When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Has anyone use this G-timer unit from Escort? It measures your 0-60 time, 1/4 mile time and horsepower. All you have to do is plug it into the cigarette lighter. It cost $100 and $180 for the newer model. I just got my Escort 8500 radar detector in the mail and there was a flyer in the box that shows this G-Timer unit.
Has anyone use this G-timer unit from Escort? It measures your 0-60 time, 1/4 mile time and horsepower. All you have to do is plug it into the cigarette lighter. It cost $100 and $180 for the newer model. I just got my Escort 8500 radar detector in the mail and there was a flyer in the box that shows this G-Timer unit.
From the input I read the last time this subject was posted I would have to agree with the general consensus from that post and say that the Timer would not be worth the money. I thought about getting it too, but I honestly can not believe that I would get my money out of it and would get bored of it very quickly.
You can get a dyno run and a drag strip lap for cheaper than this unit and I would imagine it would be much more accurate. If you are a tuner and planning on a lot of mods one at a time and want to check your results many times then it might not be a bad idea.
Has anyone use this G-timer unit from Escort? It measures your 0-60 time, 1/4 mile time and horsepower. All you have to do is plug it into the cigarette lighter. It cost $100 and $180 for the newer model. I just got my Escort 8500 radar detector in the mail and there was a flyer in the box that shows this G-Timer unit.
I have one. It works pretty well. The numbers it produces are close to what I see on the drag strip, and the hp figures are reasonably close to what I see on the dyno. But you have to have a place where you can safely (never mind legally) make a maximum effort 1/4 mile run from a standing start. Not many places around here fit that criteria except the drag strip. So I don't use it often.
I did use it more in my 350Z because it can be configured to continuously report lateral Gs. But since my Corvette has that built into the HUD, I don't need to use the G-Timer for that anymore. (I don't use the one in the HUD much for that matter.) It is fun to see what sort of G you can pull around a corner, and even instructive if you're trying out new tires, but it isn't something you'd do every day.
It is a fun toy, the first few times you play with it, but I haven't found much continuing practical use for it. It can play back a run, so you can analyze what happened. That could be instructive for perfecting your driving technique. But there are much more comprehensive data loggers out there that would be infinitely more useful to the serious competitor or tuner.
I use the original G-tech and find it useful for evaluating the effectiveness of modifications and to compare claimed HP to repeatable actual HP. I had an engine dynoed and found that since people like big numbers, the calibrations had been set up to inflate the power curve.
I have tested 19 different vehicles at least one time each. The one thing I've found most consistant is that GM overates their engines relative to BMW, Yamaha, Kawaski, Dodge, and classic (pre 1972) GM.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.