C5 Tech Corvette Tech/Performance: LS1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Cam Only vs. Heads & Cam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 14, 2003 | 12:50 PM
  #1  
tr18's Avatar
tr18
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 0
From: Rockville Centre NY
Default Cam Only vs. Heads & Cam

What are the pros and cons of these two options. I assume less hp (but about how much difference?) with a cam only, but also less money spent ( also about how much difference). What are the other tradeoffs?

Thanks


[Modified by tr18, 1:34 PM 11/14/2003]
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2003 | 01:09 PM
  #2  
QwikSilvr's Avatar
QwikSilvr
Pro
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 512
Likes: 19
From: Greensboro NC
Default Re: Cam Only vs. Heads & Cam (tr18)

Not only will you get less peak HP, but you'll get a lot less area under the power curve. I see guys put in just cams and make great peak power, but I'd like to see a cam only car's dyno and see just how much power is under the curve.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2003 | 04:46 PM
  #3  
LittleBoyBlu99's Avatar
LittleBoyBlu99
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,298
Likes: 0
From: Tyler TX
Default Re: Cam Only vs. Heads & Cam (QwikSilvr)

Not only will you get less peak HP, but you'll get a lot less area under the power curve. I see guys put in just cams and make great peak power, but I'd like to see a cam only car's dyno and see just how much power is under the curve.
:cool: :cool: :cheers:
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2003 | 06:27 PM
  #4  
robz's Avatar
robz
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 8,308
Likes: 157
From: NJ
Default Re: Cam Only vs. Heads & Cam (QwikSilvr)

I would do a cam first and see how the new afr heads turn out.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2003 | 07:22 PM
  #5  
Bat Boy99's Avatar
Bat Boy99
Instructor
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Houston FL
Default Re: Cam Only vs. Heads & Cam (robz)

:iagree:

But think long term when looking at cams...(ie. AFR+CAM= Big #s)
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2003 | 08:26 PM
  #6  
2001 Red Coupe Bandit's Avatar
2001 Red Coupe Bandit
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,909
Likes: 1
From: Highland Village TX
Default Re: Cam Only vs. Heads & Cam (Bat Boy99)

Cams only make great power, I ran an 11.82 at 115 and there are many faster than me, but come on now,,,,,,,,,Heads and Cam will Definately Be Better :D
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2003 | 09:56 PM
  #7  
C7GrandSport's Avatar
C7GrandSport
Safety Car
15 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,469
Likes: 20
From: Rockville Centre NY
Default Re: Cam Only vs. Heads & Cam (2001 Red Coupe Bandit)

As happy as I am cam only, I'll be having the new AFR heads put on when they're available. Would've been a lot cheaper labor wise to do them at the same time. But of course, I just couldn't wait to get a cam in. It did make a big difference in my car, so I probably should quit while I'm ahead but once you start the mods it's hard to stop!


[Modified by c5grandsport, 9:58 PM 11/14/2003]
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2003 | 10:29 PM
  #8  
Mopar Jimmy's Avatar
Mopar Jimmy
Team Owner
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 26,794
Likes: 614
From: Elmhurst, IL (West Suburb of Chicago) & Home of MEGA Horsepower
St. Jude Donor '06
Default Re: Cam Only vs. Heads & Cam (c5grandsport)

"...... so I probably should quit while I'm ahead but once you start the mods it's hard to stop"!


YEAH, I'll say, look what happened to me! :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:

All kidding aside (but not really, this mod game is addicting as sh it) i say do cam only as the stock heads flow great and the cam and bolt ons are good for high 11s and you don't need to go heads to achieve high 11s. If you then have the extra cash to burn wait for the new AFR heads and see the results they yield and then throw them on if you can reason that they are a good bang for your buck!!!! :smash: If you must do heads now look into the new patriots which are only 1600.00 without a core charge and look like a nice piece and performer. Honestly though, i feel the heads will only give you an extra tenth or two in the 1/4 mile and you really don't need them!


[Modified by MTI 427 Roadster, 8:00 AM 11/15/2003]
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2003 | 11:30 PM
  #9  
REDGAR's Avatar
REDGAR
Team Owner
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 32,545
Likes: 2
From: Lithia FL
Cruise-In II & IV Veteran
CI VI Drag Champ!
Default Re: Cam Only vs. Heads & Cam (tr18)

My current observations is that heads seam to be worth about .5 in the 1/4 which could be roughly 50 hp. Depending on what you get, you could be looking at an increase of $2,500 to your installed price.

It is a matter of where you want to end up.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2003 | 08:38 AM
  #10  
V8_Club's Avatar
V8_Club
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
From: Dubai
Default Re: Cam Only vs. Heads & Cam (REDGAR)

I am doing cam first. I suggest you do the same also . The extra expense initially is too high. Like our friends here said mod fever is :crazy: . Enjoy your current mods then when you find a great deal a little further down the line go for it.

