What's the difference between 13/4" and 17/8" headers?

Besides the 1/8", what's the difference performance wise?

The Area of a 1.75 in. tube is 2.40 in. That is enough for a 346 or even a 383 but would restrict the airflow put out by bigger motors such as 402, 408, 418, 422, 427, 436, and 441...
The Area of a 1.875 in. tube is 2.88 in. that is over 4/10s of an inch! That would be too much for a 346 or 383 but would satisfy the needs of the bigger engines like the ones I listed above...
That 4/10 of an in. can result in up to 30 - 40 CFM differences... That could make a world of difference...
Depends on the engine's mods... and the intended useage.
general rule-of-thumb is... where (what RPM range) you want the benefit to occur. If you want it at lower RPM's ... then the smaller diameter is better for that.
If you want the power increase to happen at a higher RPM (1/4 mile drag enthusiasts), then the larger diameter is best suited.
Despite all the mathematics, this is how it pans-out on the street/strip.
.
[Modified by Mike Mercury, 10:44 AM 7/3/2004]




maybe not...
Depends on the engine's mods... and the intended useage.
general rule-of-thumb is... where (what RPM range) you want the benefit to occur. If you want it at lower RPM's ... then the smaller diameter is better for that.
If you want the power increase to happen at a higher RPM (1/4 mile drag enthusiasts), then the larger diameter is best suited.
Despite all the mathematics, this is how it pans-out on the street/strip.
I think that is the right way to look at this...it is not just geometry.

maybe not...
Depends on the engine's mods... and the intended useage.
general rule-of-thumb is... where (what RPM range) you want the benefit to occur. If you want it at lower RPM's ... then the smaller diameter is better for that.
If you want the power increase to happen at a higher RPM (1/4 mile drag enthusiasts), then the larger diameter is best suited.
Despite all the mathematics, this is how it pans-out on the street/strip.
the effect you are talking about is a result of primary length... the longer the primary, the slightly higher the back pressure will be the more low end torque... Shorter primarys are less resrictive and offer a higher range torque curve... I am not exactly a header specialist but im sure you can ask lou at LG or nick at kooks and they could give you a more professional explanation... But I am pretty sure i am on the right track
If you have a modified heads/cam car with a much higher redline, or a bored/stroked motor, or blower/turbo, you'll need the larger diameter tube to keep from limiting the top end horsepower. The LS6 isn't anything magical -- racers having been doing this for a long time, and unless you have a high horsepower smallblock, a 1-3/4" header is what you need.
The best bet is to simply call LG or Kooks or Stainless Works or Dynotech and tell them what your horsepower goals are and let them suggest tubing diameter.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
it's best for people to put their calculator down and visit the track. That's where the real world opens ones eyes.
1) John Lingenfelter on Modifying Small-Block Chevy Engines - High Performance Engine Building and Tuning for Street and Racing
2) Chevrolet Power - How to Prepare Chevrolet Engines for Maximum Performance
To paraphrase John Lingenfelter, too large diameter primaries will not allow exhaust gases to pick up enough speed to exit the cylinder, thus causing some of the spent gases to recirculate back into the next cycle, and produce less power, especially at low rpms.
The second book was much more about swapping factory parts versus aftermarket parts, and has a pretty weak section on exhaust design.
John Lingenfelter did a lot for us during his lifetime, I just wish things could've worked out so could've done an updated version of his book too...instead we got a LS1 Performance book and a Corvette Fuel Injection Systems book both from other people, and full of fiction, opinion, and errors.
[Modified by leaftye, 2:14 AM 7/4/2004]









