can acclerate as described.
So by using numerically higher gear-ratio or differential ratios, you achieve more thrust at the rear wheels. Thrust causes acceleration, more thrust causes more acceleration.
Huh? :confused: What did he just say :crazy: :jester
There should be an RPO code list somewhere (mine is on the glovebox door) that lists all the RPO codes. see my 1st post for the RPO codes for the different gear ratios (except the "performance" gears).
The gear is not it. 3:42's are the most effecient for what the C5 was designed for in the first place, that's why it is standard in a stickshift. 2:73's and 3:15's would be wrong because you are looking for more bottom end and they are designed just for top end. 3:73's will kill your topend, but give you great bottom end. You only have St I heads and cam, and that's a small cam. You know you want to bump it up, why fight it? It's only money? haha Good luck
In your car, 3:73 will get you very similar Z06 gearing, w/o having the streach to 4th gear like the Z. Anything more than 3:73's would be drag only IMHO. But I think 3:73's could really benifit you on the road course. Also, as far as killing top end :rolleyes: How's 165mph and still pulling sound :D
Just another note for the ratio. 3:42 rearend gear means the axle gear is making almost 3 1/2 turns (3.42) for each rotation of the drive shaft. 3:73 means the axle gear is making 3 and 3/4 turns for each rotation of the drive shaft. So you can see how as you reach top end the larger gear (numercally, because the gear is actually smaller with less teeth), will start costing you. Just the opposite with a 2:73 or 3:15, which runs like a snail off the line, but has a higher top end due to the smaller gear (numerically-but it is actually larger, with alot more teeth), capable of much higher speeds, Like the biggest sprocket on a 10 speed. Which is why the 3:42 is the best for circle track. I hope I didn't get to elementary, I'm tired and need to get some sleep! haha
Just another note for the ratio. 3:42 rearend gear means the axle gear is making almost 3 1/2 turns (3.42) for each rotation of the drive shaft. 3:73 means the axle gear is making 3 and 3/4 turns for each rotation of the drive shaft. So you can see how as you reach top end the larger gear (numercally, because the gear is actually smaller with less teeth), will start costing you. Just the opposite with a 2:73 or 3:15, which runs like a snail off the line, but has a higher top end due to the smaller gear (numerically-but it is actually larger, with alot more teeth), capable of much higher speeds, Like the biggest sprocket on a 10 speed. Which is why the 3:42 is the best for circle track. I hope I didn't get to elementary, I'm tired and need to get some sleep! haha
Actually, the above is backwards. For a 3.42 the driveshaft is turning about three and a half times per axle rotation, not the other way around. Conversely, The 2.73 gear turns the axles more times per driveshaft revolution than a 3.73 does. Think about it: at 4000 RPM in top gear with a 2.73 I will go faster than I will with a 3.73--therefore the axles must be turning faster.
Thanks for correcting me, I did say I was tired and needed some sleep! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: It's a trade off, bottom end or top end, or somewhere in the middle for circle track.
Thanks for correcting me, I did say I was tired and needed some sleep! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: It's a trade off, bottom end or top end, or somewhere in the middle for circle track.
Ok, we forgive ya...tomorrow's another day! :D But it is good someone caught it before a gear purchase was made with the wrong info! Ha! :eek:
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.