Notices
C5 General General C5 Corvette and C5 Z06 Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

[Z06] Highest hp stock cam LS6....who has pushed the limits?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-24-2011, 11:32 AM
  #41  
ctusser
Melting Slicks
 
ctusser's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: Woodinville WA
Posts: 2,186
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

[QUOTE=machz800ps;1576882711]
Originally Posted by KLR Z
My C5Z put down 462/400 with just cam only stock Intake manifold and stock 243 heads (untouched). The printer at Quality Motorsports had a mind of its own that day and on the highest run it did not print the TQ just the HP. But out of 5 pulls the car was a solid 453-462hp and 395-400tq.

I think the dyno had a mind of its own!!!!!!!
Time for it to be recalibrated

Steve
I know. It seemed like a couple years ago the highest cam only numbers were around the 430whp range. Lately there have been a few at 450whp posted and now 460+. Wait a couple more years and everyone will expect 500whp with a cam swap.
Old 02-24-2011, 11:43 AM
  #42  
thechosenone
Melting Slicks
 
thechosenone's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=ctusser;1576882786]
Originally Posted by machz800ps

I know. It seemed like a couple years ago the highest cam only numbers were around the 430whp range. Lately there have been a few at 450whp posted and now 460+. Wait a couple more years and everyone will expect 500whp with a cam swap.
I have the Trex cam by Thunder racing. I am going to be having it dynoed again so I will have a update with the new numbers and this will be a on a totally different dyno.
Old 02-24-2011, 11:55 AM
  #43  
machz800ps
Burning Brakes
 
machz800ps's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2009
Location: New Baltimore Michigan
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

[QUOTE=ctusser;1576882786]
Originally Posted by machz800ps

I know. It seemed like a couple years ago the highest cam only numbers were around the 430whp range. Lately there have been a few at 450whp posted and now 460+. Wait a couple more years and everyone will expect 500whp with a cam swap.
I have been seeing 418-425 rwhp roughly on the forum here with lt headers, cai, cam, and tune. klr z you are saying you have a cam only correct and i assume a tune, stock manifolds got to kill a cam it needs to breath, i would think 405-410rwhp tops without. JMO
What cam you running

Steve
Old 02-25-2011, 01:50 PM
  #44  
AU N EGL
Team Owner
 
AU N EGL's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: Raleigh / Rolesville NC
Posts: 43,084
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 63Corvette
OK, here's a start: (note, you didn't ask for limitations)
1) up compression (say 15:1) and run race gas.
2) use max vacuum on the crankcase to remove oil spray losses from the crank, and use dry sump.
3) from there you're on your own..........but it's a start
4) install Skatter shields, and pray

Old 02-25-2011, 02:02 PM
  #45  
zeevette
Race Director
 
zeevette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Pasco WA
Posts: 10,807
Received 288 Likes on 235 Posts

Default

Seems like we veered a long way from the OP's assertation that you could best C6Z performance with a C5Z with stock heads/cam/block.
Old 02-25-2011, 02:02 PM
  #46  
bullitt4110
Le Mans Master
 
bullitt4110's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Mt Pleasant, TN
Posts: 6,674
Received 56 Likes on 49 Posts

Default

I worked a corvette (C5/C6) specific performance shop for a few years and in that time I can only remember one person getting heads and headers done without a cam in a C5Z, I dont remember the exact results but if it was something even somewhat impressive I would have. I could see maybe 410-415. Better flowing heads, intake etc is only going to do so much when the cam doesnt need that much air. I like the out of the box thinking and hope it works for you. There was one 03 C5Z that with just a CAI (I think Vararam) and a catback (maybe bullets?) and a tune put down 382rwhp, I thought that was pretty impressive.

Last edited by bullitt4110; 02-25-2011 at 02:04 PM.
Old 02-25-2011, 02:05 PM
  #47  
zeevette
Race Director
 
zeevette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Pasco WA
Posts: 10,807
Received 288 Likes on 235 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by arctic 92
As a long time engine builder, fabricator, etc. I've built many platforms over the years. As I move and learn more about these LSx engines, I have tried to establish what's been done and what's yet to be done.

Like many other genres I have experience with, the Corvette crowd has a pretty typical upgrade path that 95% follow to get to "x" hp and what not. What I haven't seen much of are those who try to break the path.

