Why are C5's designed to run so hot???
I guess I'm missing something. 192 degree tstat, coolant running through the throttle body heating the intake air, std fan on/off settings in the 220 degree range... why did GM design the C5 to run so hot?
GM produces cars for the general public and although most of us on the Forum are performance minded - there are some who buy vettes just as "transportation" to look :cool:
So, I'm guessing the General put the 192 stat in for 'quick' easy starts so you won't hafta wait ~ even in cold winter temp. ......Plus they are based in Detroit ! :lol:
Anyways..... for us Southern boys & gals.... a 160-stat makes better sense. :yesnod:
GM produces cars for the general public and although most of us on the Forum are performance minded - there are some who buy vettes just as "transportation" to look :cool:
So, I'm guessing the General put the 192 stat in for 'quick' easy starts so you won't hafta wait ~ even in cold winter temp. ......Plus they are based in Detroit ! :lol:
Anyways..... for us Southern boys & gals.... a 160-stat makes better sense. :yesnod:
Lastly, I have experimented with various coolant temps at the drag strip: on the same day with all else being relatively equal, 195-200F coolant temps produce the most power (trap speeds).
Robert
[Modified by rwj383, 2:29 PM 7/21/2003]
So, the whole engine runs hot to consume less gas than a cooler engine does--milage.
Sounds like all those ads for lower temp tstats claiming "more HP" aren't telling the whole story.
I think the message here is the cooler t'stat is fine as the engine will run warmer than that just due to fan turn on and outside operating conditions.
Jer
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
GM used to put lower t-stats in their engines (180 deg, if I remember correctly), and went to the 190 deg stats to achieve lower emissions, in the 1980's I believe.
I'm certain I read about this in one of GM's early tech papers.
I have the stock thermostat, and my coolant always reads from 192-194 while moving (highway/most city traffic) even in past two weeks of 98-100 degree weather in Dallas. Even sitting still in the heat, 205 is the hottest I've seen my coolant.
Engine oil temp under the weather same hot weather conditions is between 190-207 under highway or stop and go. If I'm really revving and running hard, it has gone up to 216-225 at the most.
My simple understanding has always been that it is good for the engine to heat beyond 212 so that condensation and other things in the oil can burn off. Is that incorrect? If so, does that have anything to do with engine oil being above 212?
What exactly does a 180 or lower thermostat do for a motor--both positive and negative. I'm curious as I don't understand how it helps, or is it hype?
Thanks,
Karl :confused:
Does anyone know the engine coolant temperature (ECT) specified in the PCM for the transition between "Open Loop" and "Closed Loop" fuel delivery?
Fuel is being provided in "Open Loop" when when the HO2S are not hot enough, or the ECT is below a specified (194F?) temperature, or a specified amount of time from startup has not passed.
Seems like running too cool a thermostat will delay/prevent the car from beginning "Closed Loop" operation. This would decrease fuel mileage and reduce performance, (Cause carbon build up?)
Are folks reprogramming the PCM when they change thermostats?
Reference: Page 6-1023 in the 2003 service manual.
[Modified by mapman, 12:58 AM 7/22/2003]
The oil system is a closed and PRESSURIZED system. If I remember right, my oil pressure is usually about 42#. According to my trusty steam tables here, at 40 PSIA water doesn't boil until 267.25*F. That means that your oil temp would have to get to about 275* or so for the watter to boil off in a 42 PSIG system. I don't even want to think about the 'physical property' changes due to the water being mixed with the oil, but lets assume that they are negligible as far as the point that I'm trying to make is concerned.
If your oil did get hot enough to 'boil off' the water into steam, where would it go? As the term 'closed system' implies, it isn't vented to the atmosphere. If you did manage to separate all of the steam from the oil inside your engine, it would probably just collect in 'pockets' that are in low flow areas and rob moving parts of proper lubrication. That would be a bad thing. :cry
While my above reasoning might be flawed, I don't think anyone can argue against the fact that oil floats on water, or that oil and water don't mix. That being said, if you NEVER drove your car, all of the water would eventually separate out of the oil and be sitting at the bottom of your oil pan. The next time you changed your oil all of the water would come out first (isn't gravity wonderful) and you could then refill your enging with 7 quarts of your favorite 'water free' oil. Unfortunately C5's are usually driven in a way that tends to 'mix things up' in the car. I can't imagine what a trip to the Piggly Wiggly would be like if I didn't have that cargo net in the back.
Anyway, I just don't buy it when people tell me that my car isn't running "hot enough" because of the 160* stat.
:cheers:
My simple understanding has always been that it is good for the engine to heat beyond 212 so that condensation and other things in the oil can burn off. Is that incorrect?
I have heard this many times before, and this isn't meant to be a flame, I just don't think it actually happens. While I agree that it would be beneficial to the engine if this were true, there are a couple of things to prevent it.
The oil system is a closed and PRESSURIZED system. If I remember right, my oil pressure is usually about 42#. According to my trusty steam tables here, at 40 PSIA water doesn't boil until 267.25*F. That means that your oil temp would have to get to about 275* or so for the watter to boil off in a 42 PSIG system. I don't even want to think about the 'physical property' changes due to the water being mixed with the oil, but lets assume that they are negligible as far as the point that I'm trying to make is concerned.
If your oil did get hot enough to 'boil off' the water into steam, where would it go? As the term 'closed system' implies, it isn't vented to the atmosphere. If you did manage to separate all of the steam from the oil inside your engine, it would probably just collect in 'pockets' that are in low flow areas and rob moving parts of proper lubrication. That would be a bad thing. :cry
While my above reasoning might be flawed, I don't think anyone can argue against the fact that oil floats on water, or that oil and water don't mix. That being said, if you NEVER drove your car, all of the water would eventually separate out of the oil and be sitting at the bottom of your oil pan. The next time you changed your oil all of the water would come out first (isn't gravity wonderful) and you could then refill your enging with 7 quarts of your favorite 'water free' oil. Unfortunately C5's are usually driven in a way that tends to 'mix things up' in the car. I can't imagine what a trip to the Piggly Wiggly would be like if I didn't have that cargo net in the back.
Anyway, I just don't buy it when people tell me that my car isn't running "hot enough" because of the 160* stat.
:cheers:
My understanding is a bit different than this. As far as I know the oil is not at high pressure in the oil pan and is only under pressure out of the pump and down the lines. (Think of a man made waterfall with a pump in the bottom of the pond) Also vapor is not stuck there as the crankcase is not a truly closed system as all vapor is vented to the combustion chamber by the PCV (positive crankcase ventilation system) In theory water will leave oil at any temperature as water will always evaporate, even at room temperature. What I, believe, makes this more difficult is the oil is always churning in a running car and tends to keep the water in suspension. Higher temperatures help seperate the water from the oil and once it becomes vapor it heads for the combustion chamber courtesy of the PCV system. That's my understanding, maybe somebody else can chime in.
I didn't want to start an
or anything, and I really don't know of any factual information either pro or con concerning a lower temp thermostat. I just wanted to throw in my
concerning the 'boil off the water' reasoning. Like it's been stated before, the 192* stat (IMHO) is PROBABLY one of the ways GM got a 5.7L engine with 350+ HP to pass California emissions.



