P.S. Make sure your choice is in line with your target , I plan to go with forced induction hence the LQ4 Head ( 6.0 L truck ) is a good choice since it lowers compression ratio to about 9:1. If NA is your way there is nothng like the Awesome LS6 . Compression goes up to about 10.5:1 ( without milling ) .

:steering:
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2003 | 04:40 PM
  #11  
robsvette's Avatar
robsvette
Safety Car
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 3,950
Likes: 32
From: belleville n.j.
Default Re: Cam Only vs. Heads & Cam (V8_Club)

if u can run as good as rwhite with his cam only c5 than heads are garbage!!!

i dont know about reliablilty issues but his times are dam well impressive
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2003 | 05:59 PM
  #12  
RWhite's Avatar
RWhite
Melting Slicks
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 0
From: Collin County Texas
Default Re: Cam Only vs. Heads & Cam (robsvette)

If I could pickup .5 from ported heads :eek: ,

11.15-.5+ better air = :p:
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2003 | 10:03 PM
  #13  
MagRed01Atty's Avatar
MagRed01Atty
Instructor
20 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: Irvine CA
Default Re: Cam Only vs. Heads & Cam (RWhite)

But doesn't the cam choice depend on whether or not you have installed heads? I thought your cam had to match your heads? I wouldn't want to change cams when I install the heads later? :confused:
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2003 | 07:26 AM
  #14  
Mopar Jimmy's Avatar
Mopar Jimmy
Team Owner
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 26,794
Likes: 614
From: Elmhurst, IL (West Suburb of Chicago) & Home of MEGA Horsepower
St. Jude Donor '06
Default Re: Cam Only vs. Heads & Cam (RWhite)

RWHITE,

What are the specs again on that bad boy cam as i starting to think a cam would be just what i need to squeeze the extra 5oHP i'm looking to get out of my new 03 Z06 and what dyno numbers did you pull? I seem to recall you made around 390rwhp or so. How close am i and what torque do you make at the wheels.


Reply
Old Nov 20, 2003 | 02:02 PM
  #15  
andreas g.'s Avatar
andreas g.
Drifting
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 125
From: laguna niguel ca
Default Re: Cam Only vs. Heads & Cam (MTI 427 Roadster)

I have a 2002 6sp. with bolt ons I made 331RWHP and 338RWTQ. With an under drive pully and TR 220.553/114, my power went to 379RWHP, and 363
RWTQ. not bad for stock heads and a mild cam. Since then I' ve had my heads done by one of the best. Joe Jill at Superior Auto in anaheim Cal. He also had my cam ground special to the flow numbers of the heads. results:
405RWHP 393RWTQ. If you can't afford the H/C do the cam first. The labor cost don't cross each other. Food for thought: cam, do the double roller timming chain and oil pump from SLP. heads. change your lifters OEM is just fine. Good insurance!!!

Reply
Old Nov 20, 2003 | 02:13 PM
  #16  
RWhite's Avatar
RWhite
Melting Slicks
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 0
From: Collin County Texas
Default Re: Cam Only vs. Heads & Cam (andreas g.)

Specs on the M2

228/234 .607/.598 110

Reply
Old Nov 20, 2003 | 02:50 PM
  #17  
Mopar Jimmy's Avatar
Mopar Jimmy
Team Owner
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 26,794
Likes: 614
From: Elmhurst, IL (West Suburb of Chicago) & Home of MEGA Horsepower
St. Jude Donor '06
Default Re: Cam Only vs. Heads & Cam (RWhite)

:cheers: :cheers: Gotta love those bad boy specs. :cheers: :cool:
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2003 | 03:17 PM
  #18  
SFVetteman's Avatar
SFVetteman
Drifting
10 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,607
Likes: 1
From: San Francisco CA
Default Re: Cam Only vs. Heads & Cam (andreas g.)

Food for thought: cam, do the double roller timming chain and oil pump from SLP. heads. change your lifters OEM is just fine. Good insurance!!!
:iagree: but get the same double roller timing set from Scoggin-Dickey and save a 100 bucks or get the same double roller timing set upgraded with a torrington bearing for the cam gear and still save 80 bucks. Scoggin-Dickey also offers a blueprinted and ported oil pump for 30 bucks less than SLP.

Somehow I spaced out and did not replace the oil pump and lifters when I had the chance. My oil pump is still ok but I have a lifter that sometimes takes as long as 5 minutes to pump up when the car is started :conehead
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Cam Only vs. Heads & Cam





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:07 PM.