One would be, who's explored the limits of the car while maintaining stock heads/cam. Combinations with headwork, intake mani work, etc. C6Z whp with a C5Z combination that is mildly mannered is the ticket IMO. Has anyone pumped up the c/r a tad, worked the heads/intake and kept the stock cam to see how much power can be made while being able to lug 6th gear at 40mph like a stock cam car will?

This feels to me to be the path I'd like to go with this car. I'm just wondering if there are any others out there. Any aftermarket companies on here ever really explore what you can do on a stock grind?

Post it up...
I stand corrected. Here is the original post. There's a contradiction regarding the heads. In one sentence he states stock heads, and in the next, he mentions "headwork". So I guess I'm not sure what's to remain stock in this scenario, and what gets modified?
Old 02-25-2011, 06:08 PM
  #48  
Z06X
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Z06X's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2010
Location: Pittsburgh Pa
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ctusser
I'm really surprised at the amount of flak the OP is getting on this thread.
Which is why I haven't returned. There are some valid opinions and some statements made I've read and I've taken them for what their worth. I appreciate valid input.

Calling me a "douche", yet not even spelling it right is laughable. Saying "hey look at me, I build race engines"....well, I mean, I do run a company that builds racecars, forced induction components, GTM's, SLC's and tunes EMS's...I must know something to be here. I've built more engines than I recall so...I have SOME experience I think. The guy who called me a douche....what do you do for a living? You've done a few bolt on mods and troll a forum puking up info you've read?

As with most things, I'll do it and share with those who value the information. On engine building forums, things like this spark discussion on how to make such a thing possible, on enthusiast forums it sparks trolls.

Cams dictate an engines ability to breath yes, but saying YOU CAN'T MAKE POWER without an upgraded cam is ridiculous. Has anyone ever taken note of the power cup cars make, or ALMS cars with ridiculously small inlet restrictors in place? It CAN be done, but is the effort worth it is the question. Is the investment worth it? Will I do it to see....mostlikely yes...

I have a full shop, countless LSx motors here, a dyno, three GTM chassis, two Corvettes and time. Doing something like this benefits the members and enthusiasts, as well as our business. If I thought so narrow minded about how engines make power, then I'd have never gotten into building cars. That's like saying 800hp isn't possible unless you have 8 cylinders. Words spoken by those who think they know way more than they do.

We all have a lot to learn...some continue to learn, some figure they got it all covered. Doing what I do got me where I am today so....troll all you want there Zeevette...maybe I'll see you at SEMA or PRI....ehhh...doubtful right....yeah I thought so.

Last edited by Z06X; 02-25-2011 at 06:11 PM.
The following users liked this post:
99 Black Bird TA (08-19-2022)
Old 02-25-2011, 06:20 PM
  #49  
81c3
Le Mans Master
 
81c3's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2005
Location: Where Woke Goes to Die
Posts: 8,194
Received 615 Likes on 431 Posts

Default

[QUOTE=machz800ps;1576882711]
Originally Posted by KLR Z
My C5Z put down 462/400 with just cam only stock Intake manifold and stock 243 heads (untouched). The printer at Quality Motorsports had a mind of its own that day and on the highest run it did not print the TQ just the HP. But out of 5 pulls the car was a solid 453-462hp and 395-400tq.

I think the dyno had a mind of its own!!!!!!!
Time for it to be recalibrated

Steve
Theres no way thats accurate with just those mods.
Old 02-25-2011, 07:37 PM
  #50  
ctusser
Melting Slicks
 
ctusser's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: Woodinville WA
Posts: 2,186
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by zeevette
I stand corrected. Here is the original post. There's a contradiction regarding the heads. In one sentence he states stock heads, and in the next, he mentions "headwork". So I guess I'm not sure what's to remain stock in this scenario, and what gets modified?
I'm guessing he means retaining the stock heads but improving them
(shaving and porting,) not going to an aftermarket brand.
Old 02-25-2011, 08:00 PM
  #51  
zeevette
Race Director
 
zeevette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Pasco WA
Posts: 10,807
Received 288 Likes on 235 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by arctic 92
We all have a lot to learn...some continue to learn, some figure they got it all covered. Doing what I do got me where I am today so....troll all you want there Zeevette...maybe I'll see you at SEMA or PRI....ehhh...doubtful right....yeah I thought so.

I really would like to meet you at SEMA. I think it could be very educational. You can explain your magic ability to extract unrealistic amounts of HP (what about TQ?) with rather severe restrictions, and I can respond to your name calling. I have gone, but it's more for entertainment, and seeing what's new, than making business contacts. Cars are a hobby for me, not a means of making a living. Be that as it may, I stand by my opinion, of it being impractical, improbable, and certainly not cost effective to do as you claim. I believe you are wrong, and I can spell douche.
Old 02-25-2011, 08:01 PM
  #52  
ctusser
Melting Slicks
 
ctusser's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: Woodinville WA
Posts: 2,186
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 63Corvette
OK, here's a start: (note, you didn't ask for limitations)
1) up compression (say 15:1) and run race gas.
2) use max vacuum on the crankcase to remove oil spray losses from the crank, and use dry sump.
3) from there you're on your own..........but it's a start
You could conceivably hit 450whp on a Dynojet with 13.5:1 compression with stock cam, full bolt ons, some head & Intake mani porting, EWP, UD pulley, Lightweight flywheel if you do run race gas. But to get it might require dome pistons which would eliminate the stock bottom end premise.

Last edited by ctusser; 02-25-2011 at 08:04 PM.
Old 02-25-2011, 09:55 PM
  #53  
GeorgeZNJ
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
GeorgeZNJ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Winston-Salem North Carolina
Posts: 14,639
Received 38 Likes on 32 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08-'09

Default

[QUOTE=ctusser;1576882786]
Originally Posted by machz800ps

I know. It seemed like a couple years ago the highest cam only numbers were around the 430whp range. Lately there have been a few at 450whp posted and now 460+. Wait a couple more years and everyone will expect 500whp with a cam swap.
When I had my ls6 cam only (with supporting bolt-ons) I was at 430/383. But this was appeox 4 yrs ago. Those numbers are passed daily with the newer cams.

Last edited by GeorgeZNJ; 02-25-2011 at 10:01 PM.
Old 02-25-2011, 10:36 PM
  #54  
jake07Z06
Instructor
 
jake07Z06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2009
Posts: 237
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by arctic 92
Saying that the cam is the easiest and cheapest means to achieve that power is false.
Ok, name a more cost efficient way of adding power than a cam...
Old 02-25-2011, 10:43 PM
  #55  
thechosenone
Melting Slicks
 
thechosenone's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jake07Z06
Ok, name a more cost efficient way of adding power than a cam...
Nitrous!
Old 02-26-2011, 12:01 AM
  #56  
winters97gt
Le Mans Master
 
winters97gt's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: Somewhere in the Mid 9's TX
Posts: 8,291
Received 77 Likes on 65 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jake07Z06
Ok, name a more cost efficient way of adding power than a cam...
meth.
Old 02-26-2011, 01:36 AM
  #57  
Z06X
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Z06X's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2010
Location: Pittsburgh Pa
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zeevette
I really would like to meet you at SEMA. I think it could be very educational. You can explain your magic ability to extract unrealistic amounts of HP (what about TQ?) with rather severe restrictions, and I can respond to your name calling. I have gone, but it's more for entertainment, and seeing what's new, than making business contacts. Cars are a hobby for me, not a means of making a living. Be that as it may, I stand by my opinion, of it being impractical, improbable, and certainly not cost effective to do as you claim. I believe you are wrong, and I can spell douche.
I never once said cost effective. What's impractical? Your comprehension is poor pal. Move on and keep spectating....

I got your opinion, shut up already.

Get notified of new replies

To Highest hp stock cam LS6....who has pushed the limits?

Old 02-26-2011, 01:41 AM
  #58  
Z06X
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Z06X's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2010
Location: Pittsburgh Pa
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KLR Z
Nitrous!
That was easy....
Old 02-26-2011, 03:48 AM
  #59  
zeevette
Race Director
 
zeevette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Pasco WA
Posts: 10,807
Received 288 Likes on 235 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by arctic 92
I never once said cost effective. What's impractical? Your comprehension is poor pal. Move on and keep spectating....

I got your opinion, shut up already.


You can't answer a straight question, because you have no answers. For such a smug, self-satisfied know-it-all, you contribute nothing. What's impractical? Your stupid idea of bettering a LS7 without changing stock heads and cam.
Old 02-26-2011, 04:00 AM
  #60  
winters97gt
Le Mans Master
 
winters97gt's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: Somewhere in the Mid 9's TX
Posts: 8,291
Received 77 Likes on 65 Posts

Default

Artic, let's get this thread moving. Are you starting work this week? I'm interested to see how practical the build is.


Quick Reply: [Z06] Highest hp stock cam LS6....who has pushed the limits?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:41 PM.